I prefer to define it as “The Digitalization of Reality,” wherein more and more human activities are being translated into bytes. Work, communication, media, entertainment, friends, dating, sexuality, culture, shopping, politics and causes are among the growing number of human needs that have gone digital.

While the Internet was something which earlier we mostly visited, now we are inhabiting the virtual worlds full-time and engineer them according to our mental projections. The Cartesian dream of a mind without a body has almost been fulfilled (even though in his old age Descartes, in Passions of the Soul, affirmed that “the soul is jointly united to all the parts of the body”).

This separation has a long history of Western thought starting from the Judeo-Christian separation between body and soul up to people like the transhumanist Hans Moravec, the artificial intelligence researcher Marvin Minsky, or the singularity guru Raymond Kurzweil who want to download the biological human mind to a safer mechanical medium in order to achieve nothing less than immortality.

Technology itself is less and less “embodied” and physical. Technology is going toward Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and various wireless ways of communicating and even wire-free charging for devices. We have made even hi-tech tools withdraw physically from each other.

Weizenbaum, more than 30 years ago in Computer Power and Human Reason, described a typical computer programmer thus:

Bright young men of disheveled appearance, often with sunken glowing eyes, can be seen sitting at computer consoles, their arms tensed and waiting to fire their fingers, already poised to strike, at the buttons and keys on which their attention seems to be as riveted as a gambler’s on the rolling dice…Their food…coffee, Cokes, sandwiches. If possible, they sleep on cots near the computer…Their rumpled clothes, their unwashed and unshaven faces, and their uncombed hair all testify that they are oblivious to their bodies and to the world in which they move.

Brenda Laurel, designer of human computer interaction, notices differences in gender:

We have a class of people we call nerds who are radically uncomfortable with their bodies and their sexuality…When men talk about virtual reality, they often use phrases like “out-of-body experience” and “leaving the body.” These guys are not talking about out-of-body experiences in the way that some Eastern mystic or Peruvian Indian would. They are talking about it in the sense that if you slap a screen over your eyes you won’t have to see air pollution…When women talk about VR they speak of taking the body with them into another world. The idea is to take these wonderful sense organs with us, not to leave our bodies humped over a keyboard while our brain zips off down some network (Susie Bright, Sexual Reality, San Francisco: Cleis Press, 1992).

What was an attitude confined to technicians and nerds became “mainstream,” where most people are in front of a computer, TV or mobile screen for most of their waking lives, distancing themselves from a felt connection with their bodies, living in a purely mental world. Alexander Lowen, in Joy, wrote that in the more than 50 years since he began studying the human condition, he has seen a general deterioration in the bodies of the people who come to him; the bodies are less energized, less integrated and less attractive than those of the patients he used to see earlier. He writes that the old-fashioned hysterical patient that Freud wrote about is almost never seen. While the hysterical person couldn’t handle his feelings, the schizoid individual nowadays – dissociated from his body and living predominantly in his mind – just hasn’t many.

If technology is conducive toward the disappearance of physical reality, there’s a second philosophy which seems allied to the same goal. Several mystical traditions and spiritual teachers of the past and present consider physical reality as a dream – maya – as something to overcome in order to expand our awareness and connect with our deeper soul and with the ultimate. Physical reality is then something to be abandoned while advancing on our path toward spiritual enlightenment.

Shri Ramakrishna, in L’Enseignement de Ramakrishna, said that when a man becomes crazy for God, he becomes unconscious even of his body. Taking Chaitanya Deva as an example, Ramakrishna said that he “many times fell on the ground. He didn’t have any more hunger, or thirst, or even become sleepy. He completely lost the consciousness of his body”.

In Ramakrishna’s description of God’s crazy state we can see some similarities with Weizenbaum’s programmers. Apparently. Mystics abandon the body/mind in order to reach what is beyond the mind, while our society has relegated the body to a marginal role in order to give the mind the superior and controlling role.

Technologically-oriented people and mystics have another common point in saying that the world is unreal, an illusionary state. The former involve neurophysiology and psychology, while mystics talk about their first-hand experience in having reached a state where a broader awareness comes to the forefront, not depending on our body/mind filters any more.

But while virtual reality disconnects us from our bodies to give priority to the mind (considered the ultimate attainment of human beings), the spiritual paths toward awareness need to know, feel and live in the body as a source and object of knowledge before going beyond mind and body. In the spiritual path the body is seen as a whole body/mind entity, observed by a broader awareness. In that journey, both body and mind might be lost for a while, to be retrieved later. David Cooper in The Grammar of Living wrote: “We have to lose our heads to enter our bodies. There is a time for minds, a time to leave our minds and a time to recover them.”

The body in the spiritual path is a fragile bridge toward the ultimate which has to be crossed with respect and care, sensing and feeling it without rushing to overcome it, otherwise we risk falling into the waters, losing our minds prematurely as well. Some religions discouraged or prohibited a close meeting with our bodies, particularly in the monotheistic traditions such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Being far from the sinful body was supposed to bring us closer to the divine incorporeal entity. But mystics – even the ones who came from those traditions – could not escape experiencing the body in its fullness.

The body can’t be ignored in our will to expand our awareness. Almaas (the pen name of Hameed Ali) expressed the connection with the body in the spiritual search for the truth in these terms:

As we get more present in our bodies, in our bellies, we can get closer to our essence which is truth, which is what makes us know what is true, what is false, not from logical deduction, or from the unconscious. You just know. You are close to that subtle sense which is truth. (A.H. Almaas. Elements of the Real in Man (Diamond Heart Book One). Diamond Books. Berkeley. 1987)

Eckhart Tolle expressed it in similar terms:

The most powerful anchor for staying present is to inhabit the body. That means to have some of your attention in the inner energy field of the body – to sense, to feel the animating presence that gives life to the body, which ultimately is consciousness itself. The physical body is a temporary expression of that consciousness, but the essence of it is the consciousness itself. So to connect with the physical body, and even as you perceive the world and interact with the world, to have some attention in the inner energy field and to feel the aliveness that is there in every cell and every organ as a single feeling. You are then rooted in your body, which becomes the anchor for staying present and for staying out of the mental noise (from Lynn Marie Lumiere and John Lumiere-Wins, The Awakening West, Oakland: Clear Visions Publications, 2000).

Feeling our presence and connection with our bodies works as well as the needed grounding for keeping our minds healthy in a technology-saturated disembodied schizoid condition. “The person who does not act in reality and only acts in fantasy becomes himself unreal,” wrote Ronald Laing in 1959, based on the observations of his patients, in The Divided Self (London: Tavistock Publications, 1959), while Marshall McLuhan wrote that, “By continuously embracing technologies, we relate ourselves to them as servomechanisms”. Through our technological race toward the digitalization of reality, we risk abandoning our bodies and split our minds as well, without finding anything superior for our soul to join, as is conversely contemplated in the Eastern spiritual paths.

There’s an echo of a deeper truth in the desire of replacing reality with a virtual one: the truth that the world as we see it is not the whole story. But through virtual worlds we might bend the distorting lenses of the mind even more, creating a further layer of illusionary maya. Instead of liberating ourselves from the deceptive mind, we liberate the mind from the “restrictions” of the body, coming closer to fulfilling the Cartesian dream. But the mind without a felt connection with the body doesn’t have support from our embodied intelligence and becomes compulsive in chasing every small bit of information which appears in our already-scattered attention, transforming our mind in servomechanisms of technology. Is it not a case that meditation techniques reinforce our concentration ability, usually giving attention to a part of our body or to our sensations.

However, even without any virtual technological life, the unreal can’t be avoided. Lila, the divine game played by the universal consciousness, has been playing the hide-and-seek game much before the human mind created a new hi-tech version of the game. Many spiritual teachers say that we live in a dream state, looking at reality filtered by the veil of maya which gives the mind many layers of conditionings. Perhaps lila is having fun in hiding even deeper, adding another layer by encouraging the collective mind in building its own virtual representations of reality. Ultimately, lila will become tired of playing and will reveal the true nature of reality, maybe through apparently hiding even more.

“To consider Maya, a deeper Maya is needed,” said Swami Nityananda, while Nisargadatta Maharaj said “Let the dream unroll itself to its very end. You cannot help it. But you can look at the dream as a dream, refuse it the stamp of reality,” suggesting that one be attentive and aware of recognizing the nature of the false. Since the real timeless soul (the atman) can’t be simulated or manufactured, Osho said that, “By going deeper and deeper into the artificial, science helps religion, extending the limits of what can be manufactured and thereby defining what the Atman is not”. What will be left from the limits of the artifice can be no more than the real.

In the Buddhist tradition there’s the metaphor of our illusionary ego as a thorn we have in our skin, where the Buddhist teachings represent a second thorn, useful in extracting the first one. Then we can discard both. Even an illusion can break into the ultimate reality as the Zen story, “No Water, No Moon,” where the nun attained enlightenment when the old pail broke and there was no more water in the pail, no more moon reflected in the water and, suddenly no more mind also distorting reality.

So the technological way of disconnecting from reality could be like the moon reflected in the pail which, once we become aware of the unreality of it (perhaps through the supposed big electromagnetic storm forecast in the next few years, which could block every electronic equipment), can break the mind free from any other obscuration?

I don’t know what the plans of lila are – and maybe there aren’t even any – as when kids are playing, but since the nun was carrying water, not Twittering, chatting, browsing websites, trading online or updating her Facebook page, she was present in feeling her body and her mind was probably empty for most of the time, in a state more receptive to be filled by Truth. In many spiritual paths the students are suggested to make repetitive actions, as cleaning the rice as a way to strengthen our presence and attention, taming the wandering mind. Those tasks would bore us to death, while we prefer instead, paraphrasing Neil Postman, to be amused to death.

Google recently discontinued Lively, the Second Life-like project. Even though that’s only one out of many of Google’s projects, it’s symbolic of a turning point from representation to reality.

In 1978, Jerry Mander in Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television (Quill, 1978) wrote:

In one generation, out of hundreds of thousands in human evolution, America had become the first culture to have substituted secondary, mediated versions of experience for direct experience of the world. Interpretation and representations of the world were being accepted as experience, and the difference between the two was obscure for most of us.

Thirty years later, it is not just about America and not just about TV. The detachment from direct experience grew layers. The attitude of substituting reality with mental representation was also one of the causes of the current financial problems, which constructed the illusionary “wealth,” considering information flowing through the cables as real goods.

Affirming that nothing is real is true both on the neurophysiological and spiritual levels. We have all heard that, especially in the Eastern traditions, the world is “maya,” an appearance, or illusion. Also, one of the mantras of people who populate the virtual worlds is to question reality saying that “there is nothing real in reality” since our experience is in any case mediated by our senses and by our nervous system which, starting from the mechanism of vision itself, only interprets reality. Following this line of thought we can say that there’s no objective reality and perhaps there’s no reality too, since every experience is mediated by our nervous system.

There’s an apparent concordance between neuroscientists, technical creators of virtual worlds and spiritual teachers. All of them, in different ways, say that the world in an illusion.

Since the times of Buddha and Plato, that the world is our representation has been a philosophical, metaphysical, psychological and spiritual assumption much before science and technology came into our lives. Philosophers and mystics expressed this in a much more sophisticated way than any software environment or technocrat.

[/en][it]

Recentemente, Google ha chiuso Lively, il progetto ispirato a Second Life. Anche se questo era solo uno dei molti progetti di Google, il suo termine rappresenta un punto di svolta dalla rappresentazione alla realtà.
Nel 1978, Jerry Mander ha scritto in Quattro argomenti per eliminare la televisione (Quill, 1978; ed. italiana: Edizioni Dedalo, 1982):

Dopo centinaia di migliaia di generazioni, l’America, nello spazio di una sola generazione, è diventata la prima cultura ad aver sostituito l’esperienza diretta del mondo con suoi sostituti mediati e secondari. Interpretazioni e rappresentazioni vengono accettate come esperienze, e la maggior parte di noi ignora quale sia la differenza tra le due.

Trenta anni dopo, questo discorso non riguarda solo l’America e non è più solo relativo alla televisione. Il distacco dall’esperienza diretta si è fatto sempre più grande. La sostituzione della realtà con una rappresentazione mentale è anche stata una delle cause dell’attuale crisi finanziaria, perché ha creato una “ricchezza” illusoria dove le informazioni che attraversavano i cavi venivano considerate come beni reali.

Affermare che niente è reale è vero sia a livello neurofisiologico che spirituale. Tutti abbiamo sentito dire, in particolare nella tradizioni dell’Oriente, che il mondo è “maya”, apparenza e illusione. Inoltre, una delle posizioni ricorrenti delle persone che popolanoi mondi virtuali è mettere in dubbio la realtà affermando che “non c’è nulla di reale nella realtà”, poiché la nostra esperienza è in ogni caso mediata dai sensi e dal sistema nervoso i quali, a partire dal meccanismo stesso della visione, non fanno altro che interpretare la realtà. Secondo questo modo di pensare, possiamo dire che non esiste una realtà oggettiva e che forse non esiste nemmeno la realtà, in quanto ogni esperienza è mediata dal nostro sistema nervoso.

Tra i neuroscienziati, i tecnici creatori di mondi virtuali e gli insegnanti spirituali esiste un’apparente concordanza: tutti, in modi diversi, sostengono che il mondo è un’illusione.

È dai tempi del Buddha e di Platone, e anche prima di questi, ovvero molto prima che la scienza e la tecnologia entrassero nella nostra vita, che si parla del mondo come rappresentazione, a livello filosofico, metafisico, psicologico e spirituale. I filosofi e i mistici hanno espresso questo concetto in modo molto più sofisticato di qualsiasi ambiente software o tecnocrate.

[/it]

[en]

I can easily agree on the unreality of our experience, having myself been on a path of self-knowledge which involves meditation and inner inquiry. But I am afraid that those statements about the unreality of the world, coming from enthusiasts of virtual worlds, are another trick of the mind itself to feed its never-ending hunger.

Our human experience, however subjective and illusory it might be, is to live in the reality of matter and form. Living and becoming fully aware of our nature made up of body and mind will take us beyond matter, form, body, and mind. The next stage of evolution of human beings won’t be supported by living exclusively in the mind, in a disembodied “I think, therefore I am” environment, but through the involvement of mind, body, and awareness.

We will know whether it’s true or not that the mind does build the world if we know the mind’s mechanisms from the inside, becoming aware of the mind’s functionings. This quality of witnessing and observing the mind is quite different from becoming compulsively involved with the mind’s contents (whether those contents come from external media or from our own mental elaboration) or with virtual environments. Saying only intellectually that the world is a representation, just makes us withdraw and alienates us both from reality and from our inner experience. Affirming that “all is in the mind” has to come from a level beyond the mind and its illusory tricks. Otherwise we end up living in our mind only, without being in touch with reality, nor with our bodies nor with a higher awareness.

The goal of meditation is to be in touch with reality. Most people who ignore spiritual work believe that the spiritual path is something alien from reality, something which has to do with a world devoid of matter, passions, and everything worldly. After all, according to Christian beliefs, human beings came in the last stages of creation and are something different from and better than nature. According to this, temporarily borrowed by the earth, we are intended to go back to the heavenly realms in an afterlife where we will be a disembodied soul and the body, in turn, doesn’t have any role in the coming back to the spiritual realms: even more so, it can be a hindrance to spiritual development.

This created the misunderstanding that meditation and spiritual work in general are something “beyond” reality or maybe even a spaced out state. The opposite is true. Meditation and the path toward the truth are journeys toward reality which brings us in touch with our feelings, passions, sensations, and with the real nature of reality. We can’t leave the worldly level before having mastered it through our awareness. We can’t go beyond passions if we don’t become aware of them in their real and sensed nature. We also can’t go beyond the mind if we don’t observe and master the mind’s mechanisms.

The spiritual path is in a way scientific and very tangible. Rational thinking rejects spiritual work as something “unreal.” Instead, rational thinking is not rejected by the spiritual path; it can functional in spiritual inquiry and integrated with other modalities. However, when rational thinking is left alone, and when pushed to its extremes, it produces the technical and virtual worlds, getting farther from the real and the true, misplacing representation for reality.

Meditation is recognizing that we construct reality, recognizing that the mind and its products take us astray. But we can’t be aware of the unreality of the mind‘s beliefs just by saying it is from the intellectual level or by living in a simulated environment. Technology, rationality, the media and representation are very important milestones of human development, but more often than not, they become psychological defense mechanisms to reality itself and the associated unpredictability. Virtual environments give the illusion of a world we can control better.

For millions of years, as long as the world has been in existence, consciousness has been engaged in the play of form, of becoming the ‘dance’ of [a] phenomenal universe, ‘lila.’ And then consciousness becomes tired of the game [chuckle] (Eckhart Tolle interviewed by John W. Parker in Dialogues with Emerging Spiritual Teachers, Fort Collins: Sagewood Press, 2000).

As engineers of virtual environments we substitute ourselves to Consciousness and we enjoy the game of lila too, until Consciousness itself becomes tired of the game and merges with an individual consciousness. When the game is over, even the player is no more.

If I want to penetrate beyond my mind and see what is there, it is a mystery. It is unknowable, completely: one hundred percent unknowable. It is so unknowable that the moment you begin to get a glimpse of it, your mind is blown to smithereens. To realize that your mind lays a kind of curtain over things, a veil, a colored sheet with drawings on it that overlays our reality and says, “That is reality.” But the reality is beyond that: you open that curtain, open the window – and it is unknowable. If you truly look, you do not even know you are looking, and you disappear. Your mind is there, but nobody’s looking. The reality is there and you do not say there is mind or there is reality. And then, what you perceive, although it is mysterious, it is unknowable, we give it a name. We call it truth, we call it God, we call it reality (A. H. Almaas, Indestructible Innocence, Diamond Heart Book Four, Berkeley: Diamond Books, 1990).

If Lively is no more, the real world – while still there’s one for us – will enjoy our attentions and care. That’s perhaps the best reality show.

See also:

A thousand nuances lost by one emoticon

Mail Goggles

Internet and the weakening of central (inner) organizations

Spiritual powers through technology

The Tao of Google ranking

Virtual worlds and Maya 2.0

[/en][it]

Non ho difficoltà a riconoscere l’irrealtà della nostra esperienza, in quanto io stesso ho seguito un cammino basato sulla meditazione e la ricerca interiore. Temo però che le affermazioni sull’irrealtà del mondo provenienti dagli appassionati dei mondi virtuali siano un altro trucco della mente, per soddisfare la sua insaziabile fame.

La nostra esperienza umana, per quanto soggettiva e illusoria, consiste nel vivere nella realtà della materia e della forma. Vivere e divenire pienamente consapevoli della nostra natura composta di mente e corpo ci porterà al di là di materia, forma, corpo e mente. Il prossimo stadio dell’evoluzione umana non accadrà vivendo esclusivamente nella mente, in una sorta di impersonale “Io penso, quindi sono”, ma usando mente, corpo e consapevolezza in modo integrato.

Sapremo se è vero o no che la mente crea il mondo quando conosceremo i meccanismi della mente dal suo interno, diventando consapevoli del suo funzionamento. Il processo dell’essere testimoni ed osservare la mente è molto diverso dall’identificazione compulsiva con i contenuti mentali (a prescindere dal fatto che tali contenuti vengano da media esterni o dalla nostra elaborazione mentale) o con gli ambienti virtuali.

Limitarsi a dire a livello intellettuale che il mondo è una rappresentazione serve solo ad allontanarci e alienarci dalla realtà e dalla nostra esperienza interiore. L’affermazione “tutto è nella mente” deve giungere da un livello oltre la mente e i suoi trucchi illusori. Altrimenti ci ritroviamo a vivere solo nella nostra mente, senza mai entrare in contatto con la realtà né con il nostro corpo e neppure con una consapevolezza più elevata.

Lo scopo della meditazione è entrare in contatto con la realtà. La maggior parte delle persone che non conoscono il lavoro spirituale ritiene che il cammino spirituale sia qualcosa di estraneo alla realtà, relativo a un mondo privo di materia, senza passioni ed estraneo da ciò che è mondano. Dopo tutto, secondo la fede cristiana, gli esseri umani sono comparsi negli ultimi stadi della creazione e sono qualcosa di migliore e diverso dalla natura. In accordo a questa dottrina, siamo stati temporaneamente presi in prestito dalla Terra, ma il nostro destino è tornare al cielo dopo la morte, come anime incorporee e il corpo, da parte sua, non ha alcun ruolo nel processo di ritorno verso i livelli spirutuali: piuttosto, può essere un ostacolo allo sviluppo spirituale.

Ciò ha creato il fraintendimento che la meditazione e il lavoro spirituale in generale siano qualcosa “oltre” la realtà o addirittura uno stato da sballati. È vero l’opposto. La meditazione e il cammino verso la verità sono percorsi verso la realtà e ci portano in contatto con i nostri sentimenti, passioni, sensazioni, oltre che con la natura autentica della realtà. Non possiamo abbandonare la dimensione mondana prima di averla padroneggiata attraverso la nostra consapevolezza. Non possiamo andare oltre le passioni se non diventiamo consapevoli di esse, nella loro natura reale e sensoriale. Infine, non possiamo andare oltre la mente se non ne osserviamo e padroneggiamo i meccanismi.

Il cammino spirituale è, in un certo senso, scientifico e molto concreto. Il pensiero razionale rifiuta il lavoro spirituale come qualcosa di “irreale”. Al contrario, il pensiero razionale non è rifiutato dal cammino spirituale: esso può essere funzionale alla ricerca spirituale ed integrato da altre modalità. Ma se il pensiero razionale resta isolato ed è spinto agli estremi, produce i mondi tecnologici e virtuali, allontanandoci da ciò che è vero e reale e sostituendo la realtà con una sua rappresentazione.

Meditazione vuol dire riconoscere che noi costruiamo la realtà, che la mente e i suoi prodotti ci portano fuori strada. Ma non possiamo diventare consapevoli dell’irrealtà delle credenze mentali semplicemente dicendolo o vivendo in un ambiente simulato. La tecnologia, la razionalità, i media e la rappresentazione sono importanti pietre miliari nello sviluppo umano, ma spesso diventano meccanismi psicologici di difesa contro la realtà e la sua imprevedibilità. Gli ambienti virtuali danno l’illusione di un mondo che possiamo controllare meglio.

Da milioni di anni, da quando il mondo esiste, la consapevolezza partecipa al gioco della forma, del divenire la «danza» di un universo fenomenico, «lila». Ma poi la consapevolezza si stanca del gioco [risata] (Eckhart Tolle intervistato da John W. Parker in Dialogues with Emerging Spiritual Teachers, Fort Collins: Sagewood Press, 2000).

In quanto ingegneri virtuali, anche noi ci sostituiamo alla Consapevolezza e partecipiamo al gioco di lila, fino a quando la Consapevolezza stessa si stanca del gioco e si fonde con una consapevolezza individuale. Quando il gioco è finito, nemmeno il giocatore esiste più.

Se voglio penetrare al di là della mia mente e vedere cosa c’è, è un mistero. È totalmente inconoscibile, al cento per cento. È tanto inconoscibile che, non appena ne hai un bagliore, la mente va in mille pezzi. Comprendi che la mente getta sugli oggetti una sorta di tenda, di velo, di lenzuolo colorato con dei disegni, dicendo: “Questa è la realtà”. Ma la realtà è al di là di essa: se apri quella tenda, apri la finestra… E sei di fronte all’inconoscibile. Se guardi davvero, non sai nemmeno di stare guardando, e scompari. La tua mente è presente, ma nessuno sta guardando. La realtà è presente, ma tu non dici che c’è la mente o la realtà. E poi a ciò che percepisci, benché sia misterioso e inconoscibile, assegni un nome. La chiamiamo verità, Dio, realtà (A. H. Almaas, Indestructible Innocence, Diamond Heart Book Four, Berkeley: Diamond Books, 1990).

Lively è morto, ma il mondo reale – finché per noi ce ne sarà uno – apprezzerà le nostre cure e attenzioni. Forse è questo il miglior reality show.

Vedi anche:

Mille sfumature perse per una emoticon

Mail Goggles

Internet e l’indebolimento delle organizzazioni centrali (interiori)

Poteri spirituali tramite la tecnologia

Il Tao del ranking di Google

Mondi virtuali e Maya 2.0

[/it]

Overcoming our identification with the body has traditionally been a mystical path, but that took place after having had a fully integrated body-mind-soul connection and having become aware of the full range of emotions and bodily sensations.

The split between body and mind in our society is still present and is further pushed away by long computer use where our bodies are involved in a minimal way, removing the connection in a premature manner.

[/en][it]

Tradizionalmente, il superare l’identificazione col corpo era parte di un percorso mistico, ma questo avveniva dopo aver integrato completamente la connessione tra il corpo, la mente e l’anima e dopo essersi resi consapevoli di tutta le sfera delle emozioni e delle sensazioni corporee.

La scissione tra mente e corpo è tutt’ora presente nella nostra società e viene ulteriormente ampliata da un uso prolungato del computer dove i corpi sono coinvolti in modo minimale, togliendo la connessione in modo prematuro.

[/it]

[en]

Our sense of personal identities is much connected to the presence of our body and its feedbacks. Mystics say that when a person becomes spiritually enlightened, the connection with his body/mind is not the same as before since the identification with our limited structures is being replaced by a wider embrace.

When a man falls madly in love with God, who can we call his father, his mother, his wife? He loves God so intensely that he is now crazy for him. He no longer has duties, he’s free from his debts. What is this love frenzy? When a man reaches this state, he is no longer aware of his body to which in normal times is so closely connected. Chaitanya Deva experienced this. He fell into the sea without realizing it was the sea. And many times he fell on the ground. He no longer knew hunger, nor thirst, nor he needed sleep. He had completely lost the awareness of his body (his body awareness). Shri Ramakrishna. L’enseignement de Ramakrishna, 1963.

McLuhan foresaw that the new technological man will lose touch with nature as a direct experience and consequently lose his balance wheel, where “with or without drugs, the mind tends to float free into the dangerous zone of abstractions”. He envisioned a man who sits in front of his “informational control room”, receiving information from any place of the world, blowing up his ego while at the same time becoming schizophrenic, having the body in one place and his mind scattered in many places. This will split the connection with his body and threaten his identity:

A discarnate man is as weightless as an astronaut but can move much faster. He loses his sense of private identity because electronic perceptions are not related to a place. Caught up in the hybrid energy released by video technologies, he will be presented with a chimerical “reality” that involves all his senses at a distanted pitch, a condition as addictive as any known drug. The mind, as figure, sinks back into ground and drifts somewhere between dream and fantasy. Dreams have some connection to the real world because they have a frame of actual time and place (usually in real time); fantasy has no such commitment. At that point, technology is out of control. Marshall McLuhan, Bruce R. Powers. The Global Village. Oxford University Press. New York, 1989

Joseph Weizenbaum portrayed, much before the advent of the Internet, the compulsive programmers as technicians that

work until they nearly drop, twenty, thirty hours at a time. Their food, if they arrange it, is brought to them: coffee, Cokes, sandwiches. If possible, they sleep on cots near the computer. But only for a few hours – then back to the console or the printouts. Their rumpled clothes, their unwashed and unshaven faces, and their uncombed hair all testify that they are oblivious to their bodies and to the world in which they move. Joseph Weizenbaum. Computer Power and Human Reason. W. H. Freeman and Company. 1976

Not longer feeling the connection with our bodies in front of the computer is an experience that is shared by the majority of people that use computers for more than little time. This exclusion has their roots in the splitting of body and mind of the judeo-christian culture and is mostly welcomed by men rather then women.

Brenda Laurel, a human-computer interaction expert was interviewed by Susie Bright for her book Sexual Reality (Cleis Press. San Francisco. 1992) and expresses her views on the body and gender orientation around it:

I know from fifteen years experience with computer guys that we have a class of people we call nerds who are radically uncomfortable with their bodies and their sexuality. I’ve had men tell me that one of the reasons they got into this business was to escape the social aspects of being a male in America – to escape women in particular. These are nice guys – not nasty, just shy, dweeby guys. When men talk about virtual reality, they often use phrases like “out-of-body experience” and “leaving the body”. These guys are not talking about out-of-body experiences in the way that some Eastern mystic or Peruvian Indian would. They are talking about it in the sense that if you slap a screen over your eyes you won’t have to see air pollution. That is a Western industrial let’s-dominate-the-earth kind of mentality. When women talk about VR they speak of taking the body with them into another world. The idea is to take these wonderful sense organs with us, not to leave our bodies humped over a keyboard while our brain zips off down some network. The body is not simply a container for this glorious intellect of ours.

Alexander Lowen in his book Joy lamented that through the years he has seen a continuous deterioration in his patients’ bodies in terms of integration and aliveness, where “the old-fashioned hysterical patient that Freud wrote about is almost never seen. The hysterical person couldn’t handle his feeling; the schizoid individual hasn’t many. Most people today are dissociated from their bodies and live largely in their heads or egos. We live in an egotistic or narcissistic culture where the body is seen as an object and the mind as the superior and controlling power.”

Women are naturally more connected to their bodies and could drive men back to their own bodies as well but this connection is being threatened for both sexes through overemphasizing technological life and through a fast stressed lifestyle that does not give space to the slower pace of the body.

The connection with our bodies starts with the connection we had with our mother’s body and how this bond was developed. The productive and competitive society forces earlier mother-infant/child separations through child day care. Babies don’t get enough breastfeeding nor the necessary bonding through prolonged body contact. It has been demonstrated how early separations effect the developing brain in a way that inclines to mental pathologies. If we don’t get enough body contact we can’t get a vibrant connection with our bodies either.

Again, technology in some way seems to drive us towards the spiritual plane, in this case towards the overcoming of the body, but only in a pale reflection, prematurely and in a non-integrated way, with the actual opposite result of inhibiting the soul evolution through bypassing the stage of connecting with our bodies fully.

This is the first generation where people give less and less body contact to children for lack of time and attitude. Furthermore we spend more and more time indoor, on school or office desks, in front of computers with our bodies involved in a minimal way. Apart from the obvious health problems regarding cardiovascular diseases and obesity, our soul lacks the connection with the body in an integrated way.

The body screams for attention but most of what is given in our society is fitness programs and aesthetic surgeries, one more time, technologies.

See also:

Heavenly Technology

The Tibetan watch: how a spiritual teacher learned about technology in the West

Virtual worlds and Maya 2.0

Bytes and bites of the net

Computer addiction as survival for the ego

Programming and self de-programming

Metabolizing information

Wireless communication and reality mining as a reflection of pervasive consciousness

Multitasking to nothing

Virtual worlds, mirror worlds, Second Life: backing up the messed planet

Mechanisms, mysticism and Amazon Mechanical Turk

Zen archery and computers

Lifelogging

The heart of the binary code

Downloading our life on Internet

Porn 2.0

Sex black hole

[/en][it]

Il nostro senso di identità personale è strettamente associato alla presenza del corpo e ai suoi feedback. I mistici dicono che quando una persona diventa spiritualmente illuminata, il legame corpo/mente non è più lo stesso di prima, perché l’identificazione con le nostre limitate strutture è stata sostituita da una realtà più vasta.

Quando un uomo diventa folle d’amore per Dio, allora chi è suo padre, chi sua madre, chi sua moglie? Egli ama Dio tanto intensamente che ne è divenuto folle. Non ha più alcun dovere, è liberato da tutti i suoi debiti. Che cos’è questa follia d’amore? Quando un uomo giunge a questo stato, diventa incosciente perfino del proprio corpo, al quale è pur tanto legato in tempo normale. Chaitanya Deva conobbe ciò. Egli cadde nel mare, senza rendersi conto che era il mare. E molte volte cadde sul suolo. Non aveva più fame, né sete, né sonno. Aveva completamente perduto la coscienza del suo corpo. Shri Ramakrishna. Alla ricerca di Dio. Roma. 1963. Originale. L’enseignement de Ramakrishna.

McLuhan aveva previsto che il nuovo uomo tecnologico avrebbe perso l’esperienza diretta del con la natura e di conseguenza il suo elemente equilibrante, laddove “la mente tende a fluttuare libera nelle pericolose zone dell’astrazione, con o senza l’uso di droghe.” Aveva anche previsto un uomo che, seduto di fronte alla sua “stanza del controllo informatico”, ricevendo informazioni da qualunque luogo del mondo, gonfiando il proprio ego e contenporaneamente diventando schizofrenico, avendo il cropo da una parte e la mente sparpagliata in diversi luoghi. Questo avrebbe separato la connessione con il suo corpo e vedrebbe minacciato la sua identità:

L’uomo disincarnato diventa insensibile alla forza di gravità, come succede a un astronauta, ma diventa capace di muoversi molto più rapidamente. Egli perde il senso della propria individualità in quanto le percezioni elettroniche non sono legate a un luogo fisso. Immerso in questa energia ibrida emessa dalle tecnologie video, si troverà in una “realtà” chimerica che coinvolgerà al massimo grado tutti i suoi sensi, quasi come sotto l’effetto di una droga. La mente, come figura, si immerge nello sfondo, e viene trascinata in un luogo sconosciuto tra realtà e fantasia. I sogni sono legati al mondo reale perché hanno una struttura temporale e spaziale (di solito in tempo reale); la fantasia non ha tali legami. A questo punto la tecnologia risulta incontrollabile. Marshall McLuhan, Bruce R. Powers. Il villaggio globale. Sugarco. Milano. 1992.

Joseph Weizenbaum ha ritratto, molto prima dell’avvento di Internet, i programmatori coatti come tecnici che:

Lavorano fin quasi a crollare, venti, trenta ore per volta. Il cibo, se se ne ricordano, se lo fanno portare: caffè, coca-cola, panini. Se possibile, dormono su brande vicino al computer. Ma soltanto poche ore, poi di nuovo al terminale o agli stampati. I vestiti rattoppati, le facce non lavate e non rasate, i capelli spettinati dimostrano quanto si disinteressino del loro corpo e del mondo che li circonda.” Joseph Weizenbaum. Il potere del computer e la ragione umana. Edizioni Gruppo Abele. Torino. 1987.

Non sentirsi più collegati al proprio corpo mentre si è davanti al computer è un’esperienza comune alla maggioranza delle persone che usano quest’ultimo per un periodo di tempo non breve. Tale separazione ha radici nella scissione tra corpo e mente operata dalla cultura giudaico-cristiana e riguarda più gli uomini che le donne.

Brenda Laurel, un’esperta delle interfacce uomo-computer, nell’intervista rilasciata a Susie Bright per il libro Sexual Reality (Cleis Press, San Francisco, 1992), esprime così le sue idee sul corpo e le differenze tra i sessi riguardo questo argomento:

So, grazie a un’esperienza di quindici anni sulle persone che lavorano al computer, che esiste un tipo di individui, quelli che generalmente sono definiti “nerd”, i quali sono molto a disagio con il proprio corpo e la propria sessualità. Alcuni uomini mi hanno detto che una delle ragioni per cui hanno scelto questo lavoro è stata evitare gli aspetti sociali connessi al ruolo del maschio in America; in particolare, evitare le donne. Si tratta di bravi ragazzi che non sono sgradevoli, ma solo timidi e impacciati. Quando gli uomini parlano della realtà virtuale, usano spesso frasi come “esperienza fuori-dal-corpo” e “lasciare il corpo”. Queste persone non stanno parlando delle stesse esperienze extra-corporee dei mistici orientali o peruviani; nel loro caso, queste espressioni ricordano più uno schermo sugli occhi che permette di non vedere l’inquinamento dell’aria. È un tipo di mentalità industriale occidentale, del genere “dominiamo la terra”. Quando le donne parlano di realtà virtuale, intendono: “portare il corpo con sé in un altro mondo”. L’idea è quella di portare i nostri meravigliosi organi di senso con noi, non lasciare il corpo chino su una tastiera mentre il cervello naviga in qualche rete. Il corpo non è semplicemente un contenitore del tanto celebrato intelletto.

Alexander Lowen, nel libro Arrendersi al corpo: il processo dell’analisi bioenergetica (Astrolabio 1994), scrive di aver osservato, nel corso degli anni, un continuo deterioramento delle condizioni fisiche dei suoi pazienti, dal punto di vista dell’integrità e della vitalità, mentre «il vecchio tipo di paziente isterico, quello di cui parlava Freud, è praticamente scomparso. La persona isterica non è in grado di gestire i suoi sentimenti, mentre l’individuo schizoide non ne ha molti. Oggi la maggior parte delle persone sono dissociate dal proprio corpo e vivono soprattutto nella testa o nell’ego. Viviamo in una cultura egoista o narcisista, in cui il corpo è visto come un oggetto e la mente come l’autorità superiore e determinante».

Le donne sono naturalmente più connesse col corpo, e potrebbero riportare anche gli uomini al loro corpo, ma questa connessione è minacciata in entrambi i sessi da una vita eccessivamente tecnologica e stressante, che non dà spazio al ritmo più lento del corpo.

La connessione con il nostro corpo comincia dalla connessione che abbiamo avuto con il corpo materno, e dipende dal modo in cui si è sviluppato questo legame. La società produttiva e competitiva impone il distacco madre/neonato-figlio sia in ospedale appena dopo il parto che dopo tramite gli asili nido. I bambini non vengono allattati abbastanza al seno, né sviluppano sufficientemente il senso di legame tramite un prolungato contatto corporeo. È stato dimostrato come il distacco precoce abbia sul cervello un’influenza che può condurre a patologie mentali. Se non ci viene dato abbastanza contatto corporeo, non possiamo avere una connessione vibrante nemmeno con il nostro corpo.

Anche in questo caso la tecnologia sembra apparentemente condurci verso il piano spirituale, in particolare verso il superamento del corpo, ma solo mediante un pallido riflesso, in modo prematuro e non-integrato, ottenendo il risultato opposto di inibire l’evoluzione dell’anima, perché viene saltato lo stadio di piena integrazione con il corpo.

Questa è la prima generazione in cui le persone offrono sempre meno contatto ai bambini, per mancanza di tempo e della giusta predisposizione d’animo. Inoltre, passiamo sempre più tempo a casa, su banchi di scuola o scivanie di uffici, davanti al computer, costringendo i corpi a un’attività minima. A parte gli ovvi problemi di salute connessi alle malattie cardiovascolari e all’obesità, alla nostra anima manca una connessione integrata con il corpo.

Quest’ultimo chiede ardentemente attenzione, ma la nostra società offre quasi soltanto programmi di fitness o chirurgia estetica, ovvero altra tecnologia.

Vedi anche:

Tecnologie divine

L’orologio tibetano: come un insegnante spirituale venne a conoscenza della tecnologia in Occidente

Mondi virtuali e Maya 2.0

La morsa e i morsi della rete

La dipendenza da computer per la sopravvivenza dell’ego

Programmazione e de-programmazione di sè

Metabolizzare le informazioni

La comunicazione senza fili e il reality mining come riflesso della consapevolezza globale

Il multitasking: strafare per niente

Meccanismi, misticismi e Mechanical Turk di Amazon

Il tiro con l’arco Zen e i computer

Lifelogging

Il cuore del codice binario

Download della vita su Internet

Porno 2.0

Il buco nero del sesso

[/it]