The Digitally Divided Self: Relinquishing our Awareness to the Internet

ISBN 9788897233008
274 Pages – Format: 6″ x 9″ – $17.90 (discounted on Amazon)

It is nearly half a century since Marshall McLuhan pointed out that the medium is the message. In the interim, digital technologies have found an irresistible hook on our minds. With the soul’s quest for the infinite usurped by the ego’s desire for unlimited power, the Internet and social media have stepped in to fill our deepest needs for communication, knowledge and creativity – even intimacy and sexuality. Without being grounded in those human qualities which are established through experience and inner exploration, we are vulnerable to being seduced into outsourcing our minds and our fragile identities.

Intersecting media studies, psychology and spirituality, The Digitally Divided Self exposes the nature of the malleable mind and explores the religious and philosophical influences which leave it obsessed with the incessant flow of information.

I am deeply touched and extremely grateful to the people who took the time to read, support and endorse The Digitally Divided Self. Being my first English book, and basically self-published, I didn’t expect to receive many reviews, much less from such leading thinkers and writers – nor such positive responses.

It was also a surprise to find common interests around eastern spirituality with so many people into technology and media. This makes me hopeful for an evolution of the information society – from chasing external stimulation to inner explorations and silence.

Detailed table of contents, introduction and chapter 1.

Order on Amazon.

Praise for Digitally Divided Self

 “Quartiroli’s The Digitally Divided Self is a must read for anyone seeking to understand the ever-increasing hegemony of the digital world in the individual psyche. Drawing on diverse fields and traditions, the author analyzes numerous mechanisms by which IT separates us from ourselves. Readers stand to benefit from such an understanding that is a prerequisite for mounting a defense of one’s individuality.” —Len Bracken, author of several novels and the biography Guy Debord—Revolutionary

 ­“With great insight, Ivo Quartiroli captures the subtle as well as the gross impact that media use has on our individual and collective psyches. The challenge before all of us is how to adapt to the new technology in a healthy way that allows us to retain our essential humanity. He offers us a solution born of his experience and confirmed by neuroscience. This is a must read.” —Hilarie Cash, PhD, co-founder of reSTART: Internet Addiction Recovery Program

 “It is difficult to offer a spiritually based critique of today’s network culture without sounding like a nostalgic Luddite crank. Immersed in the tech, but also in various meditative traditions, Ivo Quartiroli is the perfect person to offer integral wisdom-tech with clarity and bite.” —Erik Davis, author of Techgnosis and Nomad Codes: Adventures in Modern Esoterica.

  “Aware of the profound and rapid psychological and social metamorphosis we are going through as we ‘go digital’ without paying attention, Ivo Quartiroli is telling us very precisely what we are gaining and what we are losing of the qualities and privileges that, glued as we are to one screen or another, we take for granted in our emotional, cognitive and spiritual life. This book is a wake-up call. Steve Jobs and Bill Gates should read it.” —Derrick de Kerckhove, Professor, Facoltà di sociologia, Università Federico II, Naples, former Director of the McLuhan Program in Culture and Technology.

 “The Digitally Divided Self alerts us about the insidious dangers of our growing dependence on Information Technology. Ivo Quartiroli warns us that Internet can easily develop into an addiction that undercuts our connections with nature, with other people, and with our deeper inner reality. The spiritual nourishment coming from genuine relationships is then replaced by the empty calories of fake relationships, with the resulting deterioration of our personal and social lives. Using an incisive style, Ivo Quartiroli can be provocative, iconoclastic, at times exaggerated, but never boring. Behind each observation there are pearls of wisdom that are guaranteed to make you think.” —Federico Faggin, designer of the microprocessor.

 “Global culture is not only the latest step in the human evolutionary journey. It is also, as Ivo Quartiroli shows in The Digitally Divided Self, a critical opportunity to apply non-Western techniques of awareness to ensure healthy survival in the 21st century.” —Michael Heim, author of The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality, Virtual Realism, and Electric Language.

 “Question the merits of technology in the past and you’d be called a Luddite. But now technologists are leading the way toward a new, more balanced view of our gadget-driven lives. Drawing from his fascinating expertise in computer science and spirituality, Ivo Quartiroli presents a compelling critique of the corrosive impact of the Net on our humanity. It’s a warning we must heed.” —Maggie Jackson, author of Distracted: The Erosion of Attention and the Coming Dark Age.

“A profoundly premonitory vision of the future of the 21st century, The Digitally Divided Self unlocks the great codes of technological society, namely that the very same digital forces that effectively control the shape and direction of the human destiny are also the founding powers of a new revolution of the human spirit.” —Arthur Kroker, author of The Will to Technology and Canada Research Chair in Technology, Culture and Theory.

 “People today, especially young people, live more on the Internet than in the real world. This has subtle and not-so-subtle effects on their thinking and personality. It is high time to review these effects, to see whether they are a smooth highway to a bright interconnected future, or possibly a deviation that could endanger health and wellbeing for the individual as well as for society. Ivo Quartiroli undertakes to produce this review and does so with deep understanding and dedicated humanism. His book should be read by everyone, whether he or she is addicted to the Internet or has second thoughts about it.” —Ervin Laszlo, President, the Club of Budapest, and Chancellor, the Giordano Bruno Globalshift University.

 “The Mind-Body Split is a pervasive condition/affliction in the developed world, wholly un-recognized; yet fundamental to the great worldwide problems of health, environment, and economic inequity. Ivo Quartiroli’s Digitally Divided Self masterfully examines the effects of the insulated digital experience on the mind and the body self: exacerbating illusions and the Mind-Body Split; and contrasts it to the processes of self-discovery, growth, and healing: true inter-connectedness with nature, each other, and our selves. If the digital age is to solve our real problems, rather than create them, it will be with the knowledge contained in The Digitally Divided Self. Well done!” —Frederic Lowen, son of Alexander Lowen, Executive Director, The Alexander Lowen Foundation

 “Ivo Quartiroli here addresses one of the most pressing questions forced upon us by our latest technologies. In disturbing the deepest relations between the user’s faculties and the surrounding world, our electric media, all of them without exception, create profound disorientation and subsequent discord, personal and cultural. Few subjects today demand greater scrutiny.” — Dr. Eric McLuhan, Author and Lecturer

 “The internet is an extension of our central nervous system. When you operate a computer, you are extending yourself, through its interface, potentially all over the world, instantaneously. Extending yourself in such a disembodied, discarnate fashion only further entrenches your separateness, your ego self. In contrast, the introspective freeing from the physical through meditation also has the effect of creating a discarnate, disembodied state. That state is one that is progressively less identified with the ego self. This is the dichotomy that Ivo Quartiroli explores in The Digitally Divided Self. This book is well worth investigating.” —Michael McLuhan

 “We should all be asking the questions Ivo Quartiroli asks in this bold and provocative book. Whatever you think right now about technology, The Digitally Divided Self will challenge you to think again.” —William Powers, author of the New York Times bestseller Hamlet’s BlackBerry

 “It isn’t easy to find an informed and critical look at the impact of digital media practices on human lives and minds. Ivo Quartiroli offers an informed critique based in both an understanding of technology and of human consciousness.” —Howard Rheingold, author of The Virtual Community and Smart Mobs.

 “Ivo Quartiroli is mining the rich liminal territory between humans and their networks. With the integrity of a scientist and the passion of artist, he forces us to reconsider where we end and technology begins. Or when.” —Douglas Rushkoff, Media Theorist and author of Cyberia, Media Virus, Life, Inc. and Program or Be Programmed.

 “You might find what he writes to be challenging, irritating, even blasphemous and sacrilegious. If so, he has proven his point. The Internet, Ivo suggests, might just be the new opium of the masses. Agree with him or not, no other book to date brings together the multitude of issues related to how the seductions of technology impinge upon and affect the development of the self and soul.” —Michael Wesch, Associate Professor of Digital Ethnography, Kansas State University

  “The Digitally Divided Self is a refreshing look at technology that goes beyond the standard, well-worn critiques. Ivo Quartiroli charts new territory with a series of profound reflections on the intersections of computer science, psychology and spirituality.” —Micah White, Senior Editor at Adbusters magazine.

Detailed table of contents, introduction and chapter 1.

Order on Amazon.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: From Awareness of technology to technologies of Awareness .. 1
Chapter 2:“It’s only a tool” .. 17
Chapter 3: The Roots of It .. 39
Chapter 4: The Digitization of Reality .. 53
Chapter 5: Intimacy and Sexuality.. 73
Chapter 6: Commoditizing and Monetizing.. 89
Chapter 7: Politics, Participation and Control .. 97
Chapter 8: Come together: the Rise of Social networks.. 115
Chapter 9: Digital Kids ..125
Chapter 10: Literacy and the Analytical Mind.. 133
Chapter 11: Lost in the Current .. 143
Chapter 12: The Digitally Divided Self.. 165
Chapter 13: The Process of Knowledge .. 189
Chapter 14: Upgrading to Heaven .. 205
Chapter 15: Biting the Snake.. 223
Appendix: The People of Contemporary It and what Drives them.. 233

Introduction

Like many people nowadays, much of my personal and professional life is related to technology: I use the Internet for keeping the connection with my work projects and friends wherever I am in the world. I published the first book in Italy about the Internet. I run a blog and a Web magazine, do my investments online, shop on the Net, do interviews by email and Skype, and have even indulged in cybersex. Right now I’m in Asia developing this book – which is full of references to Web articles, blogs and material found only on the Internet – with online support: an editor and writing coach in California, copy editor in India, book designer in Italy, and a printing and distribution service with multiple locations in USA. My life is immersed in the digital loop.

I have been involved in IT since I was a student. As I learned meditation and explored spiritual paths, I developed an inner observer and discovered states beyond the mind. Thus, I found myself going back and forth between processing consciousness and information. Slowly my focus has shifted from what we can do with technology to what technology does to us. As a first-hand explorer, I’ve observed the subtle changes of our massive use of the Net.

Just as a spiritual researcher can go beyond the mind only after having observed and mastered it, it is necessary to enter the digital world to step beyond it. We can’t become aware of its effects without being engaged in it. Since digital technology is unavoidable now, we need to master it without becoming lost in it, using its tools with our full awareness.

In this time, the intensification of mental inputs is a phenomenon that must be kept in balance. Our contemporary culture does not acknowledge anything beyond the mind, but in other traditions the mental world is just one of the aspects of our wholeness. In the West a sort of Cartesian “pure thinking” has been given priority. Although the mind is the best-known organ of thought, it is not the only cognitive modality. Nervous systems have been discovered both in the heart and in the belly, and the global awareness that can be accessed by spiritual practitioners is pervasive and non-localized. Yet these modalities cannot be represented digitally, so they are relegated to the sidelines.

Our technological society militates against uninterrupted conscious attention. Several authors have documented the effects of IT on attention, literacy and intellectual skills. It also intrudes on the silent time needed to be aware of inner transformations. We don’t realize we have become servomechanisms of IT – precisely because IT has weakened the inner skills of self-understanding. Shrinking of the rich range of human qualities to privilege only those which can be represented and operated digitally arises from the nature of the ego-mind and our particular Western history which has engendered – then valued – mental representations of reality. My focus here is to understand why the mind can be lured by the magic of the tools, while forgetting the person who is using them.

We believe we are empowered individually and politically as we post articles on our blogs and participate in social networks. In actuality, we feed the machine with our “user-generated content” which becomes candy for advertisers who then design ads based on what we say on Twitter, Facebook, and even our emails.

Jumping from information to self-understanding is necessary if we are to regain real freedom, a freedom from conditioning of our mind and the manipulation by information – whether self-created or from external sources. We mistake the transmission of gigabytes of data for freedom.

In our advanced technological society there is a reticence to acknowledge the inner, spiritual or metaphysical dimensions of life. What cannot be calculated – which is, thereby, “not objective” – is considered unworthy of investigation. Even more strongly denied is the relationship between technology and the impact on our psyche. Technophiles declare that it’s only a tool, as if our psyche could remain untouched by continuous interaction with digital media, and as if we could control its impact on us. We can indeed be in control of digital media – but only after we become fluent in those cognitive modalities which can’t be reached by such media.

To be unaffected by digital media, we need a Buddha-like awareness with sustained attention, mindfulness and introspection. Yet these very qualities which are needed to break out of the automated mind are especially difficult to access when we are drowning in information – information that is predominantly ephemeral and transient, and which lacks a broader narrative. Awareness is what gives meaning and depth to information, but for awareness to expand we need to empty our mind. A story will illustrate this. A university professor approached a master to learn about Zen. Tea was served, but when the cup was full, the master did not stop pouring. The cup, like the professor’s mind with its concepts and positions, was full. It must first be emptied to understand Zen. So, too, for the digital world.

The world over, people using the Internet click on the same icons, use the same shortcuts in email and chats, connect with people through the same Facebook modalities. This is the globalization of minds. In the process of the digitization of reality, regardless of content, we use predominantly the same limited mental channels and interact with the same tools. We bring the same attitudes, gestures and procedures to working, dating, shopping, communicating with friends, sexual arousal, and scientific research. And most of these activities are impoverished by this phenomenon. Everything is seen as an information system, from the digitization of territory (like Google Earth and augmented realities software) to our biology.

Judeo-Christian culture places nature and the world of matter at man’s disposal. Acting on them is a way to garner good deeds and regain the lost perfection of Eden. In this culture that has considered miracles as proof of the existence of God, we have developed technologies that resemble the miraculous and the divine. We are compelled to welcome the advent of new technological tools with the rhetoric of peace, progress, prosperity and mutual understanding.

The telegraph, telephone, radio, TV and other media have been regarded as tools for democracy, world peace, understanding and freedom of expression. The Internet is just the latest in a succession of promising messiahs. Yet we don’t have more democracy in the world. In fact, big media and big powers are even stronger, while freedom of expression has ceded to control by corporations and governmental agencies. The Internet, like TV, will be entertaining, dumbing people in their own separate homes where they will be unable to question the system. The Internet might already be the new soma for a society experiencing economic and environmental degradation. But with the huge economic interests connected to it, criticizing its effect is akin to cursing God.

Many technological developments appeal to people because they answer psychological and even spiritual needs – like the quests for understanding and connection with others. Already digital technology has taken charge of truth and love – the drives which are distinctly human. Those primordial needs have been addressed, on the mental level, with information. Reflected only at that level, our soul is left empty with craving for the real qualities, and our mind is left restless, craving more information and chasing after satisfaction in vain.

The need to extend our possibilities through technology derives from the need to recover parts of ourself that were lost during the development of our soul – the states of sharp perception, fulfillment, and peace. Information technology (IT) also satisfies our ancient drives for power and control, even giving us several options with a simple click or touch of a finger.

The endless multiplication of information can keep the ego-mind busy – and thus at the center of the show. IT is the most powerful mental “pusher” ever created, feeding the duality of the ego-mind (which is symbolically mirrored by binary technology). More than TV whose attractions are framed between the beginning and ending time of a show, the Internet, video games, and smartphones have no structural pauses or endings. Hooked on a “real-time” stream of information, they take us farther away from both the real and the appropriate time frames.

The computer charms us by reflecting our mind on the Net. Like Narcissus, we mistake the reflected image and enter a closed loop, charmed by our reflection. The Internet, since the beginning, has been considered a technology which could crumble central governments and organizations. Perhaps that forecast was an external projection of what can happen inside us: disturbance of the integration of our psyches.

Meditation helps us recognize that we construct reality and that the mind leads us astray. Meditation is a path back to reality, to truth, to knowing and mastering our minds – instead of mastering the computer as a way to outsource our mind’s skills. It is a way to expand our awareness and join the other global “Net” – of awareness that permeates everything.

Though I am Italian, I am publishing this book for the English market because it is a post-digital book which can be better appreciated in countries where digital culture has spread throughout society. In Italy, one politically powerful tycoon owns most of the media, and uses it to demonize the Net. In that setting, being critical of the Net invokes the accusation of aligning with power to castrate freedom of expression, which is the polar opposite of my intention.

I welcome every medium which expands our chances of expressing ourselves, but I am aware that true self-expression can happen only when there’s a true self, which can hardly be shaped by screen media.

I am grateful to my spiritual teachers who opened new dimensions for my soul in my journey toward awareness, especially the intensity of Osho and the brilliant clarity of A. H. Almaas. I thank my copy editor Dhiren Bahl (www.WordsWay-Copyediting.com) for his painstaking corrections of my English text and my editor David Carr (www.MovingWords.us) for his clarifications and stylistic improvements. I’m grateful to my friends, too many to list here, for the numerous talks bringing together heart and mind in sharing our passion for truth.

Detailed table of contents, introduction and chapter 1.

Order on Amazon.

The ordinary human mind works mostly as a mechanism based on past conditionings. And it becomes even more mechanical through interacting continuously with machines. So there’s little surprise that some well-written software can infer with good accuracy who we are, what we want, which website we will visit, where we will go next while on the street. Google knows of every Web page we visit, every advertisement we click on and probably—with their mathematical and analytical tools that can interpret location, web navigation, connections with people, and email messages—much more than we can imagine.

In case our behaviour can’t be predicted, Google can always tell us what we should do, because, in Schmidt’s words, people “want Google to tell them what they should be doing next”, as reported by Nicholas Carr¹. As much as his words are unnerving, there’s, again, more than a hint of truth in them. Our will and inner direction are activated by the connection with our “belly center”—that place which any martial arts practitioner moves from.

This center is weakened by overusing the mind without a felt, alive and aware connection with the body, which is the ground for our search for truth. Lacking this connection, we seek guidance from technology even for the most basic decisions, just as we ask Google for anything which could be retrieved with a little effort by our memories.

This transforms all of us into helpless babies needing suggestions or confirmation from Mother Google for all our activities. Or at best into rebellious teenagers ignoring her hints, but showing up at dinner time.

Possessive mothers want their children to be dependent on them, not wanting them to grow up, seducing them with their tastiest dishes (free and entertaining software tools) and providing for all of their needs—while resisting their children’s every effort to go out from home unsupervised. Anywhere we go we leave a trace for Google. The children, then, will never face the real world—nor their real selves.

¹. Brave New Google.

See also:  Mail Goggles
Mother Google
The Tao of Google Ranking
Google, Privacy and the Need to be Seen

Among the ones who grabbed my attention was Anthony Aguirre’s (Associate Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz) answer “The Enemy of Insight?” which reverberates with my reflections on knowledge and the inner mechanisms which insights are based on.

A passages from Anthony Aguirre’s answer:

I, like most of my colleagues, spend a lot of time connected to the Internet. It is a central tool in my research life. Yet when I think of what I do that is most valuable — to me at least — it is the occasional generation of genuine creative insights into the world. And looking at some of those insights, I realized that essentially none of them have happened in connection with the Internet…
I’ve come think that it is important to cultivate a ‘don’t know’ mind: one that perceives a real and interesting enigma, and is willing to dwell in that perplexity and confusion. A sense of playful delight in that confusion, and a willingness to make mistakes — many mistakes — while floundering about, is a key part of what makes insight possible for me. And the Internet? The Internet does not like this sort of mind. The Internet wants us to know, and it wants us to know RIGHT NOW: its essential structure is to produce knowing on demand. I don’t just worry that the Internet goads us to trade understanding for information (it surely does), but that it makes us too accustomed to to instant informational gratification. Its bright light deprives us of spending any time in the fertile mystery of the dark.

The attitude of not-knowing is been shared by good science and by spiritual researchers as well, two worlds who usually tend te be considered far apart. Descartes itself is his Discourse on the Method started his philosophical investigation with a not-knowing attitude which made him find his first principle of the philosophy “I think, therefore I am”.

Let’s see what the spiritual teachers say about not-knowing. Sri Aurobindo said, regarding the enlightened mind: “One is in an unutterable state of truth without understanding anything about it – simply, it is.” (Satprem. Sri Aurobindo, or the Adventure of Consciousness. Harper & Row. New York. 1974.)

Nisargadatta Maharaj:

When consciousness mixes with itself, that is samadhi. When one doesn’t know anything – and doesn’t even know that he doesn’t know anything – that is samadhi. (Nisargadatta Maharaj. Prior to Consciousness. Talks with Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj. Acorn Press. Durham. 1985. p. 6)

Then Osho:

This is the the ultimate paradox of mysticism: with not-knowing you can reach knowing and through knowing yiu lose it. Not-knowing is superior to any knowledge. Universities make you learned but when you enter the Buddhafield of a spiritual Master you enter in an anti-university. In the university you harvest more and more knowledge, information and you accumulate. In the anti-university of a Master you unlearn more and more… until the moment you don’t know anything anymore. (Osho. Theologia Mystica. Rebel Publishing House. 1983)

And Almaas:

Why am I here? Where am I going? We need to see how honest we can be with ourselves when trying to answer these questions. These two questions are related; that is, most people think they are here because there is a goal, they want to go somewhere. Where do you want to go? You probably think you know; do you? Do you think I know where you should go? If you think I know, can I tell you? And if I tell you, will you follow? Can you follow? These are questions that you cannot answer with your mind. These are questions that should remain questions. Do not try to simply answer them mentally. These questions are like a flame. If you answer them with your mind, you will put out the flame, because the mind doesn’t, the mind can’t know the answers to these questions. When you answer them with your mind and you think you know, the question is gone. When you believe you have answered such questions, the flame is gone and there is no more enquiry. (A.H. Almaas. Being and the Meaning of Life (Diamond Heart Book Three). Diamond Books. Berkeley. 1990. p. 1)

Even neurophysiologically a stage of not-knowing is needed for getting the “Eureka effect”. Being in the unknown is uncomfortable for the mind, our ego identifies mostly with what we know. Knowing reassures us too.

So whenever we have an itch to know anything we can search for it on google and quench our thirsts. However, this way, as Almaas say, “the flame is gone” and good meals sometimes require a slow long cooking, better if on flames rather than electricity.

But Google works hard for avoiding any darkness and delays in his answers, wanting to “help” computers understand language.

How often do you try to chat with somebody and they don’t respond because they just walked away from their computer? Or maybe you’re in the middle of chatting with them just as they need to leave. But you still need to tell them something – something really important like you’ve moved, where you’re meeting…or ice cream! We need ice cream! This is why we built a way to chat with your friends even when they’re away from their computers. Now you can keep the conversations going with a new Labs feature that lets you send SMS text messages right from Gmail. It combines the best parts of IM and texting: you chat from the comfort of your computer, and your friends can peck out replies on their little keyboards.

It is quite amazing to read so many words in a single paragraph which convey the meaning of need, abandonment, attachment, nourishment. The whole passage reminds one of a baby who doesn’t want to get detached from the  person who provides care and attention. Our primary object-relationships are being transferred to technology and, Mother Google provides us her umbilical cord and the milk to nourish us.

I don’t believe in conspiracy theories and I don’t think that those words have been chosen carefully to manipulate people’s psyches. The digitalization of reality has gone so far that we are now substituting every human need, even the most basic ones, with technology. So those words are just the natural outcome of our intimate relationship with technology.

This feature of Google will be a panacea for anxious people who can’t detach themselves from the machine and the people whom they chat with and need to keep the connection.

Of course, people can block or stop the SMS messages at any time, but the silence of becoming isolated from the Net could become too eerie to bear. The pressures of the unknown neglected inner self asking for attention will probably be pacified again with some gadget connected to the big mama-net with its sweet bytes flowing down reminding us that we aren’t isolated anymore.

If we look at the academic level, the Economist published an article titled “Great minds think (too much) alike” where research by James Evans, a sociologist at the University of Chicago, is introduced, whose work has been published in Science. The conclusion of his work says that, “as more journals become available online, fewer articles are being cited in the reference lists of the research papers published within them. Moreover, those articles that do get a mention tend to have been recently published themselves. Far from growing longer, the long tail is being docked.” The long tail is a term coined by Chris Anderson in 2004 to define the niche markets which the Web can approach, where unique products take an important commercial value.

Evans discovered instead that the great variety of papers available on the Net, far from widening the range of quoted sources, actually gave privilege to the ones already well known and even more to the most recent ones, probably the easiest to find searching in Google.

On the commercial level, New Scientist published the article “Online shopping and the Harry Potter effect” writing that “big sellers have never been bigger… Andrew Bud from the cellphone software company mBlox have analysed a year’s worth of downloads from a well-known internet music store. They found that of the 13 million tracks available, 52,000 – just 0.4 per cent – accounted for 80 per cent of downloads”.

New Scientist explains the phenomenon as, “easy digital replication and efficient communication through cellphones, email and social networking sites encourage fast-moving, fast-changing fads. The result is a homogenisation of tastes that boosts the chances of popular things becoming blockbusters, making the already successful even more successful.”

This has been confirmed experimentally by Duncan Watts, a sociologist at Columbia University, New York.

Together with his colleagues Matthew Salganik and Peter Dodds, he tested the effect of communication and peer approval on the musical tastes of 14,000 teenage volunteers recruited online (Science, vol. 311, p. 854;). A set of 48 songs was made available to all the volunteers, who could download whichever songs they wanted. The researchers split the volunteers into eight groups; in some, group members could see what their peers were downloading, but in others they had no such knowledge. In the socially connected groups, the winner took all: popular songs became more popular, unpopular songs more unpopular. This effect was much less pronounced in the socially isolated groups.

Watts thinks that information overload makes us more dependent on other people’s opinions to find out what we like. Then New Scientist asks, “why, when we have so much information at our fingertips, are we so concerned with what our peers like? Don’t we trust our own judgement?”

In another article, a psychologist finds Wikipedians grumpy and close-minded. In a psychological test, Wikipedians, as expected, “were more comfortable online than in the real world” but they, surprisingly, scored low even on agreeableness and openness.

During an Italian conference dedicated to music on the Net, one boy asked the speaker, “We can download the complete discography of any artist, but the problem is: What do we like?” An interesting question, which gives the real point of the matter.

Choices are connected with our personality; choices are bridges between our inner view and an external event. We can make the right choices for ourselves only when we can listen to ourselves deep enough to access the essence of our personality and join it to the outer life. But in order to do that we need both a solid personality which we are aware of and, some quiet and empty time to look into ourselves instead of following just external inputs. Both states are quite hard to access in online life.

We tend to believe that information can construct our personality and give us an individuality. We identify ourselves mostly with what we know, with our thoughts and beliefs, in another world with what fills our mind. But those aspects are as fragile and unreal as the financial derivatives market. The ideas and beliefs which fill our minds are essentially the products of our familiar and cultural conditionings, which give the ego the illusion of being “somebody” with its unique peculiarities.

Information, detached from experience, detached from a felt inner view and detached from an ethical background, mostly reinforces our conditionings instead of opening our minds to new areas. Neil Postman, in Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology (New York: Vintage Books, 1993, p. 63), wrote:

Information is dangerous when it has no place to go, when there is no theory to which it applies, no pattern in which it fits, when there is no higher purpose that it serves.

The mind’s main job and hobby is to separate, to discriminate, and to judge. It gives us a powerful way to read and act on reality which gave science and technology the strongest roles in our culture. Unless mind is subordinated to a broader (we could say spiritual) awareness, is non-inclusive by nature. In this view it is not surprising to know that online, we tend to stay in our territory with what is already known and accepted by our minds. Our social connections online can surely broaden minds too but mostly, as happens with other media, they promote uniformization.

Actually, we experience the paradox of both uniformization and the explosion of differences; Lee Siegel expressed this paradox as one “must sound more like everyone else than anyone else is able to sound like everyone else” (Against the Machine, New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2008, p. 73).

The source of this apparently contradictory phenomenon is in the ego itself, which does need to be recognized and accepted by people but at the same time feel different from anyone else in order to prove its specialness. Commercially, we are presented with millions of choices to let us think we are unique but then people tend to choose what is known or anyway what is known by somebody we want to be connected with and recognized by, much as teenagers are dependent on the peer group’s opinions.

When we are presented with millions of commercial options and we choose one we delude ourselves in thinking we are recognizing ourselves and building a part of our individuality. The market, as the Situationists had already seen in the 1950s, first takes away our real needs of connection and authenticity, then illudes us in giving what we need, but in a pale reflection of the real, making us always thirsty for a ‘real’ which will never come.

The variety expressed on the Web is well developed and important and will expand even more, but it seems that the force toward variety turned back into concentration of sources of information, as Nicholar Carr said in an interview for The Sun magazine.

It was once believed that the Web was essentially centrifugal: that it pushed people away from big, central sources of information to millions of small, independent sources scattered throughout the network. But it turns out that centripetal forces – forces that draw us back to the big power centers – are also strong on the Web. Big sites have big advantages, and they seem to get stronger over time. The Net’s Wild West days are coming to an end. The trend now is more toward the consolidation of traffic and power than toward their diffusion.

Our choices about information can come from our depth if we allow ourselves to sense our very depth. The more we swallow information the less we are able to make real choices. We can’t make real choices because we don’t listen to ourselves; and we don’t listen to ourselves because the capacity of our inner attentional muscles is never exercised and it becomes weak by attending only external inputs mostly of short bits of information with no broad view. When we can’t approach our inner self or when the very habit of looking inside becomes weakened, we can only consign our choices to the mass or perhaps just to the faster website. In this way we identity more with the contents of information poured into our minds and less with our essential qualities.

One of the mantras of the Internet is that there aren’t barriers of social status, religion, country, ideology. This is true of our possibility to access any kind of information on the Net, but the more we identity ourselves with our mind’s contents, the more we erect defenses against extraneous information which would shake our mind’s structures and therefore our very identity. The real broadening of the mind can happen when we don’t identify with our mind’s beliefs and ideas, but with our felt inner qualities which are being supported by the observation of our mind’s processes and by the acceptance of the emptiness of our mind.

Google recently discontinued Lively, the Second Life-like project. Even though that’s only one out of many of Google’s projects, it’s symbolic of a turning point from representation to reality.

In 1978, Jerry Mander in Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television (Quill, 1978) wrote:

In one generation, out of hundreds of thousands in human evolution, America had become the first culture to have substituted secondary, mediated versions of experience for direct experience of the world. Interpretation and representations of the world were being accepted as experience, and the difference between the two was obscure for most of us.

Thirty years later, it is not just about America and not just about TV. The detachment from direct experience grew layers. The attitude of substituting reality with mental representation was also one of the causes of the current financial problems, which constructed the illusionary “wealth,” considering information flowing through the cables as real goods.

Affirming that nothing is real is true both on the neurophysiological and spiritual levels. We have all heard that, especially in the Eastern traditions, the world is “maya,” an appearance, or illusion. Also, one of the mantras of people who populate the virtual worlds is to question reality saying that “there is nothing real in reality” since our experience is in any case mediated by our senses and by our nervous system which, starting from the mechanism of vision itself, only interprets reality. Following this line of thought we can say that there’s no objective reality and perhaps there’s no reality too, since every experience is mediated by our nervous system.

There’s an apparent concordance between neuroscientists, technical creators of virtual worlds and spiritual teachers. All of them, in different ways, say that the world in an illusion.

Since the times of Buddha and Plato, that the world is our representation has been a philosophical, metaphysical, psychological and spiritual assumption much before science and technology came into our lives. Philosophers and mystics expressed this in a much more sophisticated way than any software environment or technocrat.

[/en][it]

Recentemente, Google ha chiuso Lively, il progetto ispirato a Second Life. Anche se questo era solo uno dei molti progetti di Google, il suo termine rappresenta un punto di svolta dalla rappresentazione alla realtà.
Nel 1978, Jerry Mander ha scritto in Quattro argomenti per eliminare la televisione (Quill, 1978; ed. italiana: Edizioni Dedalo, 1982):

Dopo centinaia di migliaia di generazioni, l’America, nello spazio di una sola generazione, è diventata la prima cultura ad aver sostituito l’esperienza diretta del mondo con suoi sostituti mediati e secondari. Interpretazioni e rappresentazioni vengono accettate come esperienze, e la maggior parte di noi ignora quale sia la differenza tra le due.

Trenta anni dopo, questo discorso non riguarda solo l’America e non è più solo relativo alla televisione. Il distacco dall’esperienza diretta si è fatto sempre più grande. La sostituzione della realtà con una rappresentazione mentale è anche stata una delle cause dell’attuale crisi finanziaria, perché ha creato una “ricchezza” illusoria dove le informazioni che attraversavano i cavi venivano considerate come beni reali.

Affermare che niente è reale è vero sia a livello neurofisiologico che spirituale. Tutti abbiamo sentito dire, in particolare nella tradizioni dell’Oriente, che il mondo è “maya”, apparenza e illusione. Inoltre, una delle posizioni ricorrenti delle persone che popolanoi mondi virtuali è mettere in dubbio la realtà affermando che “non c’è nulla di reale nella realtà”, poiché la nostra esperienza è in ogni caso mediata dai sensi e dal sistema nervoso i quali, a partire dal meccanismo stesso della visione, non fanno altro che interpretare la realtà. Secondo questo modo di pensare, possiamo dire che non esiste una realtà oggettiva e che forse non esiste nemmeno la realtà, in quanto ogni esperienza è mediata dal nostro sistema nervoso.

Tra i neuroscienziati, i tecnici creatori di mondi virtuali e gli insegnanti spirituali esiste un’apparente concordanza: tutti, in modi diversi, sostengono che il mondo è un’illusione.

È dai tempi del Buddha e di Platone, e anche prima di questi, ovvero molto prima che la scienza e la tecnologia entrassero nella nostra vita, che si parla del mondo come rappresentazione, a livello filosofico, metafisico, psicologico e spirituale. I filosofi e i mistici hanno espresso questo concetto in modo molto più sofisticato di qualsiasi ambiente software o tecnocrate.

[/it]

[en]

I can easily agree on the unreality of our experience, having myself been on a path of self-knowledge which involves meditation and inner inquiry. But I am afraid that those statements about the unreality of the world, coming from enthusiasts of virtual worlds, are another trick of the mind itself to feed its never-ending hunger.

Our human experience, however subjective and illusory it might be, is to live in the reality of matter and form. Living and becoming fully aware of our nature made up of body and mind will take us beyond matter, form, body, and mind. The next stage of evolution of human beings won’t be supported by living exclusively in the mind, in a disembodied “I think, therefore I am” environment, but through the involvement of mind, body, and awareness.

We will know whether it’s true or not that the mind does build the world if we know the mind’s mechanisms from the inside, becoming aware of the mind’s functionings. This quality of witnessing and observing the mind is quite different from becoming compulsively involved with the mind’s contents (whether those contents come from external media or from our own mental elaboration) or with virtual environments. Saying only intellectually that the world is a representation, just makes us withdraw and alienates us both from reality and from our inner experience. Affirming that “all is in the mind” has to come from a level beyond the mind and its illusory tricks. Otherwise we end up living in our mind only, without being in touch with reality, nor with our bodies nor with a higher awareness.

The goal of meditation is to be in touch with reality. Most people who ignore spiritual work believe that the spiritual path is something alien from reality, something which has to do with a world devoid of matter, passions, and everything worldly. After all, according to Christian beliefs, human beings came in the last stages of creation and are something different from and better than nature. According to this, temporarily borrowed by the earth, we are intended to go back to the heavenly realms in an afterlife where we will be a disembodied soul and the body, in turn, doesn’t have any role in the coming back to the spiritual realms: even more so, it can be a hindrance to spiritual development.

This created the misunderstanding that meditation and spiritual work in general are something “beyond” reality or maybe even a spaced out state. The opposite is true. Meditation and the path toward the truth are journeys toward reality which brings us in touch with our feelings, passions, sensations, and with the real nature of reality. We can’t leave the worldly level before having mastered it through our awareness. We can’t go beyond passions if we don’t become aware of them in their real and sensed nature. We also can’t go beyond the mind if we don’t observe and master the mind’s mechanisms.

The spiritual path is in a way scientific and very tangible. Rational thinking rejects spiritual work as something “unreal.” Instead, rational thinking is not rejected by the spiritual path; it can functional in spiritual inquiry and integrated with other modalities. However, when rational thinking is left alone, and when pushed to its extremes, it produces the technical and virtual worlds, getting farther from the real and the true, misplacing representation for reality.

Meditation is recognizing that we construct reality, recognizing that the mind and its products take us astray. But we can’t be aware of the unreality of the mind‘s beliefs just by saying it is from the intellectual level or by living in a simulated environment. Technology, rationality, the media and representation are very important milestones of human development, but more often than not, they become psychological defense mechanisms to reality itself and the associated unpredictability. Virtual environments give the illusion of a world we can control better.

For millions of years, as long as the world has been in existence, consciousness has been engaged in the play of form, of becoming the ‘dance’ of [a] phenomenal universe, ‘lila.’ And then consciousness becomes tired of the game [chuckle] (Eckhart Tolle interviewed by John W. Parker in Dialogues with Emerging Spiritual Teachers, Fort Collins: Sagewood Press, 2000).

As engineers of virtual environments we substitute ourselves to Consciousness and we enjoy the game of lila too, until Consciousness itself becomes tired of the game and merges with an individual consciousness. When the game is over, even the player is no more.

If I want to penetrate beyond my mind and see what is there, it is a mystery. It is unknowable, completely: one hundred percent unknowable. It is so unknowable that the moment you begin to get a glimpse of it, your mind is blown to smithereens. To realize that your mind lays a kind of curtain over things, a veil, a colored sheet with drawings on it that overlays our reality and says, “That is reality.” But the reality is beyond that: you open that curtain, open the window – and it is unknowable. If you truly look, you do not even know you are looking, and you disappear. Your mind is there, but nobody’s looking. The reality is there and you do not say there is mind or there is reality. And then, what you perceive, although it is mysterious, it is unknowable, we give it a name. We call it truth, we call it God, we call it reality (A. H. Almaas, Indestructible Innocence, Diamond Heart Book Four, Berkeley: Diamond Books, 1990).

If Lively is no more, the real world – while still there’s one for us – will enjoy our attentions and care. That’s perhaps the best reality show.

See also:

A thousand nuances lost by one emoticon

Mail Goggles

Internet and the weakening of central (inner) organizations

Spiritual powers through technology

The Tao of Google ranking

Virtual worlds and Maya 2.0

[/en][it]

Non ho difficoltà a riconoscere l’irrealtà della nostra esperienza, in quanto io stesso ho seguito un cammino basato sulla meditazione e la ricerca interiore. Temo però che le affermazioni sull’irrealtà del mondo provenienti dagli appassionati dei mondi virtuali siano un altro trucco della mente, per soddisfare la sua insaziabile fame.

La nostra esperienza umana, per quanto soggettiva e illusoria, consiste nel vivere nella realtà della materia e della forma. Vivere e divenire pienamente consapevoli della nostra natura composta di mente e corpo ci porterà al di là di materia, forma, corpo e mente. Il prossimo stadio dell’evoluzione umana non accadrà vivendo esclusivamente nella mente, in una sorta di impersonale “Io penso, quindi sono”, ma usando mente, corpo e consapevolezza in modo integrato.

Sapremo se è vero o no che la mente crea il mondo quando conosceremo i meccanismi della mente dal suo interno, diventando consapevoli del suo funzionamento. Il processo dell’essere testimoni ed osservare la mente è molto diverso dall’identificazione compulsiva con i contenuti mentali (a prescindere dal fatto che tali contenuti vengano da media esterni o dalla nostra elaborazione mentale) o con gli ambienti virtuali.

Limitarsi a dire a livello intellettuale che il mondo è una rappresentazione serve solo ad allontanarci e alienarci dalla realtà e dalla nostra esperienza interiore. L’affermazione “tutto è nella mente” deve giungere da un livello oltre la mente e i suoi trucchi illusori. Altrimenti ci ritroviamo a vivere solo nella nostra mente, senza mai entrare in contatto con la realtà né con il nostro corpo e neppure con una consapevolezza più elevata.

Lo scopo della meditazione è entrare in contatto con la realtà. La maggior parte delle persone che non conoscono il lavoro spirituale ritiene che il cammino spirituale sia qualcosa di estraneo alla realtà, relativo a un mondo privo di materia, senza passioni ed estraneo da ciò che è mondano. Dopo tutto, secondo la fede cristiana, gli esseri umani sono comparsi negli ultimi stadi della creazione e sono qualcosa di migliore e diverso dalla natura. In accordo a questa dottrina, siamo stati temporaneamente presi in prestito dalla Terra, ma il nostro destino è tornare al cielo dopo la morte, come anime incorporee e il corpo, da parte sua, non ha alcun ruolo nel processo di ritorno verso i livelli spirutuali: piuttosto, può essere un ostacolo allo sviluppo spirituale.

Ciò ha creato il fraintendimento che la meditazione e il lavoro spirituale in generale siano qualcosa “oltre” la realtà o addirittura uno stato da sballati. È vero l’opposto. La meditazione e il cammino verso la verità sono percorsi verso la realtà e ci portano in contatto con i nostri sentimenti, passioni, sensazioni, oltre che con la natura autentica della realtà. Non possiamo abbandonare la dimensione mondana prima di averla padroneggiata attraverso la nostra consapevolezza. Non possiamo andare oltre le passioni se non diventiamo consapevoli di esse, nella loro natura reale e sensoriale. Infine, non possiamo andare oltre la mente se non ne osserviamo e padroneggiamo i meccanismi.

Il cammino spirituale è, in un certo senso, scientifico e molto concreto. Il pensiero razionale rifiuta il lavoro spirituale come qualcosa di “irreale”. Al contrario, il pensiero razionale non è rifiutato dal cammino spirituale: esso può essere funzionale alla ricerca spirituale ed integrato da altre modalità. Ma se il pensiero razionale resta isolato ed è spinto agli estremi, produce i mondi tecnologici e virtuali, allontanandoci da ciò che è vero e reale e sostituendo la realtà con una sua rappresentazione.

Meditazione vuol dire riconoscere che noi costruiamo la realtà, che la mente e i suoi prodotti ci portano fuori strada. Ma non possiamo diventare consapevoli dell’irrealtà delle credenze mentali semplicemente dicendolo o vivendo in un ambiente simulato. La tecnologia, la razionalità, i media e la rappresentazione sono importanti pietre miliari nello sviluppo umano, ma spesso diventano meccanismi psicologici di difesa contro la realtà e la sua imprevedibilità. Gli ambienti virtuali danno l’illusione di un mondo che possiamo controllare meglio.

Da milioni di anni, da quando il mondo esiste, la consapevolezza partecipa al gioco della forma, del divenire la «danza» di un universo fenomenico, «lila». Ma poi la consapevolezza si stanca del gioco [risata] (Eckhart Tolle intervistato da John W. Parker in Dialogues with Emerging Spiritual Teachers, Fort Collins: Sagewood Press, 2000).

In quanto ingegneri virtuali, anche noi ci sostituiamo alla Consapevolezza e partecipiamo al gioco di lila, fino a quando la Consapevolezza stessa si stanca del gioco e si fonde con una consapevolezza individuale. Quando il gioco è finito, nemmeno il giocatore esiste più.

Se voglio penetrare al di là della mia mente e vedere cosa c’è, è un mistero. È totalmente inconoscibile, al cento per cento. È tanto inconoscibile che, non appena ne hai un bagliore, la mente va in mille pezzi. Comprendi che la mente getta sugli oggetti una sorta di tenda, di velo, di lenzuolo colorato con dei disegni, dicendo: “Questa è la realtà”. Ma la realtà è al di là di essa: se apri quella tenda, apri la finestra… E sei di fronte all’inconoscibile. Se guardi davvero, non sai nemmeno di stare guardando, e scompari. La tua mente è presente, ma nessuno sta guardando. La realtà è presente, ma tu non dici che c’è la mente o la realtà. E poi a ciò che percepisci, benché sia misterioso e inconoscibile, assegni un nome. La chiamiamo verità, Dio, realtà (A. H. Almaas, Indestructible Innocence, Diamond Heart Book Four, Berkeley: Diamond Books, 1990).

Lively è morto, ma il mondo reale – finché per noi ce ne sarà uno – apprezzerà le nostre cure e attenzioni. Forse è questo il miglior reality show.

Vedi anche:

Mille sfumature perse per una emoticon

Mail Goggles

Internet e l’indebolimento delle organizzazioni centrali (interiori)

Poteri spirituali tramite la tecnologia

Il Tao del ranking di Google

Mondi virtuali e Maya 2.0

[/it]

Last week, Google Labs introduced a new service, Mail Goggles. This service is intended to

prevent many of you out there from sending messages you wish you hadn’t… By default, Mail Goggles is only active late night on the weekend as that is the time you’re most likely to need it.

Headlined “Stop sending mail you later regret,” Mail Goggles, when enabled, will ask you a few simple math questions “after you click send to verify you’re in the right state of mind,” in other words, preventing you from sending an email while drunk or in any other altered state of mind.

Google, in addition to being motherly, feeding us with almost infinite information, now seeks to acquire a paternalistic role for itself by helping us in regulating and setting our limits. This simple software starts as usual in an innocent and low-profile manner, but marks the beginning of an intervention regarding our intentions and inner lives.

It would be interesting to know if Google keeps a record of our test results and what they would do with that information: show advertisements about alcohol addiction recovery or food supplements to protect from alcohol toxins?

The idea in itself is not bad. The time spent to solve a simple math problem can give space to a healthy pause and could divert our thoughts in another direction, letting us consider our message in a different light (though I doubt people who indulge in drinking will enable the feature or keep it enabled for long anyway). The last thing that the condition of alcohol unawareness wants is to stop, reflect, or stay in an empty space where running thoughts could be transformed and maybe melted by the emptiness (through a very low-tech activity called “meditation”).

[/en][it]

La settimana scorsa Google Labs ha introdotto il nuovo servizio Mail Goggles. Questo servizio è pensato per

prevenire molti di voi dal mandare messaggi che vorreste non aver mai mandato… Per default, Mail Goggles è solamente attivo nelle notti dei fine settimana in quanto questo è il momento in cui ne avrai molto probabilmente più bisogno.

Dal titolo “Smettila di mandare email di cui poi te ne pentirai”, Mail Goggles, quando attivo, chiederà di risolvere alcune semplici operazioni aritmetiche “dopo che si clicca su Invia per verificare che ti trovi nel corretto stato mentale”, in altre parole impedendo di mandare una email mentre si è ubriachi o in un altro stato mentale alterato.

Google, oltre ad essere materno nell’alimentarci con quasi infinite informazioni, ora inizia un ruolo paternalistico nell’aiutarci a regolare e definire i nostri limiti. Questo semplice software, nello stile di Google, come sempre inizia in modo innocente e senza molto clamore, ma segna l’inizio di un intervento in relazione alle nostre intenzioni e alla nostra vita interiore.

Sarebbe interessante sapere se Google tiene un archivio dei risultati dei nostri test e come intervengono su tali informazioni (mostrare pubblicità sulla guarigione da dipendanza alcoolica o dei supplementi alimentari che proteggono dalle tossine dell’alcool?)

L’idea di per sé non è male. Il tempo speso per effettuare delle semplici operazioni aritmetiche può dare spazio ad una pausa salutare, sviare i nostri pensieri in un’altra direzione e farci considerare il messaggio in un’altra luce. Tuttavia, dubito che le persone che si concedono all’alcool abiliteranno la funzione o che comunque la lasceranno attiva per molto. L’ultima cosa che l’inconsapevolezza dell’alcool vuole è quella di fermarsi, riflettere o di stare in uno spazio vuoto dove i pensieri che corrono potrebbero essere trasformati e magari sfumarsi nel vuoto (tramite un’attività a bassa tecnologia chiamata “meditatione”).

[/it]

[en]

Instead of using that time to do math calculations, I’d rather keep it void or use it for an inner enquiry, but there’s no technical way to let people stop the fast flow of thoughts which blind us. Any software is probably going to feed mental chatter rather than stop it. Only the development of our awareness “muscle” can stop our impulsiveness and unawareness.

Associating math capacities with moderation or reflection is indicative of a culture which associates rationality with anything good. Those capacities aren’t necessarily connected. For instance, I have always been familiar with numbers and won’t have any difficulty in answering the questions correctly even if quite drunk, but I probably won’t bother to take the test in such a condition anyway and would disable the feature.
However, answering the simple math questions won’t tell anything about my inner state. I can still be impulsive, angry, hurtful, or irrational. My capacity of being emphatic, reflexive and compassionate can be nil even after taking the test.

Anyway, probably just slowing down to take a test could help to be a bit more aware of the bits in the form of text we are sending. Just imagine if we sent the message through a traditional paper letter instead of by email. The time needed for organizing our thoughts, for writing with a pen (maybe we need to start from scratch if our writing doesn’t convey the right meaning) would force us in reflecting more. Then we need an envelope, stamps, and to write the address on the envelope. Then we need to walk and drop it somewhere.

I’m not saying that we should go back to snail mail, but the procedures involved in letter writing become a ritual which gives time to digest our intentions, ideas, feelings and distill the essence of our connection with the person. The ease with which we can send an email is not synchronized with the slower pace of time for reflection, which involves our thoughts, memories, feelings, and sensations. Biology doesn’t follow Moore’s Law where the processing speed doubles every two years.

Google did not explicitly say that the Mail Goggles service is intended for a drunk state. Alcohol or drugs aren’t the only means of getting an altered state. The late Friday night settings can work for somebody who arrives home drunk but just as well for anybody who spent the whole day online. Being online for many hours in a row brings a peculiar state of consciousness where our mind is not balanced any more by the wholeness of our bodies. We tend to be pulled by our thoughts in many directions with less filters and sometimes we prefer “fast” to “deep,” or “amazing” to “true.”

Thanks Google, for giving us a tool, though very rudimental, for being more aware of ourselves, but please don’t extend it in the wrong direction…a few versions later it could grow to reading physiological parameters like blood pressure, heart rhythm, cortisol levels, or neurological parameters like brain waves through simple and cheap devices connected to the computer, whose data could then be crossed with our web navigation and perhaps with our DNA.

[/en][it]

Invece di usare un tale tempo per i calcoli aritmetici, lo terrei semplicemente vuoto o lo userei per una esplorazione interiore, ma non esiste un artificio tecnico per far sì che le persone fermino il rapido flusso dei pensieri che ci acceca. Qualsiasi software probabilmente alimenterà ulteriormente il chiacchierio mentale invece di fermarlo. Solamente lo sviluppo del nostro “muscolo” della consapevolezza può arginare l’impulsività e l’inconsapevolezza.

L’associare capacità aritmetiche con la moderazione o la riflessione è indicativo di una cultura che associa la razionalità con qualsiasi cosa positiva. Tali capacità non sono necessariamente connesse. Ad esempio io ho sempre avuto una certa familiarità con i numeri e non avrei alcuna difficoltà nel rispondere correttamente anche in uno stato di forte ebbrezza, ma probabilmente non mi importerebbe di fare il test in una tale condizione e disabiliterei tale possibilità.

In ogni caso, rispondere ad alcune semplici esercizi aritmetici non dice niente a riguardo del mio stato interiore. Possono essere ancora impulsivo, incazzoso, offensivo e irrazionale. La mia capacità  di essere empatico, riflessivo e compassionevole può essere nulla anche dopo aver effettuato il test.

Comunque probabilmente il solo fatto di rallentare per fare un test potrebbe aiutare nell’essere un po’ più consapevoli delle parole che si stanno inviando. Immaginiamo ora se si dovesse spedire il messaggio tramite la posta ordinaria invece che via emal. Il tempo necessario per organizzare i nostri pensieri, per scrivere con una penna, magari ricominciare dall’inizio se il nostro scritto non trasmette le nostre intenzioni… tutto questo ci forzerebbe alla riflessione. Poi necessitiamo di una busta, francobolli e di scrivere l’indirizzo sulla busta. Quindi dobbiamo incamminarci per imbucarla.

Non sto dicendo che si dovrebbe ritornare alla posta ordinaria, ma che le procedure richieste dalla scrittura di una lettera tradzionale divengono un rituale che offee il tempo per digerire le nostre intenzioni, idee, emozioni e distillare l’essenza della connessione con la persona. La facilità con cui possiamo mandare una email non è sincronizzata con il ritmo lento della riflessione, che coinvolge i nostri pensieri, memorie, emozioni, sensazioni. La biologia non segue la legge di Moore dove la velocità di elaborazione raddoppia ogni due anni.

Google non ha affermato esplicitamente che il servizio Mail Goggles è da intendersi in caso di stato di abbrezza. L’alcool o le droghe non sono gli unici modi per entrare in uno stato alterato. Le impostazioni del venerdì notte possono funzionare per qualcuno che arriva a casa ubriaco ma anche per chiunque abbia passato tutta la giornata online. Rimanere online per parecchie ore di fila porta a un peculiare stato di coscienza dove la nostra mente non è più bilanciata dalla totalità del nostro corpo. Tendiamo ad essere trainati dai nostri pensieri in molte direzioni, con meno filtri e talvolta preferiamo “veloce” a “profondo” oppure “sorprendente” a “vero”.

Grazie Google per averci dato uno strumento, seppur molto rudimentale, per la nostra consapevolezza, ma non farti prendere la mano… in poche versioni potrebbe trasformarsi nella lettura di parametri fisiologici come la pressione sanguigna, il ritmo cardiaco, i livelli di cortisolo o parametri neurologici quali le frequenze cerebrali, tramite semplici e poco costosi dispositivi connessi al computer, i cui dati potrebbe poi essere incrociati con la nostra navigazione web e con il nostro DNA.

[/it]

The methods of tracing and controlling our Internet activities have become constantly more varied and sophisticated. Cookies are probably the oldest method (since 1994) to trace – mainly for advertising purposes – the websites that are visited.

Governments, not only in dictatorships but also in Western countries control every piece of information that passes through the Net. One of the famous projects is Echelon, which gives access to every information sent on email, instant messaging and telephone. Beyond this, the police as well can have access to the data regarding Internet use in order to monitor users.

But on the whole we are accomplices to the information that we send. Google History keeps track of all the search we do on the Net. Google Desktop and similar services index everything that happens in our computer.

RSS readers like Google Reader know our interests by managing our subscriptions to blogs. Tracing cancellations and new subscriptions, it is possible for them to map the way our thoughts evolve.

As if this were not enough, we expose ourselves directly in social networking sites, forums, and blogs with our written words and our photos. Sometimes, we need this for getting an identity on the Net in exchange for some attention from others.

[/en][it]

Le tecniche di tracciamento e controllo della nostra attività su Internet sono sempre più variate e sofisticate. I cookies sono forse il modo più vecchio, fin dal 1994, per tracciare i siti che vengono visualizzati, perlopiù per scopi pubblicitari.

I governi, non solo dei paesi dove vige la dittatura, ma di tutto l’occidente controllano ogni flusso di informazioni che transita sulla rete. Famoso è il progetto Echelon, tra gli altri, che dà accesso ad ogni informazione mandata via email, telefono e instant messaging. Ad aggiungersi a questi, gli organi di polizia possono accedere ai dati di utilizzo della rete per monitorare gli utenti.

Ma perlopiù siamo complici delle informazioni che trasmettiamo. Google History tiene traccia di tutte le ricerche che eseguiamo in rete. Google Desktop e servizi simili indicizzano tutto quanto avviene sul nostro computer.

I lettori RSS tipo Google Reader conoscono i nostri interessi gestendo le nostre iscrizioni ai blog. Con le cancellazioni e le nuove iscrizioni possono tenere traccia di come si evolve il nostro pensiero.

Se non bastasse, ci esponiamo direttamente nei siti di social networking, nei forum, nei nostri blog con le parole scritte e con le nostre foto. A volte ci serve per darci un’identità in rete in cambio di un po’ di attenzione da parte di altri.

[/it]

[en]

Combining different bits of information regarding our browsing habits, Google or others can know the threads of our mind in a much more precise way than we know them ourselves. Monitoring the search trends on the Net and subscriptions to blog feeds, Google can know the topics toward which global attention is moving, and it can work out fairly accurate ideas of how collective thought evolves. Such data in the hands of a politician or an advertising company can be precious.

In the global village of the Net, just as in small villages, everything is known about everybody.
The will to read our minds is not limited by online activities. Neuromarketing uses the most refined equipment, such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) in order to understand how purchasing decisions are made, and, consequently, how to direct them.

There are also some projects for mapping all the neural connections of the brain which in the end will get into the hands not only of advertising men but others too. And what should we say about Microsoft projects for monitoring the productivity even at the physiological level?

Microsoft is developing Big Brother-style software capable of remotely monitoring a worker’s productivity, physical wellbeing and competence. The Times has seen a patent application filed by the company for a computer system that links workers to their computers via wireless sensors that measure their metabolism. The system would allow managers to monitor employees’ performance by measuring their heart rate, body temperature, movement, facial expression and blood pressure.

The perspectives of the intersections between the technological possibilities and the will to control by those who own such instruments can lead to a capacity of level of control that is unprecedented.

The response to this invasion and mental colonization is for us to have, in turn, a capacity for controlling our thoughts that has no widely-known precedent, a consciousness of ourselves that is superior to the software skills used in tracing our preferences, psychographies and mental tendencies. In other words, to know ourselves, applying to our thoughts what in the Hindu tradition is called jnana yoga, the way of knowledge.

This means observing the course of our thoughts, what attracts us, what suggestions we are amenable to, and how the transition from one idea to another takes place. The instruments of Google, which trace and store the paths of our browsing, searches and online activities, might even be used for deconstructing our mental conditioning, as a tool for letting go of our identifications with the thoughts that are present in our mind, in a sort of reverse engineering of our minds.

The movement of free software has generously developed free shared applications, using the Net’s resources for supplying many users with non-commercial tools, often better than the commercial ones.
The next challenge for technological freedom will be on an inner level in addition to the technical level. Our skills will have to be applied in observing our minds more than directing them to the production of software and contents.

It will be necessary to become the masters of our minds without letting ourselves getting manipulated by the increasing number of inputs. Probably, like yogis, we’ll have to control our physiology as well (heart rate, blood pressure, etc.), which could be monitored, as in a Microsoft patent.

The more we are unaware of the subtle mechanisms of our minds, the more we’ll react mechanically to the inputs in our lives. The more we react mechanically, the more predictable we are. The more we are predictable, the more we are prone to be colonized internally by software, by market products, and by the politicians. The more we know ourselves, the more we observe the flows of our thoughts as as if they were external happenings – and we can choose whether to follow or simply witness them.

[/en][it]

Combinando diverse informazioni sulle nostre abitudini di navigazione, Google o altri possono conoscere i fili conduttori della nostra mente in modo molto più accurato di quanto li conosciamo noi stessi. Monitorando i trend delle ricerche in Rete e gli abbonamenti ai feed dei blog, Google può conoscere i temi su cui si sposta l’attenzione globale e può farsi un’idea piuttosto accurata di come si evolve il pensiero collettivo. Tali dati in mano a un politico o un pubblicitario potrebbero essere preziosi.

Nel villaggio globale della Rete, come nei piccoli villaggi, si sa tutto di tutti.

La volontà di leggere nella nostra mente non si limita all’attività online. Il neuromarketing utilizza le apparecchiature più raffinate, quali la risonanza magnetica funzionale per capire come vengono prese le decisioni per gli acquisti, e di conseguenza come dirigerle.

Vi sono anche dei progetti per mappare tutte le connessioni neurali del cervello che alla fine andranno in mano ai pubblicitari e non solo. E che dire dei progetti di Microsoft per monitorare la produttività addirittura su un piano fisiologico:

Microsoft sta sviluppando un software in stile Grande Fratello, in grado di monitorare da remoto la produttività di un lavoratore, il suo stato di benessere e la sua competenza.  The Times ha visto una richiesta di brevetto da parte dell’azienda per un sistema informatico che collega i lavoratori ai loro computer via sensori wireless che misurano il loro metabolismo. Il sistema darebbe agli amministratori del sistema la capacità di monitorare le performances degli impiegati misurando i battiti cardiaci, la temperatura corporea, i movimenti, le espressioni facciali e la pressione sanguigna.

Le prospettive dell’incrocio tra possibilità tecnologiche e volontà di controllo da parte di chi possiede tali strumenti possono portare a una capacità di controllo senza precedenti.

La risposta a questa invasione e colonizzazione mentale è di avere a nostra volta una capacità di controllo dei nostri pensieri senza precedenti, una consapevolezza di noi stessi superiore alle capacità dei software nel tracciare le nostre preferenze, psicografie e tendenze mentali. In altre parole, conoscersi, applicare ai nostri pensieri ciò che nella tradizione hindu è chiamato jnana yoga, la via della conoscenza.

Osservare quindi i percorsi dei nostri pensieri, da cosa siamo attratti, a quali suggestioni siamo sensibili, come avvengono i passaggi tra un’idea e l’altra. Gli strumenti di Google, che memorizzano i percorsi delle nostre navigazioni, ricerche e attività potrebbero anche essere usati per de-costruire i nostri condizionamenti mentali, per disidentificarci dai pensieri che sono presenti nella nostra mente, in una specie di reverse engineering della nostra mente.

Il movimento del software libero ha generosamente sviluppato delle applicazioni gratuite e condivise, utilizzando le risorse della rete per fornire strumenti non-commerciali a molti utenti, spesso di qualità migliore dei prodotti commerciali.

La prossima sfida verso la libertà tecnologica sarà sul piano interiore oltre che sul livello tecnico. Le nostre abilità dovranno applicarsi sull’osservazione della nostra mente più che a dirigerle verso la produzione di software e contenuti.

Bisognerà diventare padroni della nostra mente senza lasciarci manipolare dagli input sempre più numerosi. Dovremo magari anche poter, come degli yogi, controllare la nostra fisiologia (battiti cardiaci, pressione arteriosa e altro) che potrebbe essere monitorata come nel brevetto di Microsoft.

Più siamo inconsapevoli dei meccanismi sottili della nostra mente e più reagiremo meccanicamente di fronte agli input della vita. Più reagiamo meccanicamente e più siamo prevedibili. Più siamo prevedibili e più siamo soggetti a essere colonizzati interiormente dai software, dai prodotti di mercato e dai politici. Più ci conosciamo più osserviamo i flussi dei nostri stessi pensieri come fossero avvenimenti esterni e possiamo scegliere di seguirli o semplicemente testimoniarli.
[/it]

When I was a child I believed that somewhere, somebody had the answers to all my questions about the world and about existence. It was because of knowing that sooner or later even I would have access to that knowledge that quietened my cognitive anxiety.

The very fact that knowledge was present somewhere, though hidden, I felt it was certainly obtainable, as if it was present in the air and just needed the proper antennas for being picked up. The Web didn’t exist then, nor did Google that provides almost the entire repository of human knowledge, and of course neither did I know Rupert Sheldrake’s morphic fields theory, much less the mystical ideas on universal consciousness.

But what happens to the process that produces knowledge, when we get it instantly through a Google search? Any media, mentioning McLuhan, is at the same time an extension and a castration. Google is an extension and a castration concerning our research and answer-finding capabilities.

[/en][it]

Da piccolo mi confortava pensare che “qualcuno” da “qualche parte” avesse le risposte alle mie domande sul mondo e sull’esistenza. Immaginavo che in questo modo prima o poi anch’io avrei potuto accedere a tale sapere. Questo pensiero mi placava l’ansia conoscitiva.

Il fatto che la conoscenza fosse da qualche parte, per quanto nascosta o poco accessibile, la sentivo comunque come disponibile, come se questa fosse presente nell’aria e necessitasse solo delle antenne giuste per essere captata. A quei tempi non esisteva il web nè Google che ci mette a disposizione quasi l’intero scibile umano, naturalmente non conoscevo le teorie dei campi morfici di Sheldrake e tantomeno le parole dei mistici sulla coscienza universale.

Ma cosa succede al processo interiore della conoscenza quando possiamo accedervi in pochi instanti tramite una ricerca con Google? Ogni media, ricordando McLuhan, è allo stesso tempo un’estensione e una castrazione. Google lo è rispetto alla nostra capacità di ricercare e di trovare risposte.

[/it][en]

Through Google, we deceive ourselves in thinking we are getting real answers, we become restless if they don’t come quickly, so we halt the quest and the deeper research. Staying in a not-knowing state is uncomfortable. Knowledge gives us a false idea of control; it is a protection against the anxiety of the unexpected that is connected to the mystery.

The mind’s nature makes it uncomfortable with what is not known. Trying to know, or at least knowing that there is an answer comforts us, as happened to me as a child. Being satisfied with the answers given by virtue of technology, the passion for further search is extinguished. One of the qualities of an adult is the capability of staying in uncertainty.

Referring predominantly to external answers (even though we can become active in the search directing it from one link to another) could inhibit the deep concentration that represents the link between inner and outer knowledge.

If we look for practical information through Google then we don’t need to involve much of our inner world. However, as it often happens, search engines are being used as well for cultural, philosophical, and even existential or spiritual searches. In these cases the Net makes our attention jump from one piece of information to another without letting it settle in our inner world to metamorphose alchemically in the direction of experiential knowledge, rooted and connected to our individual truth.

Knowledge that can become part of our inner growth has a slow and deep connection with our unique mental ecosystem, as bacteria have with matter, where it can become transformed and grow.

The trend of search engines is to make queries more user-friendly. Still, a Google query requires an act of intuition from the user in expressing the terms being searched for. For an effective search, the inquirer has to apply his capabilities of discrimination, focused attention to the problem, and understanding of the subtleties of the language, as the information being searched for could be found connected to others in the most disparate ways.

It is this very attention to the knowledge astral field and to the collective mind that drives our individual awareness to meet another. The attention and the concentration on an issue themselves bring the resolution or the discovery, not as much the methods or the tools we use. The attention itself synchronically aggregates knowledge. Our awareness meets a similar one in the vicinity having affinity with ours by focusing our attention. In the end, it is awareness that meets itself. Attention that brings discoveries happens in fields as diverse as science, detective investigations, and inner knowledge.

Everything conspires for the user to make less effort in the search, but that effort is exactly what brings us in connection with the search field. The “I’m Feeling Lucky” button on Google allures us with the idea that our quest is about to end.

There is an ancient attraction for arriving at the end of a quest, the path that brings us inner spiritual realization. Every soul feels a call from that realization that would quieten the mind, even though the mind could be unaware of the very existence of that state.

Once you are inwardly integrated, outer knowledge comes to you spontaneously. At every moment of your life you know what you need to know. In the ocean of the universal mind all knowledge is contained; it is yours on demand. Most of it you may never need to know – but it is yours all the same (Nisargadatta Maharaj, I Am That, Acorn Press, Durham, 1982).

With those premises, who needs Google any more? The only trouble is that what Nisargadatta Maharaj means for being “inwardly integrated” is something that has more to do with being spiritually advanced rather than intellectually knowledgeable. Not a common state of being.

In a way, every search we pursue on the Net is ultimately about understanding ourselves. Our attention toward cultural, artistic, philosophical, and spiritual issues is connected with our soul and psyche. These need to be mirrored by similar other souls and psyches to develop to maturity.

The mind wants answers and wants them soon, while our spiritual nature is comfortable even in the not-knowing state, where the wonder state that is usually associated with babies is rediscovered but then integrated with the adult quality of awareness.

U. G. Krishnamurti, talking about his state beyond the mind, said:

This state is a state of not knowing; you really don’t know what you are looking at. I may look at the clock on the wall for half an hour – still I do not read the time. I don’t know it is a clock. All there is inside is wonderment: “What is this that I am looking at?” Not that the question actually phrases itself like that in words: the whole of my being is like a single, big question mark. It is a state of wonder, of wondering, because I just do not know what I am looking at. The knowledge about it – all that I have learned – is held in the background unless there is a demand. It is in the “declutched state”. If you ask the time, I will say “It’s a quarter past three” or whatever – it comes quickly like an arrow – then I am back in the state of not knowing, of wonder (The Mystique of Enlightenment, Dinesh Vaghela, India, 1982).

Descartes wrote about the passions of the soul and considered wonder as a passion/non-passion that doesn’t provoke any changes in the body, that is pure knowledge beyond the body, according to his famous cogito ergo sum.

Article 71. In this passion no change takes place in the heart or the blood. And this passion [wonder] has the following particularity: it is not observed to be accompanied, as the other passions are, by any change taking place in the heart and in the blood. The reason for this is that, not having good or evil as its object, but only knowledge of the thing wondered at, it has no relation to the heart and blood, which all the good of the body depends on, but only to the brain, where the organs of the senses are that contribute to this knowledge (Passions of the Soul, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, 1989).

Descartes asserts that in wonder there aren’t any typical movements of passion, since it doesn’t have good or evil as its object. Any time that we judge something as good or bad, this involves our physiology to some degree. But not with wonder, according to Descartes.

The main point I see in his affirmations is that in wonder there’s no involvement of good or evil. Wonder is a state of awareness preceding the duality that judges and divides. Therefore it is a state prior to the conceptual structures of the mind itself, which are developed during infancy based on the very first divisions between good and evil, between pain and pleasure.

As a psychosomatic unit, if the mind doesn’t have conceptual separations, not even the body is involved, what Descartes describes as “[wonder] has the following particularity: it is not observed to be accompanied, as the other passions are, by any change taking place in the heart and in the blood.” Attributing a psychosomatic proposition to Descartes (considered the father of the split between body and mind) can seem hasty, but in his last years, talking about love in Passions of the Soul, he writes:

Article 107. What the cause of these movements is in Love. And I deduce the reasons for all this from what has been said above: that there is such a connection between our soul and our body that when we have once joined some bodily action with some thought, one of the two is never present to us afterwards without the other also being present (Passions of the Soul, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, 1989 0872200353).

Coming back to knowledge and wonder, I can say that however valuable Google’s answers are, it is equally important to have the ability of staying in wonder and not-knowing, free from established conceptual structures. If, on one side, structures can widen our field of knowledge, on the other the widening happens anyway inside a channel which, however wide, is limited by conceptual banks.

Knowledge kills wonder, and in killing wonder it destroys your spirit of knowing, inquiry. Knowledge demystifies the universe – and a universe demystified is a universe without God. A universe demystified is a universe without poetry, without love, without music (Osho, The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha, Series 3, Rebel Publishing House, Cologne).

Meister Eckhart was a mystic in the Christian tradition, considered a heretic by the Church though very influential in the fourteenth century and later.

Teachers say that God is a being, a being gifted with intellect, who knows everything. But I say: God isn’t a being, He doesn’t have an intellect and He doesn’t know this or that. That way God is free from all things – therefore he is all things (Meister Eckhart).

Mystics of every age didn’t give to knowledge the same role that we give it nowadays, especially to judging and separating knowledge.

The knowledge of the ancients was perfect. How perfect? At that time, they did not know that there were things. This is the most perfect; nothing can be added. Next, they were aware of things, but they did not yet make distinctions between them. Next, they made distinctions, but they did not yet judge them. When judgements were passed, Tao was destroyed (Chuang-Tzu).

Much information has been produced since Chuang-Tzu’s times: less knowledge, much less wisdom. Paraphrasing Chuang-Tzu, I might say that when Google’s page ranking was formulated, everybody had to depend and contribute to the Tao-destroying judgments, making the resurgence of Tao even more difficult.

See also:

Facebook and the sorcerer’s apprentice of the Net

Neural reflexes and reflections on meditation

Disembodying at broadband speed

Heavenly Technology

The Tibetan watch: how a spiritual teacher learned about technology in the West

Virtual worlds and Maya 2.0

Bytes and bites of the net

Computer addiction as survival for the ego

Programming and self de-programming

Metabolizing information

Mental territories

Is Internet empowering us?

Wireless communication and reality mining as a reflection of pervasive consciousness

Multitasking to nothing

Biotech as an information system

Virtual worlds, mirror worlds, Second Life: backing up the messed planet

Mechanisms, mysticism and Amazon Mechanical Turk

Zen archery and computers

Lifelogging

The heart of the binary code

Downloading our life on Internet

Google, privacy and the need to be seen

Personal consumer

[/en][it]

Tramite Google ci illudiamo di avere vere risposte, diventiamo impazienti se non arrivano subito e in questo modo arrestiamo la ricerca e l’indagine profonda. Stare in una condizione di non-sapere è scomoda. La conoscenza ci dà l’illusione del controllo, è una protezione contro l’ansia dell’imprevisto che è connesso al mistero.

La natura della mente fa sì che non si trovi a proprio agio con ciò che non si conosce. Credere di conoscere o che comunque ci sia la risposta ci conforta come mi succedeva quando ero bambino. Accontentarsi delle risposte che ci danno le tecnologie sospende la ricerca, la fiamma viene spenta. Una delle qualità dell’essere adulti è la capacità di stare nell’incertezza.

Fare riferimento prevalentemente a risposte esterne, per quanto possiamo renderci attivi nella ricerca dirigendola da un link all’altro, potrebbe inibire la concentrazione profonda che fa da tramite tra la conoscenza interiore e quella esteriore.

Se cerchiamo informazioni di natura pratica con Google allora non necessitiamo di coinvolgere molta della nostra interiorità. Ma, come spesso avviene, i motori di ricerca vengono utilizzati anche per ricerche culturali, filosofiche quando non addirittura esistenziali o spirituali. In questi casi la struttura della rete ci porta l’attenzione a saltare da una informazione all’altra senza lasciarle depositare al nostro interno e farle trasformare alchemicamente nella direzione della conoscenza esperienziale, radicata e connessa alla nostra verità inviduale.

Una conoscenza che possa diventare parte della nostra crescita interiore deve passare da un contatto lento e profondo con il nostro unico ecosistema mentale, analogamente a quanto fanno i batteri con la materia, dove può traformarsi e crescere.

La tendenza dei motori di ricerca è quella di rendere le interrogazioni sempre più di facile uso. Tuttora una ricerca su Google richiede ancora un atto di intuizione da parte dell’utente nella formulazione delle parole cercate. Per una ricerca efficace, il ricercatore deve applicare le sue capacità di discriminazione, di attenzione mirata al problema e di comprensione delle sfumature del linguaggio, in quanto le informazioni cercate potrebbero essere trovate in connessione ad altre nei modi più disparati.

E’ questa stessa attentione al campo astrale della conoscenza e alla mente collettiva che dirige la nostra individuale consapevolezza a incontrarne un’altra. E’ l’attenzione e la concentrazione che si crea nei confronti di un problema che porta alla sua risoluzione o alla sua scoperta, non tanto i metodi o gli strumenti di cui facciamo uso. E’ la attenzione stessa che porta ad aggregare sincronicamente le conoscenza. E’ la nostra consapevolezza che per affinità si incontra con la sua simile. In ultima analisi, è la consapevolezza che incontra se stessa. L’attenzione che porta alla scoperta accade nei campi più diversi quali nella scienza, nelle indagini poliziesche e nella conoscenza interiore.

Tutto va nella direzione affinchè l’utente faccia meno fatica nelle ricerche, ma è esattamente questo sforzo che ci porta alla connessione con il campo della ricerca. Il bottone “Mi sento fortunato” di Google ci attrae con l’idea che la nostra ricerca è finalmente terminata.

C’è un richiamo antico riguardante l’arrivare al termine di una ricerca. La ricerca assoluta è il percorso che ci porta verso la realizzazione spirituale. Ognuno sente il richiamo di tale stato di realizzazione che placherebbe l’ansia della mente, anche se la mente stessa potrebbe essere ignara dell’esistenza di tale stato.

Nel momento in cui sei integro al tuo interno, la conoscenza esterna ti arriva spontaneamente. In ogni istante della tua vita conosci ciò di cui hai bisogno di sapere. Nell’oceano della mente universale è contenuta tutta la conoscenza: è tua a richiesta. La maggior parte di questa non avrai mai bisogno di conoscerla – ma ciò nonostante è tua. (Nisargadatta Maharaj. Io sono quello. Astrolabio. 2001).

Con queste premesse, chi ha ancora bisogno di Google? L’unico inconveniente è che ciò che Nisargadatta Maharaj definisce come “integro al tuo interno” è qualcosa che a che fare più con l’essere spiritualmente evoluto che avere una conoscenza intellettuale. Non è uno stato dell’essere molto diffuso.

In un certo senso, qualsiasi ricerca che intraprendiamo nella rete è in ultima istanza una ricerca per comprendere noi stessi. La nostra attenzione riguardo ai temi culturali, artistici, filosofici e spirituali è connessa con la nostra psiche e la nostra anima. La psiche e l’anima necessitano di rispecchiarsi nelle proprie simili affinchè possano crescere.

La mente vuole le risposte e le vuole subito, mentre la nostra natura spirituale è a suo agio anche nello stato di non-sapere, dove lo stato di meraviglia che normalmente associamo ai bambini viene ritrovato ma, in questo caso, integrato con le capacità di consapevolezza dell’adulto.

U.G. Krishnamurti, parlando del suo stato al di là della mente:

Questo è uno stato di non conoscenza: realmente non conosci quello che stai osservando. Posso guardare l’orologio appeso al muro per mezz’ora – eppure non leggo il tempo. Non mi rendo conto che si tratta di un orologio. Dentro di me c’è stupore: “Che cos’è questa cosa che sto guardando?”. Non che la domanda così come l’ho formulata adesso si presenti in parole: l’intero mio essere è come un unico grande punto interrogativo. E’ uno stato di stupore, di meraviglia, perché non conosco quello che osservo. La conoscenza – tutto quello che ho appreso – è mantenuta nel retroscena a meno che non sia necessaria. E’ in uno stato “disinnestato”. Se mi chiedete l’ora, io vi risponderò: “sono le tre e un quarto” o altro – viene improvvisamente come una freccia – per poi ritornare nello stato di non conoscenza, di meraviglia. (U.G. Krishnamurti. L’Inganno dell’illuminazione. Macro Edizioni. 2003. 8876160158)

Cartesio stesso, negli ultimi anni della vita, scrisse delle passioni dell’anima e considerò la meraviglia come una passione-non-passione, che non provoca mutamenti nel corpo, quindi pura conoscenza al di là del corpo, in accordo al suo famoso cogito ergo sum.

Articolo LXXI – Tale passione [la meraviglia] ha questo di particolare, che non si nota affatto che sia accompagnata da alcun mutamento che si verifichi nel cuore o nel sangue, come accade nelle altre passioni. La ragione di questo è che, non avendo per oggetto né il bene né il male, ma solamente la conoscenza della cosa che si ammira, essa non ha alcun rapporto con il cuore e con il sangue, dai quali dipende tutto il benessere del corpo, ma soltanto con il cervello, dove stanno gli organi dei sensi che servono a questa conoscenza. Cartesio. Le passioni dell’anima. UTET. Torino.

Cartesio afferma che nella meraviglia non c’è il movimento tipico della passione, non avendo per oggetto nè il bene nè il male. Ogni volta che diamo un giudizio di valore, questo coinvolge la nostra fisiologia a qualche livello. Ma non con la meraviglia secondo Cartesio.

Il punto fondamentale che vedo nella sua affermazione è che nella meraviglia non vi sia coinvolto né il bene né il male. La meraviglia si pone così come uno stato di consapevolezza precedente alla dualità che giudica e divide. E’ uno stato quindi precedente alle strutture concettuali della mente stessa, le quali nascono nella prima infanzia sulla base delle primissime divisioni tra bene e male, tra dolore e piacere.

In quanto unità psicosomatica, se la mente non ha separazioni concettuali, neanche il corpo viene coinvolto, ciò che Cartesio descrive come “[la meraviglia] ha questo di particolare, che non si nota affatto che sia accompagnata da alcun mutamento che si verifichi nel cuore o nel sangue”. Attribuire una affermazione psicosomatica a Cartesio, considerato il padre della separazione tra corpo e mente può sembrare azzardato, ma in tarda età, parlando dell’amore ne Le passioni dell’anima, afferma:

Articolo CVII – Qual è la causa di questi movimenti nell’Amore. Traggo le ragioni di tutto questo da quel che è stato detto sopra: vi è fra la nostra anima e il nostro corpo un legame tale che, una volta che abbiamo congiunto qualche azione corporea con qualche pensiero, l’una delle due cose non ci si presenta in seguito, senza che si presenti anche l’altra. Le passioni dell’anima. UTET. Torino. Originale: Les passions de l’âme.

Ritornando alla conoscenza e alla meraviglia, mi sento di affermare che per quanto siano importanti le risposte di Google, altrettanto importante è la capacità di rimanere nella meraviglia e nel non-sapere, un po’ più liberi dalle radicate strutture concettuali. Se le strutture da una parte allargano il campo della nostra conoscenza, dall’altro la ampliano comunque all’interno di un canale che per quanto largo viene limitato dagli argini concettuali.

La conoscenza uccide la meraviglia e uccidendo la meraviglia distrugge il tuo spirito di ricerca, la tua indagine. La conoscenza demistifica l’universo – e un universo demistificato è un universo senza Dio. Un universo demistificato è un universo senza poesia, senza amore, senza musica. Osho. La saggezza dell’innocenza. Commenti al Dhammapada di Gautama il Buddha Apogeo/Urra. Milano. 2007.

Meister Eckhart era un mistico della tradizione Cristiana, considerato un eretico dalla Chiesa; nonistante questo ebbe una grande influenza nel quattordicesimo esimo secolo e successivamente.

I maestri dicono che Dio è un essere, un essere dotato d’intelletto, e che conosce tutte le cose. Ma io dico: Dio non è essere, non è dotato d’intelletto e non conosce né questo né quello. Così Dio è libero da tutte le cose – e perciò è tutte le cose. Meister Eckhart. La via del distacco. Mondadori. Milano. 1995

I mistici di ogni epoca non diedero alla conoscenza lo stesso ruolo che gli diamo oggi, in particolare alla conoscenza che giudica e separa.

La conoscenza degli antichi era perfetta. Quanto perfetta? Innanzitutto, essi non sapevano che c’erano le cose. Questa è la conoscenza più perfetta; non si può aggiungere altro. Poi essi sapevano che c’erano le cose, ma non facevano ancora distinzioni tra di esse. Alla fine, essi fecero delle distinzioni tra di esse, ma non elaborarono ancora giudizi su di esse. Quando i giudizi furono elaborati, il Tao fu distrutto. Chuang-Tzu

Dai tempi di Chuang-Tzu è stata prodotta molta informazione, meno conoscenza e ancora meno saggezza. Parafrasando Chuang-Tzu potrei dire che quando fu istituito il page ranking di Google, tutti quanti hanno dovuto dipendere e contribuire ai giudizi che distruggono il Tao, rendendo la rinascita del Tao sempre più difficile.

Vedi anche:

Facebook e gli apprendisti stregoni della Rete

Riflessi neurali e riflessioni sulla meditazione

Rendendoci incorporei a velocità di banda larga

Tecnologie divine

L’orologio tibetano: come un insegnante spirituale venne a conoscenza della tecnologia in Occidente

Mondi virtuali e Maya 2.0

La morsa e i morsi della rete

La dipendenza da computer per la sopravvivenza dell’ego

Programmazione e de-programmazione di sè

Metabolizzare le informazioni

Territori mentali

Internet aumenta davvero il nostro potere?

La comunicazione senza fili e il reality mining come riflesso della consapevolezza globale

Il multitasking: strafare per niente

Le biotecnologie come sistema informativo

Mondi virtuali, mondi specchio, Second Life: fare il backup di un pianeta nel caos

Meccanismi, misticismi e Mechanical Turk di Amazon

Il tiro con l’arco Zen e i computer

Lifelogging

Il cuore del codice binario

Download della vita su Internet

Google, la privacy e il mettersi in mostra

Personal consumatore

[/it]

The need to colonize a territory and to own it traces back to an ancient survival instinct, that dragged on to modern times with the colonizations of other people’s lands. The new territories to be conquered are now at a mental level. The most coveted territory is now represented by having a good position in the ranking of search engines.

[/en][it]

Il bisogno di colonizzazione e di possesso di un territorio risale a un antico istinto di sopravvivenza, che si è trascinato fino all’epoca moderna con le colonizzazioni di luoghi altrui. I nuovi territori da conquistare sono ora a livello mentale. Il territorio più ambito è un buon ranking, un buon posizionamenti nei motori di ricerca.

[/it][en]

The need to colonize a territory and to own it traces back to an ancient survival instinct, that dragged on to modern times with the colonizations of other people’s lands. But the planet’s territories to be “conquered” came to an end so now, entering other people’s territory is an operation that might cause much trouble, even to the most powerful nations in the world.

If survival in terms of food and safe sheltering in the caves has now been satisfied, it doesn’t follow that the old conditioning has died down; it has only been transformed. The new territories to be conquered are now at a mental level. The most coveted territory is now represented by having a good position in the ranking of search engines. Besides from commercial reasons, although important, to be in pole position for the ranking of a certain word makes us feel like kings, although of a limited conceptual territory. We may feel like Confucius who re-defined the appropriate meanings of words. If we are recognized as authorities as far as a word or a concept are concerned, we have an undoubted power, marginal as it may be, over our small territory.

Therefore we feel at home and deeply rooted in a particular mental territory and this might become our starting springboard in the conquest of further territories. Also, being at the top of the ranking positions makes us feel in touch with the global mind, able to connect with the collective unconscious and even to influence it through the messages that appear on our web pages.

Having the control over our territory is an old instinct, just like the reproduction of our DNA. Fighting for the reproduction and protection of the progeny is one of the main factors in the making of sociality as neo-darwinists know so well. Our social identification is no longer just bound to the biological world, to the family and to the reproduction of our DNA; the way to reproduce ourselves now also exists on a mental level, the place where our identities are stronger .

Stoic philosophers used to consider the world as permeated by spermatikoi logoi, seminal reasons, inseminating verbs. Various mystic philosophies consider universal concepts and the universal mind like ubiquitous entities, that are like the bricks on top of which the most complex structures are built. Millions and millions of people who everyday search for words with Google and other search engines create an image of small particles of thought condensing over Google’s computer servers and thence bounce back fertilized by new information, which in turn generate further requests.

The competition for the first places within search engines, on a spiritual level, reflects the need to be aware of universal concepts and to meet the global mind, but as this need is combined with the ego’s needs (and the financial ones), we are content with attracting visitors to our website.

See also:

Neural reflexes and reflections on meditation

Disembodying at broadband speed

Heavenly Technology

The Tibetan watch: how a spiritual teacher learned about technology in the West

Virtual worlds and Maya 2.0

Bytes and bites of the net

Computer addiction as survival for the ego

Programming and self de-programming

Metabolizing information

Is Internet empowering us?

Wireless communication and reality mining as a reflection of pervasive consciousness

Multitasking to nothing

Biotech as an information system

Virtual worlds, mirror worlds, Second Life: backing up the messed planet

Mechanisms, mysticism and Amazon Mechanical Turk

Zen archery and computers

Lifelogging

The heart of the binary code

Downloading our life on Internet

Google, privacy and the need to be seen

Personal consumer

[/en][it]

Il bisogno di colonizzazione e di possesso di un territorio risale a un antico istinto di sopravvivenza, che si è trascinato fino all’epoca moderna con le colonizzazioni di luoghi altrui. Ma i territori del pianeta da “conquistare” sono finiti ed entrare in territori altrui è un’operazione che può provocare parecchi grattacapi, anche alle nazioni più potenti del mondo.

Se la sopravvivenza in termini di cibo e sicure caverne è stata soddisfatta, non per questo l’antico condizionamento si è placato; si è solamente trasformato. I nuovi territori da conquistare sono ora a livello mentale. Il territorio più ambito è un buon ranking, un buon posizionamenti nei motori di ricerca. Al di là dei motivi commerciali, pur se importanti, trovarsi ai primi posti della ricerca di una certa parola ci fa sentire re, seppur di un limitato territorio concettuale. Ci possiamo sentire come Confucio che aveva ridefinito i significati appropriati delle parole. Se veniamo riconosciuti come delle autorità a riguardo di una parola o di un concetto, per quanto marginale, abbiamo un potere indiscusso nel nostro piccolo territorio.

Quindi ci sentiamo radicati e a casa nostra in un particolare territorio mentale e questo può diventare un trampolino di partenza per conquistare ulteriori territori. Stare ai vertici delle posizioni dei motori di ricerca ci fa sentire anche in contatto con la mente globale, con la capacità di connettersi con un inconscio collettivo e addirittura di influenzarlo con i messaggi presenti nelle nostre pagine web. Come il controllo del territorio, la riproduzione del nostro DNA è un istinto antico. La lotta per la riproduzione e per la protezione della prole è uno dei fattori principali nella formazione della socialità come ben sanno i neodarwinisti. La nostra identificazione sociale non è più legata solamente al mondo biologico, della famiglia e della riproduzione del DNA; il modo di riprodurre noi stessi è ora sul piano mentale, luogo dove ci identifichiamo maggiormente.

I filosofi stoici ritenevano che il mondo fosse permeato da spermatikoi logoi, ragioni seminali, verbi inseminatori. Diverse filosofie mistiche parlano di concetti universali e di mente universale come di entità onnipresenti, che sono un po’ come i mattoni su cui si costruiscono le strutture più complesse. Decine di milioni di persone che ogni giorno cercano parole su Google e altri motori di ricerca creano un’immagine di minuscole particelle di pensiero che si condensano sui computer di Google e da lì rimbalzano fecondate da nuove informazioni, che a loro volta genereranno ulteriori richieste.

La competizione per i primi posti nei motori di ricerca su un piano spirituale è il bisogno di essere consapevoli dei concetti universali e il voler incontrare la mente globale, ma essendo questo bisogno combinato con le esigenze dell’ego (e quelle del fatturato), ci si accontenta di portare visitatori al nostro sito.

Vedi anche:

Riflessi neurali e riflessioni sulla meditazione

Rendendoci incorporei a velocità di banda larga

Tecnologie divine

L’orologio tibetano: come un insegnante spirituale venne a conoscenza della tecnologia in Occidente

Mondi virtuali e Maya 2.0

La morsa e i morsi della rete

La dipendenza da computer per la sopravvivenza dell’ego

Programmazione e de-programmazione di sè

Metabolizzare le informazioni

Internet aumenta davvero il nostro potere?

La comunicazione senza fili e il reality mining come riflesso della consapevolezza globale

Il multitasking: strafare per niente

Le biotecnologie come sistema informativo

Mondi virtuali, mondi specchio, Second Life: fare il backup di un pianeta nel caos

Meccanismi, misticismi e Mechanical Turk di Amazon

Il tiro con l’arco Zen e i computer

Lifelogging

Il cuore del codice binario

Download della vita su Internet

Google, la privacy e il mettersi in mostra

Personal consumatore

[/it]