Indranet » Technosoul

Reasons to Leave Facebook

Ivo Quartiroli — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:52:00 +0000

We are all familiar with active music bands, politicians, and actors, but we know much less about them after they change or stop their careers, resign, or retire. Often, however, the most interesting stories happen after someone consciously chooses a new life path.

Similarly, while participating in Facebook, we know almost everything about the people who are active, but we do not know much about the people who have slowed down their participation or left the site. There are at least as many reasons to slow down our commitment to or leave Facebook altogether than to be part of it.

If you are one of those who have chosen to not participate, to step down or take the full exit route from Facebook, please share your experience. Why did you leave Facebook? What were your concerns? Did anything happen to trigger your decision? I am collecting such experiences for an e-book about Facebook and about people’s attitudes toward social networks. The e-book will be free.

I am especially interested in exploring your story and the inner motivations that made you step away from Facebook. I will quote your words without exposing your name or email address. I only need to know your gender, approximate age, and nationality (which can be as generic as “Southeast Asian,” “South American,” “Northern European,” or “Middle Eastern”). Of course, you will receive a copy of the e-book. In some cases, I will edit your words for stylistic reasons, but will always respect your content.

Please send your experience to ivotoshan (at) yahoo (dot) it. It can be few lines or several pages long as you like. Anyway I will give it my full attention. In case I need greater clarification, I will ask you. Also, if you know somebody who might contribute to my research, please forward this message to them.

You can see my opinion about Facebook on the following articles,

Resisting Facebook

After a Few Months on Facebook

The Game of Facebook

Thanks for any help you might give to ths project.

Ivo

Reading Aloud

Ivo Quartiroli — Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:00:18 +0000

“The printed or mass-produced book discouraged reading aloud, and reading aloud had been the practice of many centuries. Swift, silent scanning is a very different experience from manuscript perusal, with its acoustic invitation to savor words and phrases in many-leveled resonance. Silent reading has had many consequences for readers and writers alike, and it is a phase of print technology which may be disappearing” (Marshall McLuhan in a 1972 interview, from Understanding Me, MIT Press, 2005).

If nowadays we see somebody reading aloud, we may think that he is not fully literate. But we are not surprised to see people talking aloud on their mobile phones on the streets.

The advent of silent reading, according to McLuhan, had consequences both for privacy and for developing an individual point of view. Through Internet technology, we are back reading louder and louder. When we share our readings on social media, we read as loud as to the whole world, but what is weakening is the connection of words to our inner selves. It seems that, to hear our voices, we have to hear it in the echo of other people’s feedback through social media.

We no longer feel an inner resonance of what we read but need it to be bounced back to us by the infinite reverberations of the Net.

The game of Facebook

Ivo Quartiroli — Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:20:47 +0000

In one of my rare Facebook appearances, I mumbled about the absurdity of spending more than an hour to carefully read (as it should be with people we care about) a friend’s updates of the last hour.

The last comment I received on my note (in Italian) was, “If you don’t like the game, just don’t play it.” This friend is very active on Facebook, sharing words, videos, links, and whatever. He is an artist and a spiritual researcher, a real friend with whom I have shared deep talks, meditation practices and fun, not a typical “friend” the way Facebook has redefined this word. I feel he has a big heart.

After a few days, I realized that I had often heard people who are in spiritual work say that Facebook is just a game, and you can play it, enjoy it, but you can keep detached, knowing that it is a game of the mind that can be enjoyed, but we do not have to become attached to it, much as an enlightened being who could see the activity of his mind just as ripples on the surface of his consciousness. Under this line of reasoning, consciousness is unaffected by those ripples.

I think there’s a deep misunderstanding under this assumption. As long as is true that an enlightened being is beyond the hiccups of the mind and can observe them as a witness rather than a participant, for the rest of us, being involved repetitively with a tool is going to affect our relationship to the tool itself, as well as to the people on the other side of the screen.

Despite the confidence that we can be stronger than whatever activity we do for many hours a day, the reality is that we can and often actually do become attached to the tool and to the repetitive tasks connected. Even spiritual researchers do. If we feed the body continuously with unhealthy food or chemicals, chances are that we are going to feel the consequences. This applies even to spiritually advanced people, since the body responds at least as much to mechanical stimuli as to a higher awareness. A higher consciousness is not a guarantee of long life or health on the physical level.

Many spiritual teachers say that the mind also is a mechanism, and that the body and mind are actually a body-mind pair, in which the mind isn’t any less mechanical than the body. Every spiritual researcher knows how the mind can be heavily conditioned by early experiences, external messages received, and even by the thoughts we produce. Those conditionings cloud our awareness and don’t allow our lives to flow freely.
One of the classic teachings for the liberation of the mind is not to be dragged by the never-ending chatter of the mind, which is a source of distraction, a barrier to inner exploration, and the silence from which insights and depth come.

Why shouldn’t the mind also be conditioned by Facebook, not only in terms of the content seen there, but especially by the way we interact, by the interface itself? While I have heard some people say that they look at Facebook’s messages in a “meditative way,” looking at the flow without becoming attached (and I wonder, anyway, if that is the non-attached view of a meditative mind or just plain indifference and boredom?), the interface and the way we communicate through Facebook is going to affect us more deeply than the actual content posted. We know since McLuhan’s time that “the medium is the message.”

The very way we communicate, through scrolling and clicking the mouse (or the touch screen), by having windows on the screen, by associating friends with small icons, and communicating basically on a mental level with no embodied presence while being distracted by other events on the same screen, is going to morph our inner meaning of friendship and communication. For younger people, this modality could even represent an inner imprinting.

Sites like Facebook tend to suck out our time and attention; they feed on our user-generated content, analyzing our words, messages, links, profiles, and friends for the sake of selling our data and attention to advertisers. We can for sure play such a “game,” but I would check first if I am the player or the one being played.

The Digitally Divided Self: Relinquishing our Awareness to the Internet

Ivo Quartiroli — Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:04:35 +0000

The Digitally Divided Self: Relinquishing our Awareness to the Internet is on Amazon.

ISBN 9788897233008
274 Pages – Format: 6″ x 9″ – $17.90 (discounted on Amazon)

It is nearly half a century since Marshall McLuhan pointed out that the medium is the message. In the interim, digital technologies have found an irresistible hook on our minds. With the soul’s quest for the infinite usurped by the ego’s desire for unlimited power, the Internet and social media have stepped in to fill our deepest needs for communication, knowledge and creativity – even intimacy and sexuality. Without being grounded in those human qualities which are established through experience and inner exploration, we are vulnerable to being seduced into outsourcing our minds and our fragile identities.

Intersecting media studies, psychology and spirituality, The Digitally Divided Self exposes the nature of the malleable mind and explores the religious and philosophical influences which leave it obsessed with the incessant flow of information.

I am deeply touched and extremely grateful to the people who took the time to read, support and endorse The Digitally Divided Self. Being my first English book, and basically self-published, I didn’t expect to receive many reviews, much less from such leading thinkers and writers – nor such positive responses.

It was also a surprise to find common interests around eastern spirituality with so many people into technology and media. This makes me hopeful for an evolution of the information society – from chasing external stimulation to inner explorations and silence.

Detailed table of contents, introduction and chapter 1.

Order on Amazon.

Praise for Digitally Divided Self

“Quartiroli’s The Digitally Divided Self is a must read for anyone seeking to understand the ever-increasing hegemony of the digital world in the individual psyche. Drawing on diverse fields and traditions, the author analyzes numerous mechanisms by which IT separates us from ourselves. Readers stand to benefit from such an understanding that is a prerequisite for mounting a defense of one’s individuality.” —Len Bracken, author of several novels and the biography Guy Debord—Revolutionary

“With great insight, Ivo Quartiroli captures the subtle as well as the gross impact that media use has on our individual and collective psyches. The challenge before all of us is how to adapt to the new technology in a healthy way that allows us to retain our essential humanity. He offers us a solution born of his experience and confirmed by neuroscience. This is a must read.” —Hilarie Cash, PhD, co-founder of reSTART: Internet Addiction Recovery Program

“It is difficult to offer a spiritually based critique of today’s network culture without sounding like a nostalgic Luddite crank. Immersed in the tech, but also in various meditative traditions, Ivo Quartiroli is the perfect person to offer integral wisdom-tech with clarity and bite.” —Erik Davis, author of Techgnosis and Nomad Codes: Adventures in Modern Esoterica.

“Aware of the profound and rapid psychological and social metamorphosis we are going through as we ‘go digital’ without paying attention, Ivo Quartiroli is telling us very precisely what we are gaining and what we are losing of the qualities and privileges that, glued as we are to one screen or another, we take for granted in our emotional, cognitive and spiritual life. This book is a wake-up call. Steve Jobs and Bill Gates should read it.” —Derrick de Kerckhove, Professor, Facoltà di sociologia, Università Federico II, Naples, former Director of the McLuhan Program in Culture and Technology.

“The Digitally Divided Self alerts us about the insidious dangers of our growing dependence on Information Technology. Ivo Quartiroli warns us that Internet can easily develop into an addiction that undercuts our connections with nature, with other people, and with our deeper inner reality. The spiritual nourishment coming from genuine relationships is then replaced by the empty calories of fake relationships, with the resulting deterioration of our personal and social lives. Using an incisive style, Ivo Quartiroli can be provocative, iconoclastic, at times exaggerated, but never boring. Behind each observation there are pearls of wisdom that are guaranteed to make you think.” —Federico Faggin, designer of the microprocessor.

“Global culture is not only the latest step in the human evolutionary journey. It is also, as Ivo Quartiroli shows in The Digitally Divided Self, a critical opportunity to apply non-Western techniques of awareness to ensure healthy survival in the 21st century.” —Michael Heim, author of The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality, Virtual Realism, and Electric Language.

“Question the merits of technology in the past and you’d be called a Luddite. But now technologists are leading the way toward a new, more balanced view of our gadget-driven lives. Drawing from his fascinating expertise in computer science and spirituality, Ivo Quartiroli presents a compelling critique of the corrosive impact of the Net on our humanity. It’s a warning we must heed.” —Maggie Jackson, author of Distracted: The Erosion of Attention and the Coming Dark Age.

“A profoundly premonitory vision of the future of the 21st century, The Digitally Divided Self unlocks the great codes of technological society, namely that the very same digital forces that effectively control the shape and direction of the human destiny are also the founding powers of a new revolution of the human spirit.” —Arthur Kroker, author of The Will to Technology and Canada Research Chair in Technology, Culture and Theory.

“People today, especially young people, live more on the Internet than in the real world. This has subtle and not-so-subtle effects on their thinking and personality. It is high time to review these effects, to see whether they are a smooth highway to a bright interconnected future, or possibly a deviation that could endanger health and wellbeing for the individual as well as for society. Ivo Quartiroli undertakes to produce this review and does so with deep understanding and dedicated humanism. His book should be read by everyone, whether he or she is addicted to the Internet or has second thoughts about it.” —Ervin Laszlo, President, the Club of Budapest, and Chancellor, the Giordano Bruno Globalshift University.

“The Mind-Body Split is a pervasive condition/affliction in the developed world, wholly un-recognized; yet fundamental to the great worldwide problems of health, environment, and economic inequity. Ivo Quartiroli’s Digitally Divided Self masterfully examines the effects of the insulated digital experience on the mind and the body self: exacerbating illusions and the Mind-Body Split; and contrasts it to the processes of self-discovery, growth, and healing: true inter-connectedness with nature, each other, and our selves. If the digital age is to solve our real problems, rather than create them, it will be with the knowledge contained in The Digitally Divided Self. Well done!” —Frederic Lowen, son of Alexander Lowen, Executive Director, The Alexander Lowen Foundation

“Ivo Quartiroli here addresses one of the most pressing questions forced upon us by our latest technologies. In disturbing the deepest relations between the user’s faculties and the surrounding world, our electric media, all of them without exception, create profound disorientation and subsequent discord, personal and cultural. Few subjects today demand greater scrutiny.” — Dr. Eric McLuhan, Author and Lecturer

“The internet is an extension of our central nervous system. When you operate a computer, you are extending yourself, through its interface, potentially all over the world, instantaneously. Extending yourself in such a disembodied, discarnate fashion only further entrenches your separateness, your ego self. In contrast, the introspective freeing from the physical through meditation also has the effect of creating a discarnate, disembodied state. That state is one that is progressively less identified with the ego self. This is the dichotomy that Ivo Quartiroli explores in The Digitally Divided Self. This book is well worth investigating.” —Michael McLuhan

“We should all be asking the questions Ivo Quartiroli asks in this bold and provocative book. Whatever you think right now about technology, The Digitally Divided Self will challenge you to think again.” —William Powers, author of the New York Times bestseller Hamlet’s BlackBerry

“It isn’t easy to find an informed and critical look at the impact of digital media practices on human lives and minds. Ivo Quartiroli offers an informed critique based in both an understanding of technology and of human consciousness.” —Howard Rheingold, author of The Virtual Community and Smart Mobs.

“Ivo Quartiroli is mining the rich liminal territory between humans and their networks. With the integrity of a scientist and the passion of artist, he forces us to reconsider where we end and technology begins. Or when.” —Douglas Rushkoff, Media Theorist and author of Cyberia, Media Virus, Life, Inc. and Program or Be Programmed.

“You might find what he writes to be challenging, irritating, even blasphemous and sacrilegious. If so, he has proven his point. The Internet, Ivo suggests, might just be the new opium of the masses. Agree with him or not, no other book to date brings together the multitude of issues related to how the seductions of technology impinge upon and affect the development of the self and soul.” —Michael Wesch, Associate Professor of Digital Ethnography, Kansas State University

“The Digitally Divided Self is a refreshing look at technology that goes beyond the standard, well-worn critiques. Ivo Quartiroli charts new territory with a series of profound reflections on the intersections of computer science, psychology and spirituality.” —Micah White, Senior Editor at Adbusters magazine.

Detailed table of contents, introduction and chapter 1.

Order on Amazon.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: From Awareness of technology to technologies of Awareness .. 1
Chapter 2:“It’s only a tool” .. 17
Chapter 3: The Roots of It .. 39
Chapter 4: The Digitization of Reality .. 53
Chapter 5: Intimacy and Sexuality.. 73
Chapter 6: Commoditizing and Monetizing.. 89
Chapter 7: Politics, Participation and Control .. 97
Chapter 8: Come together: the Rise of Social networks.. 115
Chapter 9: Digital Kids ..125
Chapter 10: Literacy and the Analytical Mind.. 133
Chapter 11: Lost in the Current .. 143
Chapter 12: The Digitally Divided Self.. 165
Chapter 13: The Process of Knowledge .. 189
Chapter 14: Upgrading to Heaven .. 205
Chapter 15: Biting the Snake.. 223
Appendix: The People of Contemporary It and what Drives them.. 233

Introduction

Like many people nowadays, much of my personal and professional life is related to technology: I use the Internet for keeping the connection with my work projects and friends wherever I am in the world. I published the first book in Italy about the Internet. I run a blog and a Web magazine, do my investments online, shop on the Net, do interviews by email and Skype, and have even indulged in cybersex. Right now I’m in Asia developing this book – which is full of references to Web articles, blogs and material found only on the Internet – with online support: an editor and writing coach in California, copy editor in India, book designer in Italy, and a printing and distribution service with multiple locations in USA. My life is immersed in the digital loop.

I have been involved in IT since I was a student. As I learned meditation and explored spiritual paths, I developed an inner observer and discovered states beyond the mind. Thus, I found myself going back and forth between processing consciousness and information. Slowly my focus has shifted from what we can do with technology to what technology does to us. As a first-hand explorer, I’ve observed the subtle changes of our massive use of the Net.

Just as a spiritual researcher can go beyond the mind only after having observed and mastered it, it is necessary to enter the digital world to step beyond it. We can’t become aware of its effects without being engaged in it. Since digital technology is unavoidable now, we need to master it without becoming lost in it, using its tools with our full awareness.

In this time, the intensification of mental inputs is a phenomenon that must be kept in balance. Our contemporary culture does not acknowledge anything beyond the mind, but in other traditions the mental world is just one of the aspects of our wholeness. In the West a sort of Cartesian “pure thinking” has been given priority. Although the mind is the best-known organ of thought, it is not the only cognitive modality. Nervous systems have been discovered both in the heart and in the belly, and the global awareness that can be accessed by spiritual practitioners is pervasive and non-localized. Yet these modalities cannot be represented digitally, so they are relegated to the sidelines.

Our technological society militates against uninterrupted conscious attention. Several authors have documented the effects of IT on attention, literacy and intellectual skills. It also intrudes on the silent time needed to be aware of inner transformations. We don’t realize we have become servomechanisms of IT – precisely because IT has weakened the inner skills of self-understanding. Shrinking of the rich range of human qualities to privilege only those which can be represented and operated digitally arises from the nature of the ego-mind and our particular Western history which has engendered – then valued – mental representations of reality. My focus here is to understand why the mind can be lured by the magic of the tools, while forgetting the person who is using them.

We believe we are empowered individually and politically as we post articles on our blogs and participate in social networks. In actuality, we feed the machine with our “user-generated content” which becomes candy for advertisers who then design ads based on what we say on Twitter, Facebook, and even our emails.

Jumping from information to self-understanding is necessary if we are to regain real freedom, a freedom from conditioning of our mind and the manipulation by information – whether self-created or from external sources. We mistake the transmission of gigabytes of data for freedom.

In our advanced technological society there is a reticence to acknowledge the inner, spiritual or metaphysical dimensions of life. What cannot be calculated – which is, thereby, “not objective” – is considered unworthy of investigation. Even more strongly denied is the relationship between technology and the impact on our psyche. Technophiles declare that it’s only a tool, as if our psyche could remain untouched by continuous interaction with digital media, and as if we could control its impact on us. We can indeed be in control of digital media – but only after we become fluent in those cognitive modalities which can’t be reached by such media.

To be unaffected by digital media, we need a Buddha-like awareness with sustained attention, mindfulness and introspection. Yet these very qualities which are needed to break out of the automated mind are especially difficult to access when we are drowning in information – information that is predominantly ephemeral and transient, and which lacks a broader narrative. Awareness is what gives meaning and depth to information, but for awareness to expand we need to empty our mind. A story will illustrate this. A university professor approached a master to learn about Zen. Tea was served, but when the cup was full, the master did not stop pouring. The cup, like the professor’s mind with its concepts and positions, was full. It must first be emptied to understand Zen. So, too, for the digital world.

The world over, people using the Internet click on the same icons, use the same shortcuts in email and chats, connect with people through the same Facebook modalities. This is the globalization of minds. In the process of the digitization of reality, regardless of content, we use predominantly the same limited mental channels and interact with the same tools. We bring the same attitudes, gestures and procedures to working, dating, shopping, communicating with friends, sexual arousal, and scientific research. And most of these activities are impoverished by this phenomenon. Everything is seen as an information system, from the digitization of territory (like Google Earth and augmented realities software) to our biology.

Judeo-Christian culture places nature and the world of matter at man’s disposal. Acting on them is a way to garner good deeds and regain the lost perfection of Eden. In this culture that has considered miracles as proof of the existence of God, we have developed technologies that resemble the miraculous and the divine. We are compelled to welcome the advent of new technological tools with the rhetoric of peace, progress, prosperity and mutual understanding.

The telegraph, telephone, radio, TV and other media have been regarded as tools for democracy, world peace, understanding and freedom of expression. The Internet is just the latest in a succession of promising messiahs. Yet we don’t have more democracy in the world. In fact, big media and big powers are even stronger, while freedom of expression has ceded to control by corporations and governmental agencies. The Internet, like TV, will be entertaining, dumbing people in their own separate homes where they will be unable to question the system. The Internet might already be the new soma for a society experiencing economic and environmental degradation. But with the huge economic interests connected to it, criticizing its effect is akin to cursing God.

Many technological developments appeal to people because they answer psychological and even spiritual needs – like the quests for understanding and connection with others. Already digital technology has taken charge of truth and love – the drives which are distinctly human. Those primordial needs have been addressed, on the mental level, with information. Reflected only at that level, our soul is left empty with craving for the real qualities, and our mind is left restless, craving more information and chasing after satisfaction in vain.

The need to extend our possibilities through technology derives from the need to recover parts of ourself that were lost during the development of our soul – the states of sharp perception, fulfillment, and peace. Information technology (IT) also satisfies our ancient drives for power and control, even giving us several options with a simple click or touch of a finger.

The endless multiplication of information can keep the ego-mind busy – and thus at the center of the show. IT is the most powerful mental “pusher” ever created, feeding the duality of the ego-mind (which is symbolically mirrored by binary technology). More than TV whose attractions are framed between the beginning and ending time of a show, the Internet, video games, and smartphones have no structural pauses or endings. Hooked on a “real-time” stream of information, they take us farther away from both the real and the appropriate time frames.

The computer charms us by reflecting our mind on the Net. Like Narcissus, we mistake the reflected image and enter a closed loop, charmed by our reflection. The Internet, since the beginning, has been considered a technology which could crumble central governments and organizations. Perhaps that forecast was an external projection of what can happen inside us: disturbance of the integration of our psyches.

Meditation helps us recognize that we construct reality and that the mind leads us astray. Meditation is a path back to reality, to truth, to knowing and mastering our minds – instead of mastering the computer as a way to outsource our mind’s skills. It is a way to expand our awareness and join the other global “Net” – of awareness that permeates everything.

Though I am Italian, I am publishing this book for the English market because it is a post-digital book which can be better appreciated in countries where digital culture has spread throughout society. In Italy, one politically powerful tycoon owns most of the media, and uses it to demonize the Net. In that setting, being critical of the Net invokes the accusation of aligning with power to castrate freedom of expression, which is the polar opposite of my intention.

I welcome every medium which expands our chances of expressing ourselves, but I am aware that true self-expression can happen only when there’s a true self, which can hardly be shaped by screen media.

I am grateful to my spiritual teachers who opened new dimensions for my soul in my journey toward awareness, especially the intensity of Osho and the brilliant clarity of A. H. Almaas. I thank my copy editor Dhiren Bahl (www.WordsWay-Copyediting.com) for his painstaking corrections of my English text and my editor David Carr (www.MovingWords.us) for his clarifications and stylistic improvements. I’m grateful to my friends, too many to list here, for the numerous talks bringing together heart and mind in sharing our passion for truth.

Detailed table of contents, introduction and chapter 1.

Order on Amazon.

The Digitally Divided Self. Table of Contents, Introduction and Chapter 1

Ivo Quartiroli — Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:40:15 +0000

Order on Amazon.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: From Awareness of technology to technologies of Awareness .. 1
The Limits of Technology.. 3
What’s Not Computable Isn’t Real .. 4
The Promises of the Early Internet .. 5
From Information Processing to Consciousness Processing.. 6
All in the Digital Mincer .. 7
Technology Can’t be Challenged.. 8
Technology Uses Us .. 10
Feeding the Soul with Bytes .. 11
The Immortal Mind .. 12
Inner Prostheses and Amputations through Technology .. 13
Beyond the Mind.. 14
The Fragility of Beliefs and Information Technology.. 15

Chapter 2:“It’s only a tool” .. 17
Technology is not Questionable .. 18
Knowing through the Body .. 18
Technology “Does” Us .. 19
Technology is a Matter of Life and Death.. 21
Binary and Inner Duality.. 21
Knowing through the Heart.. 22
Our Identity With Tools – from Chimps to Chips .. 25
Reconnecting with the Inner Flow.. 26
From Spectator to Witness .. 28
Inner Holes and Techno-Fills .. 28
Pure Thinking Without the Body.. 30
Tools for Inner Growth.. 31
The Mind Itself is a Medium.. 34
IT Weakens Our Presence .. 36
Constrained to Produce .. 39

Chapter 3: The Roots of It .. 39
Constrained to Produce .. 39
IT was Started by the Bible .. 40
Technology as Returning to the Lost Perfection .. 41
Contradictory Messages Short Circuit the Psyche .. 43
Children of a Lesser God .. 44
Psychological Defenses .. 44
Technology as the Ultimate Savior .. 45
The Nature of the Mind.. 46
Conceptual Debris and Technology as a Holding Agent for the Psyche 47
The Quest for Immortality .. 48
Copying, Improving and Creating Minds.. 50

Chapter 4: The Digitization of Reality .. 53
Data is King .. 55
The Digitization of Territory .. 56
Augmenting Reality .. 57
The Mind as the First Virtual Reality Tool .. 58
The Digitization of Biology .. 59
Analogical Models of Reality .. 64
Our Digital Nervous Systems .. 66
Programming .. 67
Thinking like Software .. 69
Digitizing All Life Events .. 71

Chapter 5: Intimacy and Sexuality.. 73
Eros and the Sexualization of Society .. 74
Cybersex.. 75
The Transformation of Seduction and of Relationship .. 77
Masturbation and Sex Toys.. 78
Orgasm 2.0.. 80
Cybervirgins .. 82
Gender Issues and the Vanishing Male.. 84
Earlier Exposure to Porn.. 85
Desires .. 87
Cybersex as a Tantric Path .. 87

Chapter 6: Commoditizing and Monetizing.. 89
Replacing the Real .. 90
Playing with Feelings .. 90
iMarket .. 92
Brave New World.. 94
Deconstructing Sense and Ethics.. 94
Toward the Denial of Truth .. 95

Chapter 7: Politics, Participation and Control .. 97
The Rulers of Our Psyches .. 98
Governments.. 99
Advertising and Our Attention.. 100
Google .. 101
Wikileaks .. 104
Into Our Digital Persona .. 104
You Can Tell What Somebody is Like by the Company They Keep.. 105
Is the Internet Empowering Us? .. 106
Illusory Participation.. 107
Slacktivism .. 110
The Yogic Geek.. 112
Renouncing the World .. 115

Chapter 8: Come together: the Rise of Social networks.. 115
Renoucing the World .. 115
The Inner Need of Connection and Facebook.. 116
Experiencing for Others to See .. 118
Empathy.. 119
Illusory Contact.. 121
Body/Mind Development in Childhood .. 125

Chapter 9: Digital Kids ..125
Body/Mind Development in Childhood .. 125
Denied Childhood .. 126
Computers in Education .. 127
Lack of Mentors .. 128
Technology as an Answer to Social Fear .. 129
Wired Children.. 130
Sleepless Children .. 132

Chapter 10: Literacy and the Analytical Mind.. 133
Analytical and Critical Skills .. 136
A New Literacy Through eBooks? .. 138
The Reading “Technology” .. 139
Digital Writing .. 140
Communication and the Transformation of Consciousness.. 141
Attend to This! .. 143

Chapter 11: Lost in the Current .. 143
Attend to This! .. 143
Attend to it Now and Forever! .. 145
New is Cool .. 145
Instant Gratification.. 145
Neurological Changes Related to Instant Gratification .. 146
Accepting Emptiness and the Eureka Effect.. 147
Faster and Faster, but just Apparently .. 149
Into the Loop .. 151
Technological Updates and the Right to Silence .. 152
Cogitus Interruptus through Multitasking .. 153
No History, No Narrative, No Past .. 156
Digital and Human Memory.. 157
Addiction.. 158
Awareness of Feelings and Addiction.. 162
Attention .. 165

Chapter 12: The Digitally Divided Self.. 165
Attention .. 165
The Construction of the Self .. 166
Technological Development as a Metaphor of the Psychological One .. 170
Millions of MP3s and the Missing “My Personality” .. 173
Attachment to the Machine .. 173
The Need for Mirroring .. 174
Maternal Feeding and Paternal Limit Setting .. 175
The Sand Castle Crumbles: Toward a Schizoid State.. 176
The Other as Image .. 178
Detaching from the Body .. 179
The Schizoid State is an Ontological Condition .. 181
The Eye, the Ear, and a Global Tribalism.. 181
The Mind as a Medium.. 183
No Identity.. 185
The Reign of Objectivity .. 189

Chapter 13: The Process of Knowledge .. 189
The Reign of Objectivity .. 189
Joining Inner and Outer Knowledge .. 192
Not Knowing.. 195
Words are Second-Best After Silence.. 198
Do We Know with our Brains? .. 200
Externalizing Thinking .. 202

Chapter 14: Upgrading to Heaven .. 205
Creating Consciousness.. 206
Technology as an Ego Maintainer .. 209
IT Beyond Me: Unlinking Ourselves through Technology .. 211
Here and Now.. 213
Devotionally Disappearing into Technology.. 214
The Immortal Mind.. 215
Spiritual Powers through Technology .. 217
Are we Machines? .. 218
The Will to Create Mental Worlds .. 220

Chapter 15: Biting the Snake.. 223
Out of the Loop.. 224
Screen Media vs. Meditation .. 225
Meditation .. 228
IT is basically Counter-Meditative.. 230
Another Maya Layer through Technology .. 231
Charles Babbage.. 233

Appendix: The People of Contemporary It and what Drives them.. 233
Charles Babbage.. 233
Ada Lovelace .. 234
John von Neumann.. 234
Norbert Wiener .. 235
Alan Turing .. 235
Al Gore.. 236
Steward Brand .. 237
Kevin Kelly .. 238
Bill Gates.. 239
Steve Jobs .. 239
Withdrawing into the Mind .. 240
Bibliography .. 241
Index .. 249

Order on Amazon.

Introduction

Order on Amazon.

Chapter 1: From Awareness of Technology to Technologies of Awareness

Ever since I was a child the mysteries of numbers fascinated me. When I learned about prime numbers at school, I was captivated by those unique, solitary, unpredictable, indivisible odd numbers.

At 12, I desired nothing less than finding their law. A few years later I discovered long series of numbers which were possibly connected to prime numbers. I found the formulas of the first series, but the more complicated ones had many components in individual numbers reaching fifteen digits. Such numbers were beyond the capacity of pocket calculators, so I proceeded manually.

The slow pace of manual calculation allowed me to “feel” numbers, contemplating each one, sensing its relationship to other numbers in the series. At 15, I entered the Philips Contest for Young Researchers and Inventors. There were just a couple of months to prepare my presentation – impossible for me to progress through all the calculations. Yet under the puzzled gaze of my schoolmates, this wild boy turned into a would-be mathematician.

The computational effort took me to the university’s computer center to ask for help. Grounded in comic books, I thought I could “feed” the computer with the numbers in the series and have the formulas delivered. At that time, computer laboratories in Italy looked like any other academic laboratories, with high-level technicians dressed formally. I tried to explain my problem to a few students, who mostly ignored me. A kind employee told me simply that computers couldn’t find the formulas of my series – they could not even add or subtract such big numbers unless they were programmed to. “Oh really? Are computers that dumb?” I wondered.

I understood from her that what I needed was a piece of “software” suited to the problem. “Fine,” I said, “can you make it for me?” She couldn’t, since it had to be designed for the specific problem – and anyway, computer time was very limited, even for students. I returned to manual calculations.

In 1976 computers were as big and unapproachable as the people who worked with them. In time, computers became more user-friendly and much faster – but not less dumb. Concurrently, computer technicians changed from uniforms to casual or messy clothes, though their detached attitude did not noticeably change.

For my research on those series, I was a finalist in the Italian contest – which led to a personal conversation with the president of the Italian CNR (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, National Research Council). He discouraged me from searching for the law of prime numbers as “a waste of time, something which centuries of mathematicians had already tried to find, but nobody could.” I might instead concentrate my energies on developing useful applications in the scientific arena. He introduced me to the reality that research was most welcomed by society when it could be translated into products and money.

What about the fun and enthusiasm I had doing that research? What about the almost mystical states I reached in diving into the mysteries of prime numbers? What about the development of my perseverance in pursuing such a task, even though (or maybe because) it was an impossible one? What about my capacity to tolerate frustration when my long calculations had been faulty from the beginning of the series?

I recognize now that some important inner qualities had been shaped as I chased those prime numbers. I had learned that the path is itself the goal.

Latin putare means “to prune,” “to cut,” “to clean.” In the etymology of “computer” lies its implicit goal: something to accomplish, to complete, a clear-cut result to reach.

Computing, that increasingly-present activity in our lives, has created what I call the “digitization of reality.” Computing wants answers – well-defined results cleansed of “noise” – and it wants them fast.

Descartes, in his Discourse on the Method which shaped Western science, sought a state of pure thinking, free from the body and from feelings – for in his opinion they would distort the scientific quest. He would be proud of contemporary technical developments which allow both scientists and ordinary people to interact with a machine through pure thinking. But if he could peek into this century, I feel he would miss the philosophical and spiritual attitude he had even as a scientist – which is left out of the technological race.

In our rush, everything which can possibly be automated and speeded up becomes digital. Everything which can be represented by bits and bytes is sucked into the digitizing mentality.

I too believed this, when it was time for university, so I went into computer science – partly to fulfill my need to write a program to find the law of my series. In time I stopped chasing prime numbers, but by then I was a programming enthusiast.

What did not change was my propensity for impossible tasks. Since I enjoyed playing the guitar, I wrote a program for creating chords and harmonies. Then, wanting to grab the secrets of guitarists like Jimi Hendrix or Carlos Santana, I translated their improvisations into digital form. After all, I figured, musical scales have a mathematical structure, so if I could decode and deconstruct their creations, then my software could produce amazing new melodies which I could then reproduce on my guitar.

There was still no affordable way to generate good quality sound from a computer, so as output (programming in C language for the UNIX operating system), I had a list of notes, their pitch, duration, and their attributes like sliding or bending – a sort of score I could perform on my guitar. Far from masterpieces, they were funny, like the caricature of a living person.

Meanwhile, I was working for the computer labs of the new computer science faculty in Milan, preferring to learn through practice rather than study for exams. There was a pioneering atmosphere in the very early 1980s – and many of the students later becoming entrepreneurs of the dotcom revolution in Italy.

The peak of impossibility lay in my plan to create an artificial intelligence system, written in the Prolog programming language, to explore people’s psychological patterns in depth – according to various models, both psychological and spiritual. It never went beyond a very initial idea.

The Limits of Technology

In searching for the law of prime numbers, for the secrets of great guitarists’ solos, or for the understanding of the human soul, 25 years ago, I reached what was – and still remains – the limits of computability.

Finding those limits is perhaps the unconscious secret goal of our drive toward technology. Whatever can be made digital is merely a model created by the mind, which the mind itself can reshape or destroy at any moment.

The mind is by nature dualistic, operating within the same binary logic as computers. The dualistic-binary attitude of looking at the world gives both people and computers a powerful discriminating tool – a tool to produce huge amount of data and to act on matter in powerful ways. Through this dualistic mind we can fulfill our highest “mission” – to be masters of nature, as assigned by the scriptures. But matters that are more than mental – artistic creativity, brilliant intuition, feelings of compassion, love, joy, peace, as well as experiencing spiritual states like a no-mind state of deep meditation – cannot be represented in digital form. Though information technology can point to or inform us about those states, more often than not it keeps us stuck looping at the informational level, actually distancing us from them.

As we reach the limits of technology, either it can stimulate our search for something further – jumping from information to consciousness-processing as Peter Russell (1995) defined it – or we can become hypnotized by the infinite forms information can be shaped into. Like a fascinating psychedelic vision, the digital realm can amaze us forever, but basically it goes no further than the mental level which originally created the technology.

My impossible tasks, seen in retrospect, were my self-inflicted koans. A koan is a question with no apparent answer given by a Zen master to a student. The very effort to find an answer is what transforms consciousness and eventually stops the mind. Staying in the unknown is not comfortable for the mind, but it is the best way to link the subject of the quest with our inner void. From this, greater awareness can arise. By contrast, much of the Web industry is designed to cut through, to deliver answers quickly – not in itself a bad thing, but which can and does weaken the drive of our inner quest.

Since the impossible tasks didn’t pay, I worked on more practical software and wrote about computer science. In 1982, with the UNIX internal architecture still a well-kept secret and without much documentation for the end user, two other students and I wrote a book about UNIX. We printed it with a low-quality dot matrix printer, and I felt like a technical Che Guevara fighting for the liberation of computer knowledge.

What’s Not Computable Isn’t Real

Writing for computer science magazines in the mid ’80s, I alternated technical articles with interviews of philosophers and psychologists about the inner and social implications of the computer revolution, including a column called “Loops” for Informatica Oggi magazine, the leading computer Italian science magazine at the time. My heretical column was scrapped by the publisher after only a few months because some readers complained that those subjects had nothing to do with computer science, and that they’d rather read “real” and “useful” information.

Turning the view 180 degrees toward the inner side, from what we can do with technology to what technology does to us wasn’t a very popular move. Anything that smells of the philosophical, the inner, or the metaphysical is still seen with suspicion by people into technology, who categorize those perspectives as “things which could even be interesting, but vague and non-scientific.” For the most part, challenging technology has become almost taboo in our culture. As Neil Postman (1993) contended: “‘The computer shows…’ or ‘The computer has determined…’ is Technopoly’s equivalent of the sentence, ‘It is God’s will’ and the effect is roughly the same.”

Technology seems “inevitable.” It is rarely considered that people who are sensitive to what technology does to us might embrace and use technology – though they do it from 360 degrees instead of looking just at the bright front side.

In advanced technological societies there is a reticence to acknowledge the inner, the spiritual, or the metaphysical dimensions of life. The inner is seen pertinent only to religion, reinforcing the historical division of powers which gave science dominion over matter and religion dominion over the soul. What is non-calculable or non-objective is mostly ignored, as are the implications of technology for our psyche.

Sensitivity to the inner is easily branded new-ageism, fundamentalism, or plain weirdness. Meditation is misunderstood as thinking. The body-mind connection is something to decode by DNA sequences. Going beyond the mind is misunderstood as going below the functionality of mind, dulled rather than perceiving more deeply. Understanding is something which we infer only intellectually. The inner void is something we become aware of only when the computer hangs and we are left to stare blankly at the screen. Mind is seen mainly in terms of cognitive capacities and performance, a set of neurotransmitters which can eventually be “fixed” or “enhanced” by pharmacological molecules.

The Promises of the Early Internet

After publishing my own books, I became a publisher of computer science books. Around 1994, when the Internet was becoming popular in Italy, I welcomed the Net in enthusiastic terms. Like many early enthusiasts, I saw the Net as a way to produce and share information in a more democratic way that could threaten big powers and even nation-states, and having the potential of shaping global consciousness.

Through Apogeo, my former publishing house, I published the first books in Italy about the Internet, convincing the traditional media that the Net wasn’t just about terrorists, pedophiles and dangerous hackers. For many years there was an opposition between the Internet on one side, and TV and print media on the other. Hostility toward the Internet was about competing interests, as well as simple ignorance. Their distorted, inaccurate and false vision of the Internet continues to this day.

At the same time, it was difficult to find a balanced, critical view of the role of the Net in society and in people’s minds. Anybody who criticized the Net risked being branded a close-minded conservative, a Luddite, an “old media” supporter wanting to limit the freedom of expression which the Net seemed to expand.

The fact is, though, that after twenty years of the Internet in our lives, most of the promises have not been fulfilled. We don’t have more democracy in the world, big media and big powers are even stronger, no global consciousness has arisen – and even though everybody can upload anything onto the Web simply and cheaply, we know less about what is happening in Iraq and Afghanistan than what we knew about the Vietnam war which was heavily broadcast. Yes, there are sites through which information can leak, but the leakage is a drop in the ocean of information daily available – and on sites read by a small percentage of web users.

Even when alternative information is presented, it is likely to be found on less popular websites that are far down in Google’s ranking. This merely deludes us into believing we have a tool for spreading information to the world – when in most cases it is more like a neighborly backyard chat. A chat, in fact, that can be traced and controlled. The big media have not disappeared – and their presence on the Net could make them even bigger.

Furthermore, privacy and control issues by governments and companies like Google and Facebook are, to say the least, worrying. What was once a place with no commercial interests is now full of advertisements, with some free services likely to become fee-based.

As soon as my company could afford it, I published a series on media studies, spirituality and Eastern culture, which reflected my personal life-path as a researcher of the truth. I switched from “updating” myself on the latest technical trends to attending workshops in different spiritual traditions and techniques. I went to ashrams in India and studied in psycho-spiritual schools in the US.

From Information Processing to Consciousness Processing

I moved back and forth between information processing and consciousness processing – from the awareness of technology to technologies of awareness. Information and my mind fed each other in a vicious cycle, making it difficult to stop and turn my gaze back toward inner silence. The mechanism of information incites us to stay within the feedback loop.

My subjective inner exploration was important not only for knowing my inner self, but also for clarity and a broader understanding of the outer world. Freeing my mind from conditioning and acquired beliefs proved effective both in my daily life and for a deeper understanding of reality. (Despite common misconceptions, spiritual paths are paths toward reality and clarity.) Beyond the conditioned mind we can see reality in a sharper way.

As every meditator quickly learns, many of our choices only seem to be “ours.” They are, in most cases, the result of early-life messages – either explicit or unconscious –which structured our minds. Those knots can never be untied if we don’t work on them with our attention and full presence.

Uninterrupted conscious attention along with silent time to look into our inner world are exactly what is rendered arduous by the technological society which, to use a term dear to Mauro Magatti (2009), sequesters our attention. The modality of the Internet, regardless of the actual content we are giving attention to, tends to split our attention – among websites, instant messaging, email, social networks, pictures, videos, software tools and more. With the growing speed of computers and the Net, everyone can keep several windows and websites open at once, jumping rapidly from one to the other.

Links themselves – the cement of the Internet – useful as they are, can be distracting. We approach even the best, most interesting and in-depth information with the same divided inner modality. Marshall McLuhan’s awakening phrase “the medium is the message” is true also for the Net. Being more than just another medium, the Net can be considered the summation of all media, and its impact on our inner and outer lives is accordingly stronger than any preceding media.

But we can always be masters of our attention, right? True, but the efforts to direct our attention and maintain it becomes harder with the growing presence of the Internet in our lives.

All in the Digital Mincer

The digitization of reality started with number crunching, a process close to computer language. Computers were initially used for scientific and engineering calculations, later extending to reading, writing, studying, working, entertainment, travel planning, connecting with friends and family, dating, sexual arousal, shopping and banking. And these activities are happening only online for a growing number of people. The “Internet of things” promises to go even further, radio tagging any object on earth with an Internet address, sucking all matter into the Net like a vacuum cleaner. The Net’s voracity doesn’t stop anywhere – including Body Area Networks that will be monitoring people’s physiological parameters.

The Net continually adds to the list of human activities which can be represented digitally – charming us with amazing applications, digitizing traditional needs and desires, and stimulating new ones. The transformation of desires into needs is one of the main activities of technological society, which in this regard shares the attitude with capitalistic society.

But we can just go offline, right? Again, true – but the Internet tends, like a gas, to expand in time and space. It follows us anywhere, through wireless connections and smartphones. With the immediacy of communication through the Net, there is a reciprocal pressure for answers to be fast. If we stay away from the Net for only a couple of days, we could miss an important job message, our friends’ updates, a notification from our airline, a juicy invitation from a person we’re attracted to, a nasty comment on our blog or social network page which we need to remove, a credit card transaction, the choices in door handles from our architect, library and credit card late notices, or a message from the insurance company.

With most of our colleagues, friends and family online, being offline will feel like living in a remote corner of the planet. Therefore, we are more than willing to transfer our lives to the Net, display them on social networks like Facebook, preserve our private documents in the “cloud,” and embrace technologies which promise to amaze and empower us. We can happily disembody into the cloud like a “pure” angel.

Technology Can’t be Challenged

When I started, computers were in transition from mainframes to PCs –a milestone in the empowerment of the individual, who could finally manage his own data, in his own time and place, and on his own computer. Floppy disks may have had very limited capacity, but we welcomed this freedom. Today PCs are more powerful than those mainframes, but we willingly give our data and computations back to Web services in the cloud.

Since the advent of computers, there has been concern about how they affect our minds. As computers spread, Sherry Turkle pointed out how they influence construction of the personal self, and Joseph Weizenbaum explored the attitudes of people working with computers. In reality, however, there are not as many people interested in those subjects as there are people chasing after the latest technological gadgets.

There are on the Net itself articles critical of the information society. Some correctly emphasize the loss of concentration through multiple mental stimuli. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr (2008) created a wave of debates. Other commentators have written about the prominence which the Net gives to the latest news, and how small chunks of information force historical context and broader implications into the shadows.

Some people express concern about Internet addiction to online auctions like eBay, to porn and cybersex, and online gaming and chats. Parents and teachers are legitimately concerned about protecting minors from information inappropriate for their age, from cyberpredators to cyberbullying.

Even though critical voices are present, it is not easy to criticize technology. In 2009, neuroscientist Susan Greenfield spoke before the House of Lords about the risk of changes in children’s brains from overuse of social networks. Bloggers and websites counterattacked with the allegation that she had no scientific proof for her “conjecture and opinions.”

This looks like a reverse inquisition. As the Church would condemn anything which wasn’t compatible with Holy Scripture, now it looks like nothing has value if it is not backed by hard scientific proof and plenty of data. With that premise, there can be no value in any inner, philosophical, or ethical quest. What’s not calculable, statistically coherent or scientifically demonstrable is categorized as mere “opinion” and far from truth. Welcome to Technopoly, as Neil Postman defined it.

Saying that “it is not scientific” or “we don’t have enough data” are typical defenses that technologically-oriented people use to counteract criticism or expressions of concern. They also take the position that the answer to any problem arising from technology lies in technology itself: more options, more speed, improved functionalities, a newer version.

We know the common slogans. “Technology and tools in themselves are neutral – it’s about how you choose to use them.” Any tool, however, has wider reverberations in both the social and inner worlds, aside from the way we use it. The mere presence of cars, for instance, reshaped the landscape and changed our connection with it, relocated people, changed the air we breathe, made people more sedentary, revised geopolitical relationships, and built a huge economy based on the powering, production and maintenance of cars and roads. Being without a car is possible but hard to manage, especially in places where public transportation is not in much demand. Yes we have choices in how we use cars: we can kill people with them or transport food to a poor community, but we cannot avoid their effect on our lives. They extend the possibilities of our legs, which grow weak through disuse. And without use, we tend to detach our attention from them. Likewise, TV extends our vision of the world beyond our neighborhood – but the very act of watching isolates us from neighbors and family.

Computers and the Internet are influencing our lives in more and more powerful ways. If cars reshaped the landscape, computers are making it useless. We can do almost anything in front of our screen without going anywhere. And then when we’re outdoors, we can experience the landscape filtered by the “augmented reality” tools of our smartphones. Computers and the Internet have also created a huge economy built on the growing desire for both gadgets and information. They influence our bodies, minds, and inner lives even more pervasively than cars.

Whether we are using the Internet for spreading racial hatred or for organizing support groups for people in trouble, we employ software tools within a certain body-mind setting in front of a screen, and we are communicating with people who share similar settings and tools. Inadvertently, we are feeding the huge Internet economy of software, telecommunication data lines, and hardware – equipment that is mostly produced in countries where labor is cheap and the environmental impact of their production is not debated. Countries that we will likely never visit.

Technology Uses Us

The process of digitization of reality translates our needs into the digital-mental arena, and creates new ones. The fairy tale that we are free to choose how we use technology hides the fact that using technology allows technology to use us. McLuhan said that, “by continuously embracing technologies, we relate ourselves to them as servomechanisms.” We obliterate the awareness of being servomechanisms by believing that technology widens our choices, our freedom, and empowers us. Like car ads that emphasize freedom and power, showing shiny SUVs in mountains or desert – when in reality we spend hours trapped inside them, stuck in traffic.

Always busy clicking here and there, we pay no attention to how our outer and inner states are changed by technology and information. We are numbed to the loss of certain mental capacities and inner qualities which have been walled off by technology that emphasizes only the Now and the Latest, till we no longer remember how we were. This is hardly the here and now inner state described by spiritual teachers like Eckhart Tolle, though that state is being simulated by instant gratification and release from the burden of the past and the future by following the endless stream of new information.

Technologically-oriented people themselves express legitimate concerns. On the social and political levels, many are sensitive to the implications of the digital divide, as well as privacy and the openness of software architectures – yet most of them ignore the deeper implications

Feeding the Soul with Bytes

Traveling from information- to consciousness-processing through meditation and psycho-spiritual understanding, I became aware that many technological developments are appealing because they share deep psychological and even spiritual needs with fake ones. As those primordial needs are translated onto the mental level of information, the emptied soul craves the real qualities, even as the restless mind seeks more information which can never fulfill the authentic needs of the soul. This very restlessness doesn’t allow the subtle inner qualities to penetrate our awareness.

On the psychological level, one of the appeals of the Net is that it fulfills the human need to be seen, listened to, and recognized as we are. Far from being narcissistic, recognition is essential to the development of our personality – and should be acknowledged in childhood by parents, teachers, and other role models. We can only recognize and value our innate qualities initially through the eyes of others.

When parents don’t give enough time and attention to their children (perhaps because of hard work or because they are caught in the technological loop) or when they lack the inner qualities themselves, their children’s need for mirroring is unaddressed. Technology, then, offers a second opportunity to show ourself and relate to others through social networks. What we receive, however, reflects us only on the mental level, which cannot feed our soul with the essential human qualities we need to recognize in ourself and embody.

The spiritual teacher A. H. Almaas (1986) has discriminated many essential human qualities such as Love, Compassion, Joy, Strength, Passion, Steadfastness, Perseverance, Intuition, Curiosity, and Inner Peace. Being seen by Facebook friends is not the same as assimilating the real qualities through connection with a real human being who embodies them. Since we feel an inner lack which can be filled from the outside only in a very temporary and illusory way, we become stuck in needing to be continually recognized. And the mind will try forever.

The use of technology can have direct impact on our neurophysiology as well. Research points to a stunting of the frontal lobe in teenagers who are heavily into computers and video games (Small, 2008). The frontal lobes are fundamental for developing reasoning and judging abilities, and for long-term planning. The instant gratification of computer use can weaken our capacities for broader vision and planning. Poorly-developed frontal lobes are also typical of schizophrenia.

The Immortal Mind

Through technology and the Net we crave divine as well as ordinary powers. So people like Raymond Kurzweil (2005) appeal to us with a future where technological advances will bring us nothing less than immortality – through downloading our mind to the computer. In the history of Western science, he is not the first to apply messianic and religious terms to technology. After all, humanity has already been saved by the technology of Noah’s Ark, so there will surely be a “hack” even for mortality.

What Kurzweil and others are suggesting to drive our evolution through computers and biotechnology is a reflection, confined to the biological and mental levels, of the spiritual quest to elevate awareness beyond our mind. But since the quest is activated through mind-created technology, we can only remain on the same plane as the mind, however expanded and sophisticated it becomes through external supports and enhancements.

Kurzweil claims that “eventually, we leap beyond the boundaries of our planet, and every bit of matter in the entire universe becomes intelligent. . . . This,” he concludes, “is the destiny of the universe.” Sure, but this is already what the universe is, with no need for any contribution of technology. Enlightened spiritual teachers know that the universe is permeated by a brilliant Consciousness which cannot be grasped by ordinary mind, but which can be experienced through advanced states of consciousness as a result of spiritual inquiry.

Since our culture associates human beings mainly with their minds’ contents, then immortality means preserving that information. But if we jump to another level of identification, then the project of preserving our mind is seen as nothing more special than keeping our kidneys functioning by machines in a laboratory. Awareness and the essential human qualities are not a Cartesian matter of a purely mental state. They are a part of the soul which we perceive through our capacity of inner observation. I use the term soul to designate the overall entity of the body-mind, the psyche, and spiritual states. As Almaas says about those essential qualities:

Each of the different ways that Essence appears has recognizable properties and characteristics that differentiate it experientially from the other aspects. Because Essence is not a physical substance, we do not actually perceive its presence with our physical senses, but it can be clearly perceived and recognized through the functioning of subtle inner capacities that correspond to physical senses (2002, p. 250).

Those subtle inner capacities require our awareness of our whole body-mind. We can’t transfer essential qualities to the Net and bring them with us on the techno-immortal journey.

Inner Prostheses and Amputations through Technology

Many technical advances are being made without asking the basic questions about what drives us into technology and what technology really does to us. The time spent talking about technology is concerned with how it works, not with its ends. The implicit belief is that any technological development which seems to expand our options is going to have a positive impact.

McLuhan wrote that “any invention or technology is an extension or self-amputation of our physical bodies, and such extension also demands new ratios or new equilibriums among the other organs and extensions of the body.” We tend to look only at the extended parts, not at the shifting equilibriums they trigger. We prefer to look at our extensions rather than the amputations, because our mind has developed to be more comfortable looking outside than within.

We project externally on technologies, which in turn mirror our self-images. But the amputations hinder recognition. The more we transfer our own qualities to technology, the less we are aware of what’s missing, having weakened the inner tools of self-awareness. We are, like drunks, in denial of our condition.

Translating reality into information is very attractive to the ego-mind. The ego can thus consider the world as a huge information system to be understood, catalogued, and controlled through software – itself an extension of the mind. The mind becomes then a supreme king.

Minds and digital technologies have much in common. Both can simulate almost anything, and both try to incorporate everything into their domains. The mind and the thinking process are the most cherished entities in our culture. But that is not the whole story.

Beyond the Mind

There are states beyond the mind which can be reached through awareness. There exists a condition of “spiritual enlightenment” which can elevate human beings to the divine and to global Consciousness. Spiritual teachers of every age have pointed to such a state, however difficult it is to communicate through words what is beyond mind.

Words, dual in themselves, are the tools at hand to describe the non-dual state of union with the whole, called spiritual enlightenment, satchitananda (the merging of existence, consciousness and bliss), being a Buddha, God Realization, and Ultimate Understanding.” I have a faint echo of this from the glimpses of higher states my own journey has offered.

But the words of spiritual teachers are the map, not the territory – and my experiences could be no more than delusions. Actually, some teachers say that any experience is not yet that, so a Zen master would probably hit my head with a stick. The truth is that neither I nor anyone has a way to prove the existence of such a state, since every “proof” would stay on the level of the mind itself. All in all, it’s a matter of faith. And even science has its own axioms or postulates, truths which are taken for granted.

The word faith has been associated with the monotheistic religions, with fundamentalism and in opposition to an open quest for the truth. Much blood has been spilled in the name of faith. Faith has been used, as well, to mean not acknowledging scientific truths. I am not talking about that faith.

Where my faith comes from is a mystery. Maybe I was touched by reading, maybe I felt an echo of something larger than the mind or I recognized higher states of being in my spiritual teachers.

If I would add anything more than plain faith to the existence of spiritual enlightenment, then trouble would ensue. For instance, when instead of saying “God exists,” we say “God is goodness,” we are already in a dualistic perspective that can easily slip into “Who doesn’t believe in God is evil.” Also, if the postulate that spiritual enlightenment exists were extended into “I know the only way toward enlightenment,” then we would fall into fundamentalism. The mind wants to pull into its purview even what can never be known by it.

Words are products of the conceptual/dual mind, and nobody can avoid the risk of building structures and dogmas when talking about no-mind. But what’s important is to keep an open-ended attitude at the root of any inquiry, whether scientific or self-inquiry.

The Fragility of Beliefs and Information Technology

Science cannot conceive anything beyond the ego and the mind – not even in human sciences such as psychology (with the exception of transpersonal psychology). Thus, abandoning our mind’s contents seems like total defeat. In the West, nihilism is often knocking at the door, since what the mind creates – by its ephemeral nature – the mind itself can destroy. Without acknowledging a spiritual dimension, one is tempted to say that there’s nothing solid – and ultimately that there’s no sense in anything.

A culture which has been developed on the foundation of “I think, therefore I am” will cling to thinking and will produce tools to keep the mind busy all the time. But for the spiritually-oriented person there’s a plan B. The abandonment of the ego-mind is equivalent to the metamorphosis of a caterpillar into a butterfly.

The ephemeral nature of the mind becomes clear when, in meditation, we try with titanic effort to observe our thoughts and sensations, instead of clinging to them as they carry our mind away. We can see then how weak our skills are to concentrate on a single object, how short-lived our thoughts are, and how little control we have over them. The mind has been compared by spiritual teachers to a drunken monkey. Yet we cherish our thinking process as the highest expression of being human.

Technology and information are also quite ephemeral. The chances of preserving their digital contents are dim compared to other media. Papyrus lasted thousands of years, books hundreds of years, CDs (the very best quality) dozens of years, and hard drives only a few years.

The software I wrote when I was at university was backed up on magnetic data tape. I don’t know if there’s any compatible tape reader still tucked away in some laboratory. Even if there were, most probably the tape would have been demagnetized by now. But even if not, the software will have been rewritten to work with current operating systems.

In recovering data which is just a few years old, there are both hardware and software format problems. Converting our data to ever-changing computer formats is a huge job – which most probably will never be done either by individuals or institutions. Even if it were, who could make sense of that huge amount of data?

Technology is fragile in other aspects too. As shown by Low-Tech Magazine, the energy consumption of hi-tech devices is skyrocketing, especially the energy required to manufacture them. “The embodied energy of the memory chip of a computer alone already exceeds the energy consumption of the laptop during its life expectancy of 3 years” (deDecker, 2009). Digital technology then, like many other developments since we started to drill for oil, is a product of cheap energy. With the growing cost of energy and a lurking peak in oil production, we won’t see as many hi-tech devices around as we are used to. Also, many hi-tech products depend on rare earth metals, more than 95 percent of which are found in China – which plans to limit exports.

Hi-tech products are also very sensitive to the electromagnetic radiation of solar wind. The current 11-year solar cycle, which started in 2007 and will peak around 2013, should be significantly stronger than the previous one. Solar flares shoot energetic photons toward Earth, upsetting the geomagnetic field and potentially affecting power grids, communications, satellites, GPS signals and even electronic chips.

A strong solar storm in 1859 shorted telegraph wires, causing fires in North America and Europe. If such an electromagnetic storm occurred today, it would take four to ten years to recover electric power lines, according to a report of the National Academy of Science. Given the strong interdependence of every system, the effects could be devastating for the whole of society.

As with meditation techniques, in which we learn to observe and let go of arising thoughts, maybe we should begin to practice letting go of our attachments to the information loop.

Order on Amazon.

Steve Jobs

Ivo Quartiroli — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:46:02 +0000

Steve Jobs is much in the news recently but only as a commercial or technical phenomenon. His psychological roots (as with anyone) determine his actions in the world. A prime example of the Enneagram’s Type Five personality, Jobs offers an opportunity to understand this structure as it is seen through patterns in his life and behavior.

Steve Jobs, co-founder of Apple with Steve Wozniak, was born in 1955 while his mother was a single college graduate. Unable to support her baby, she put him up for adoption. It mattered to her that his adopting parents were college graduates. However, when the couple she had arranged with learned the baby was a boy, they reneged.

The next couple willing to adopt him did not have degrees. So she continued to nurture him for a few months until the adopting parents committed to seeing him graduate–though, ultimately, he dropped out anyway. As with Ada Lovelace, regarded as the first programmer, someone rejected at birth, grew into an icon in IT.

In line with the counterculture of the 70s, he explored LSD and went to India for a spiritual retreat. (He now identifies himself as a Buddhist.) In 1978, repeating his own history, he fathered a girl who was raised on welfare while he denied paternity on the grounds of being sterile.

Continuing to move with the times, he became one of the most innovative and often controversial entrepreneurs in IT. Apple gave new meaning to personal computing, introducing visual cues and user-friendly interfaces.

In 1998, the Dalai Lama gave permission for Apple to use his image with the words, “Think different.” China at the time was not an attractive market for Apple products. But business is business even for Buddhist ex-hippies. Under Jobs, Apple blocked a number of applications related to the Dalai Lama from the Chinese iPhones. Apple spokeswoman Trudy Muller responded, “We continue to comply with local laws…not all apps are available in every country.” And recently Apple admitted that child labor was used in factories in China that produce their hardware.

However, his life with Apple was not a straight road. In 1985, he was fired by the board of directors. He then founded NeXT computers, later bought by The Graphics Group which turned it into Pixar, the most prolific computer graphics company producing Toy Story, Finding Nemo, and Ratatouille. In 1996, Apple bought NeXT, bringing Jobs back to his original company as CEO.

In 2004, he was diagnosed with a rare, operable form of pancreatic cancer. Five years later a liver transplant allowed him to continue his creative mission.

In many parts of the world, adopted children are considered as “nobody’s children.” Perhaps a scanty identity drove him to India in search of his soul, but then he chose to construct a more acceptable one. Through prestige and money he built a well-defined “I”—iPod, iMac, iPhone, iPad. Through many anecdotes about his management style, we know Jobs as one of biggest egos in the IT world.

A pattern that emerges from the overview of his life is a repeated dropping out and redefining himself. Rejected by mother, potential parents, the very company he started; rejecting his education and his daughter; to nearly being rejected by life through major health problems.

Even making a home has been hard. Legal and bureaucratic problems surrounded a historical mansion he purchased in 1984 in Woodside, California. After living in its almost unfurnished state for years, he planned to demolish it to build a new house, but a local preservation group stopped him. He spent years renovating an apartment on the top floors of a New York City building, but never moved in. He seems in perpetual search for both inner and outer home, bouncing back from every difficulty with new tools and renewed energy to lay before the world.

Withdrawing into the Mind

Steve Job’s story is typical of the Type Five personality in the Enneagram (even thought elements of Type Seven are present too), a pattern shared by many people in the IT world. This psychospiritual system discriminates nine styles of personality. Probably of Sufi origin, it was brought to the West by George Gurdjieff around 1900, then spread in the 1970s as Oscar Ichazo and psychiatrist Claudio Naranjo elaborated the core qualities of the nine types. It was later popularized by Don Riso and Russ Hudson, as well as by Helen Palmer. A.H. Almaas elaborated the spiritual dimension in the 1990s.

Early ontological insecurity about survival can shape a schizoid personality, to which Enneatype Five is the closest. Rationality and orderliness are valuable defense mechanisms against the threat of being separated from life, assembling everything in its own place.

Type Fives escape into their mental world for safe haven. They want to be accepted for their capabilities, often disappearing from the scene to stay with their own minds and develop skills. These give them confidence to re-enter as talented (thus, accepted) persons with innovative ideas to display.

They are most successful by creating a niche which no one else occupies, giving them an acknowledged place in the world. Apple’s technology is proprietary, guaranteeing Jobs his unique place and highlighting the greedy aspect of Five personalities to horde—whether it is keeping their emotions and possessions to themselves or proprietary information.

The schizoid Type Five personality seems more widespread than others in the modern, technology-dependent world. The possible reasons for this are worth contemplating.

Frontal Lobes Development and Technology Use

Ivo Quartiroli — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:23:30 +0000

[en]

Neuroscientist Gary Small, co-author with Gigi Vorga of iBrain: Surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind writes:

Teenagers desire instant gratification – they want to satisfy their needs and do it now, not later. Their underdeveloped frontal lobes often impair their everyday judgment. Many teens feel they are invincible – danger will bounce off them. Today’s obsession with computer technology and video gaming appears to be stunting frontal lobe development in many teenagers, impairing their social and reasoning abilities. If young people continue to mature in this fashion, their brains’ neural pathways may never catch up. It is possible that they could remain locked into a neural circuitry that stays at an immature and self-absorbed emotional level, right through adulthood.

Then he writes that when we act in a way that gratifies our needs instantly, the brain’s emotional centers, the parts of the brain which aren’t able to plan for the future, take over.

What’s the role of the frontal lobes? From Wikipedia:

The frontal lobe reaches full maturity around age 25, marking the cognitive maturity associated with adulthood. Arthur Toga, UCLA, found increased myelin in the frontal lobe white matter of young adults compared to that of teens. A typical onset of schizophrenia in early adult years correlates with poorly myelinated and thus inefficient connections between cells in the fore-brain…The frontal lobe contains most of the dopamine-sensitive neurons in the cerebral cortex. The dopamine system is associated with reward, attention, long-term memory, planning, and drive. Dopamine tends to limit and select sensory information arriving from the thalamus to the fore-brain. A report from the National Institute of Mental Health says a gene variant that reduces dopamine activity in the prefrontal cortex is related to poorer performance and inefficient functioning of that brain region during working memory tasks, and to slightly increased risk for schizophrenia…The executive functions of the frontal lobes involve the ability to recognize future consequences resulting from current actions, to choose between good and bad actions (or better and best), override and suppress unacceptable social responses, and determine similarities and differences between things or events. Therefore, it is involved in higher mental functions.

If there’s a time in history where a long-term vision is needed, it’s now. Both in the environmental and financial areas we are going to pay the cost heavily for a short-term view. Environmentally, we exploited the planet’s resources as if they were infinite with a very short-term view of the consequences of our decisions.

Financially, the credit craze privileged the consumption today over the bill tomorrow, putting the whole system in a mess which nobody knows if and when it will ever recover. Without a well-developed frontal lobe, the higher mental faculties of long-term planning are substituted by short-term childish gratification.

The frontal lobes “determine similarities and differences between things or events.” It seems that the frontal lobes integrate the qualities of clear mental discrimination, which allows us to make subtle distinctions and to recognize the truth.

On a spiritual plane, “discriminating awareness” is an important mental quality to develop in the path toward an expanded awareness. Even though the qualities of mental discrimination are going to be overcome in the advanced stages of the path, those stages can’t be bypassed. While the absence of mental discrimination in an enlightened being means joining a larger awareness which doesn’t depend on the conceptual mind any more, in a person who didn’t train his mind and soul it means a schizophrenic state.

Without well-developed frontal lobes in the population, political leaders can easily manipulate truth, gain approvals with highly emotive messages and contradict themselves often – with no consequences. If people can’t see the big picture any more, focusing only on the last novelty with a weak memory, there’s not even any need any more by states to threaten the freedom of the press. Simply, people won’t be bothered by consistency and truth any more. Then promises and declarations by politicians can be disproved without even being noticed.

Damage to the frontal lobes include distractibility, poor attention and poor memory. Those damages also cause inability to plan ahead and indifference to people and the world around, alternated with euphoric and uninhibited behaviors. Those symptoms are related to physical damage to the frontal lobes and it would be going too far to apply them to the use of technology: however there’s a strong resemblance of those symptoms with Internet addiction or with attention deficit disorder.

Many pediatrics associations suggest to parents to avoid video technology in the first 2 years of age, while the Waldorf education method refrains from exposing a child to technology till much later to respect the cognitive and emotional development of children. Without need of brain scans and neurotechnological tools, the mystical sensitivity is able to connect with the inner nature of the mind.

If frontal lobe development is being stunted in young people by the massive use of technology there’s little surprise that those symptoms are rising in young people as well as in older people who have already had their frontal lobes developed, on different levels of intensity. On a widespread level, with the fast pace of technology, more and more people experience difficulties in concentrating on a long task, as for instance in reading books.

So will the world resemble Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, where society was structured in such a way that every desire was satisfied in a short time? In case of unpleasurable feelings, there was soma, the perfect drug with no side effects.

I feel the conflict between short- and long-term goals will be at the center stage in the next few years, as well as the one between the mind frames for specialization versus seeing the whole picture. System theory and the science of complexity are important developments toward a vision of reality which takes complex interactions into consideration, but basically they are founded on the same thought modalities of specialization and reductionism.

For instance, now we have much more knowledge of the complex environmental interactions but we are still far from seeing the whole picture. Like the search for the elementary particles, there will probably be no end in that knowledge. Though the more we progress in environmental knowledge, if we just rely on information, the more we risk making bigger disasters looking for “solutions,” as in the geo-engineering proposals to “hack and fix the planet” in order to reverse global warming.

We can probably find good advice in ancient Taoist, American Indian, or just philosophies of organic farmers on how to interact as human beings with nature and, it would be much better if we join those philosophies with scientific data.

What is needed in the complex world is to conjoin the science of complexity with a sensitive intellect connected both to the inner world of the soul and the outer world. An intellect which can pierce reality and thoughts, with an intuitive and large vision, a kind of wisdom which allows wise people to know the depth of reality through direct contact.

Personal orgasm

Ivo Quartiroli — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:14:40 +0000

[en]

Many human activities began as social ones and were shared and with time got transformed into individual and personal ones. This happened especially with the media and technologies. Two examples: transportation, where cars (which are mostly used as a means of personal transportation) imposed themselves on other forms of travel; and the media, where TV, for instance, started being viewed collectively, went on to a TV set for every family, then to one for every single member of the family.

At the root of this there are obvious commercial reasons: the more a product becomes invidividual the more the sales. But this is not the only reason. Commercial needs are coemergent with psychic transformation – the one affects the other. The tendency toward individuality also develops in areas which were “traditionally planned” to be shared.

One of those is sexuality. Masturbation is an evergreen activity, but it hasn’t always been accepted historically. It has been condemned for a long time, mostly through religious rulings, even scaring boys that it would make them blind. Even though masturbation is still not socially accepted in many parts of the world, especially for women, during the so-called sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s women established a more direct and aware relationship with their bodies, which included the right to masturbate withour guilt feelings.

But then, as anything which starts as counterculture and a spontaneous social movement, once it becomes somewhat accepted in the mainstream, it then becomes part of the economy, which makes products out of it.

Masturbation is expanding. Among the reasons is the AIDS emergency which produces suspicion compared to the “golden years” of free love; another one is the fast growth of singles and in general of short-term relationships.

Thus a big market is being opened, a market made of objects, porn, sex toys of the more variegate kinds, even remote-controlled and technologically complex sex machines, the Rolls Royce of sex toys. This phenomenon can be creative, fun, and liberating, but at the same time marks an anthropological transformation.

At first glance it seems that sex is becoming technological, but actually it is technology which in the process of digitalization of reality is assimilating human activities more and more. Social life is moving in a digital realm through social networks, the search of a partner and sexual meetings through the dating sites sites, and human biology is seen as a long list of DNA codes.

Becoming part of the big hotchpotch of technology, sex in turn is becoming “personal” and “at click range,” where pleasure, according to what technology offers, has to be immediate, personalized, with various options and, of course, efficient: a guaranteed and quick orgasm. A long wait for orgasm would be as annoying as waiting for a website with a slow Internet connection.

[/en][it]

Molte attività umane sono iniziate come sociali e condivise e nel tempo si sono trasformate in individuali e personali. Questo è avvenuto in particolare per i media e le tecnologie. Due esempi per tutti: il trasporto, dove l’automobile si è imposta sulle altre forme di trasporto ed è perlopiù utlizzata come forma di trasporto personale, e i media, dove ad esempio la televisione, iniziata in forma di visione collettiva, è passata ad una televisione per ogni famiglia e poi ad una per ogni componente del nucleo familiare.

Alla base di questo vi sono ovviamente ragioni commerciali per le quali più un prodotto diviene individuale maggiori sono le vendite, ma non è la sola ragione. Le necessità commerciali sono coemergenti con la trasformazione della psiche, l’una influenza l’altra. La tendenza verso l’individualità si sviluppa anche su aree che erano “tradizionalmente progettati” per la condivisione.

Una di queste è la sessualità. La masturbazione è un’attività sempreverde ma non è sempre stata accettata nella storia. Perlopiù tramite dettami religiosi, è stata condannata per lungo tempo, fino al punto di terrorizzare i ragazzi dicendo loro che sarebbero diventati ciechi. Anche se in molte parti del mondo la masturbazione non è tutt’ora accettata socialmente, in particolare per le donne, durante la cosiddetta rivoluzione sessuale degli anni ’60 e ’70 le donne hanno instaurato una relazione più diretta e consapevole con i loro corpi, includendo in questa il diritto a masturbarsi senza sensi di colpa.

Ma poi, come qualsiasi cosa che inizia come controcultura a partire da un movimento sociale spontaneo, nel momento in cui diventa un minimo accettata, entra come parte dell’economia e vengono creati dei prodotti al riguardo.

Ecco che si apre allora tutto un mercato fatto di oggetti, pornografia, sex toys delle specie più variegate, anche con il controllo remoto via Internet da parte del partner, e sex machines ingegneristicamente complesse, le Rolls Royce dei sex toys. Il fenomeno può risultare creativo, divertente e liberatorio, ma allo stesso tempo segna una trasformazione antropologica.

A prima vista sembra che il sesso stia diventando tecnologico, ma in realtà è la tecnologia che nel suo processo di digitalizzazione della realtà sta assorbendo sempre più attività umane. La vita sociale si sposta in un ambito digitale con i social networks, la ricerca del partner e degli incontri sessuali sui siti appositi, e la biologia umana viene vista come una lunga lista di codici DNA.

Diventando parte del gran calderone della tecnologia, il sesso a sua volta si sta rendendo “personal” e “a portata di clic”, dove il piacere, secondo le offerte della tecnologia, dev’essere immediato, personalizzato, con opzioni variegate e naturalmente, efficiente: l’orgasmo deve essere garantito e veloce. Una lunga attesa per l’orgasmo diventerebbe fastidiosa quanto l’attesa di un sito web con una lenta connessione ad Internet.

[/it]

[en]

Titled “Now You Can Have a Partner that will Always Hit Your Spot, Anytime You Want, for as Long as You Want” this site is just one of the thousands which sell sex toys or more sophisticated sex machines. The way they introduce their creations is symbolic of the inner mechanisms which are triggered by the tool (the parts between parentheses are my comments).

Obviously, you deserve all the pleasure you can get. But human partners can sometimes let you down. If you find yourself wishing your lover or lovers were more dependable or more available, may we suggest one that will get you off anytime, every time.

(Technology is great in giving control, so why deal with the ups and downs of your lover or lovers? You can decide when, how and how long you want to get pleasure. And if you feel unworthy since none of the lovers satisfy you, or if you think they are all wimps with no passion, now you can get the perfect partner!)

Monkey Rocker™ is one of the best innovations in self-pleasuring since the vibrator. It’s a rocking seat with a special pivoting thrust arm assembly which holds and thrusts a wide variety of sex toys.

(We are updated, this is vibrator 2.0 with even more options and features.)

Though it can’t hug you back, or cuddle, it’s perfectly understandable for you to develop feelings for your Monkey Rocker.™ After all, from the moment you remove it from the unmarked box it arrives in, your Monkey Rocker™ is ready and eager to please you. Just attach the handle assembly and your favorite dildo, and it’s ready to play.

(You could develop feelings for it…and don’t feel guilty…“it’s perfectly understandable.”)

In fact, with no motors to plug in or breakdown, your Monkey Rocker™ is always ready to play. You and your fantasies are in complete control. Monkey Rocker™ relies entirely on your movement to do all of its thrusting. You set the pace. Quick short strokes, long and deep, or anything in between. It’s all about you. No guilt, no risk, no one’s getting hurt.

(Perfect control through the machine, no need to be receptive and open to anybody, you are finally empowered! And you can surrender to the machine with no shame or guilt.)

This is going to be one relationship with NO learning curve. With its wide, stable base, and smooth gliding movement, you’re going to feel right at home from the first time you climb on. Settle in, grab the handle if you want, then grab yourself or your magic wand or a nearby human partner, anything you have in mind, Monkey Rocker™ is ready to deliver.

(…grab yourself or your magic wand or a nearby human partner, anything you have “in mind”…Looks like the world, human beings included, are creations of our mind, at our control as in a video game.)

YOU can scream if you like, but Monkey Rocker™ won’t make a sound. If you can keep YOUR sound level down, total privacy is yours.

(Those annoying moans and screams of my partner… and what will the neighburs think? Maybe they’ll suspect that I have sex with a…oh my God…with a human being? And now I can scream as much as I want without feeling a slut.)

And when you’re done, you’re done. That’s it. Your Monkey Rocker™ doesn’t have any expectations. Your Monkey Rocker™ will never berate you for taking too long, coming too soon, leaving suddenly, staying out all night, talking too much, drinking too much or seeing other machines. And no matter how big or small it is, your Monkey Rocker™ loves your ass. Back it on up. Bring it on. You never have to wonder what it REALLY thinks of you; your Monkey Rocker™ LOVES you! And is always ready to prove it.

(No need to feel unworthy or vulnerable. This machine will accept you unconditionally, even your fat ass. This is the mark of real love.)

The producers say that the tool can be used with a partner as well, for instance:

If your partner’s sexual appetite exceeds yours, don’t let her frustration slowly poison your relationship with resentment. There’s a good chance your partner would be delighted to have something like Monkey Rocker™ to help keep her satisfied. Compared to cheating or divorce, the cost is far less and the potential for happiness is much greater.

(Looks like a great investment!)

Or:

Another possible advantage is reducing your performance anxiety. If you’re not certain you’ll be able to satisfy her, Monkey Rocker™ can. And she’ll think better of you that you care enough about her satisfaction to have a backup ready.

(You can now out source your sexual acts to the machine, which will take care of her satisfaction, as a “backup”.)

The sex machine shuts up in a single hit every superego voices. The superego is the inner judge and the inner controller which limits our free and authentic expression. Furthermore, the sex machine it avoids the difficulties of facing our vulnerabilities, avoids the fear of not feeling accepted, and the difficulties in showing our desire candidly to our partner.

Sexuality involves complex psychological processes regarding guilt, shame, and our sense of limits. Even the intensity of a passionate gaze or surrendering to pleasure can be difficult to include fully in our sexuality with a partner. But those are exactly the difficulties which have to be crossed to integrate our humanity, intensity, and ability to relate in depth through sex.

Even though sex machines can work for couples too, basically they are made for masturbation which, added to cybersex through chats and webcams, makes solo sex a growing activity, even though mediated by sex toys, sex machines or by a chat window and a webcam.

People can have different opinions about masturbation but in this activity there’s an opportunity as well for the brave souls who dare to go into their depths.

Self-love can become a tantric practice. Practicing with sexual energy without a partner, through breathing techniques, meditation and solo sex techniques has been a spiritual path in certain tantric traditions to reach the source of sexual energy, which, refined and transformed, is the same source of love, awareness, and spiritual energy. Through tantra we can understand that we ourselves are the source of sexual energy and that the other is just triggering what is already in us. Then, at the deepest tantric levels, there isn’t anymore me, you, or the attraction between us: all connect in a global Oneness (or in a cosmic orgy if we prefer it this way).

So in a way, whether the partner is a human being or a sex toy or if the sex act is mediated by cybersex doesn’t change much for our path to discovery. With human beings we are more emotionally engaged and this brings us to project on them our object relationships (parent figures mostly), our expectations, our ego, our sense of worth or worthlessness. The less emotionally engaging the sexual relationship is, the less projections we’ll have toward the other and the more the attention we can give to our inner movements, to our reactions and the flow of sexual energy. After all the Monkey Rocker presentation hit a deeper truth (though I doubt the authors of the text are into tantric philosophy).

The question is: does relating sexually with objects or through the Internet bring a larger awareness of our sexuality and of the self in general, or is an object relationship being created even with objects and media? At first glance, I’d say the second hypothesis, since the Net’s modalities of fruition leave little space to a 180-degree turn of attention from the screen to inner life.

The sensation is that the technological way toward sexuality and the expansion of sex toys share the same attributes which give technological gadgets their fascination: control (cybersex can be stopped at any moment with a simple click; sex toys for every taste, options to manipulate sensations); predictability (differently from a person with his complexities); independence (technology feeds the feeling or the illusion or freedom, technological sex doesn’t need to become attached to anybody or have any continuity); speed (going straight to pleasure and orgasm avoiding delays). Also, it quickly brings back energy to the body and its sensations somehow balance the stressful use of the mind in the information society.

Technological sex is part of the more general drive to find an answer to human needs translating them into digital and wanting to upgrade ourselves, feelings and sensations included, through technology. Those “superpowers” seem a reflection on the mental plane of the self-awareness and the metamorphosis capacities we can acquire through a path of self-knowledge. But the pursuit for qualities is directed toward the external, being through technological gadgets or DNA manipulation.

The sex machine site writes: “Though it can’t hug you back, or cuddle, it’s perfectly understandable for you to develop feelings for your Monkey Rocker.” Relating with objects we can substitute an object relationship that is part of human sharing, in this case sex and the feelings associated with it, with a machine or an object. In Japan, where the first uses of robots to take care of and give company to elders are beginning, it has been noticed that the users were developing feelings for them.

What happens when such a technological approach toward deep human needs, which involve care, affection and sexuality are mediated by machines? What happens when this approach toward sexuality is the first and maybe the only one by a cybervirgin?

What happens when all social indicators are saying that people have less and less real intimate and trustful connections in real life, when East and West societes are sharing the same alienation and when sex machines and robots are coming into our lifes?

[/en][it]

Con il titolo “Ora puoi avere un partner che raggiungerà sempre il tuo punto, quando vuoi e per tutto il tempo che vuoi”, questo sito è solo uno delle migliaia che vendono sex toy o più elaborate sex machines. Il modo in cui introducono le loro creazioni è simbolico dei meccanismi interiori che vengono attivati fallo strumento. Le parti tra parentesi sono i miei commenti.

Ovviamente, ti meriti tutto il piacere che puoi ottenere. Ma i partner umani qualche volta possono deluderti. Se ti trovi a desiderare che il tuo amante o i tuoi amanti fossero più affidabili o più disponibili, possiamo suggerirtene uno che ti farà decollare ogni volta, tutte le volte.

(La tecnologia è grande per fornire controllo, quindi perché mai avere a che fare con gli alti e i bassi dei tuoi amanti? Puoi decidere quando, come e quanto a lungo vuoi godere. E se non ti senti abbastanza attraente per il fatto che nessun amante ti può soddisfare, oppure se pensi che siano tutti degli imbranati senza passione, ora puoi avere il partner perfetto!)

Monkey Rocker™ è una delle migliori innovazioni per la masturbazione dall’invenzione del vibratore. E’ un sedile oscillante com un perno speciale di spinta che sostiene e spinge un’ampia varietà di giocattoli sessuali.

(Siamo aggiornati, questo è il vibratore 2.0 che ha ancora più opzioni e possibilità)

Anche se non può ricambiare un abbraccio o coccolarti, è perfettamente comprensibile se provi dei sentimenti per il tuo Monkey Rocker.™ Dopotutto, dal momento in cui lo togli dalla scatola senza dicitura in cui arriva, il tuo Monkey Rocker™ è pronto e desideroso di soddisfarTI.

(Potresti provare dei sentimenti… e non sentirti in colpa… “è perfettamente comprensibile”)

Infatti, senza motori da collegare o che si possano guastare, il tuo Monkey Rocker™ è sempre pronto per te. Tu e le tue fantasie sono in completo controllo. Monkey Rocker™ si basa interamente sui tuoi movimenti perché effetti le sue spinte. Tu definisci il ritmo. Colpi veloci e corti, lunghi e profondi, o qualsiasi via di mezzo. Dipende interamente da te. Nessun senso di colpa, nessun rischio, nessuno che si faccia male.

(Controllo perfetto tramite la macchina, nessun bisogno di essere recettivi o aperti verso nessuno, finalmente hai il tuo potere! E puoi abbandonarti alla macchina senza sensi di colpa né vergogna)

Questa è una relazione senza una curva di apprendimento. Con i suoi movimento ampi, stabili e fluidi, ti sentirai a casa dal primo momento in cui ci salirai sopra. Mettiti in comodità, se vuoi afferra la maniglia, quindi afferrati, o afferra la tua bacchetta magica oppure un partner umano nei pressi, qualsiasi cosa che ti passa per la mente, Monkey Rocker™ è pronto per la consegna.

(afferrati, o afferra la tua bacchetta magica oppure un partner umano nei pressi, qualsiasi cosa che ti passa “per la mente”… Sembra come se il mondo, esseri umani compresi, siano creazioni della nostra mente, sotto il nostro controllo come in un video game).

TU puoi urlare se ti va, ma Monkey Rocker™ non emetterà un suono. Se tu puoi tenere il TUO livello di suono basso, avrai una privacy totale.

(Questi fastidiosi gemiti e urla del partner… e cosa penseranno i vicini? Magari penseranno che sto facendo sesso con… oh mio Dio… con un essere umano? Anche, ora posso urlare quanto voglio senza sentirmi una troia)

E quando hai finito, hai finito. Questo è tutto. Il tuo Monkey Rocker™ non ha alcuna aspettativa. Il tuo Monkey Rocker™ non ti rimprovererà mai per metterci troppo tempo, venire troppo alla svelta, andartene d’improvviso, stare fuori tutta la notte, parlare troppo, bere troppo, o frequentare altre macchine. E, a prescindere che sia grande o piccolo, il tuo Monkey Rocker™ ama il tuo sedere. Dacci dentro. Mettilo in azione. Not avrai mai bisogno di chiderti cosa VERAMENTE pensi di te; il tuo Monkey Rocker™ TI AMA! Ed è sempre pronto per dimostrartelo.

(Nessun bisogno di provare senso di inadeguatezza o vulnerabilità. Questa macchina ti accetterà incondizionatamente, compreso il tuo grande sedere. Questo è il segno del vero amore.)

I produttori affermano che lo strumento può essere usato anche con un partner, ad esempio:

Se l’appetito sessuale del tuo partner supera il tuo, non fare in modo che la sua frustrazione avveleni la relazione con i risentimenti. C’è una buona possibilità che il tuo partner si possa rallegrare dall’avere qualcosa come Monkey Rocker™ per aiutarla nella sua soddisfazione. In confronto all’inganno o al divorzio, il costo è molto minore e la potenzialità di felicità è molto maggiore.

(Sembra un grande investimento!)

oppure

Un altro possibile vantaggio è quello di ridurre le tue ansie da performance. Se non sei certo di poterla soddisfare, Monkey Rocker™ può. E lei avrà una migliore opinione di te perché tu ti prendi cura della sua soddisfazione avendo un backup a disposizione.

(Ora puoi esternalizzare i tuoi atti sessuali verso la macchina che si prenderà cura della sua soddisfazione, come un “backup”)

La macchina da sesso zittisce in un colpo solo tutte le voci del superego. Il superego è il giudice e controllore interiore che limita la nostra libertà e la nostra espressione autentica. Inoltre la macchina da sesso evita il dover vedersi la propria vulnerabilità, evita il timore di essere accettato ed evita la difficoltà nel manifestare il proprio desiderio in modo chiaro di fronte al partner.

La sessualità coinvolge processi psichici complessi che riguardano i sensi di colpa, la vergogna e il nostro senso dei limiti. Anche la stessa l’intensità di uno sguardo appassionato o l’abbandonarsi pienamente al piacere possono essere atti difficili da includere nella propria sessualità. Ma sono esattamente queste le difficoltà da attraversare per integrare la nostra umanità, intensità e capacità di relazionarci profondamente tramite il sesso.

Anche se le macchine per il sesso possono essere utilizzate dalle coppie, fondamentalmente sono strumenti per la masturbazione i quali, aggiunti ai cibersesso tramite le chat e le webcam, fa sì che il sesso da soli sia un’attività in crescita, anche se è mediato da oggetti tipo sex toys o da una finestra di chat sul computer o una webcam.

La gente ha diverse opinioni a riguardo della masturbazione, ma in questa atttività c’è anche per chi ha coraggio, l’opportunità di entrare nella propria profondità.

Il sesso con se stessi può diventare una pratica tantrica. Lavorare con l’energia sessuale senza un partner, attraverso tecniche di respiro, meditazione e sesso in solitaria in alcune tradizioni tantriche ha rappresentato un percorso per raggiungere la sorgente dell’energia sessuale, la quale, quando viene raffinata e trasformata, è la stessa sorgente dell’amore, della consapevolezza e dell’energia spirituale. Tramite il tantra possiamo comprendere che siamo la sorgente stessa dell’energia sessuale e che l’altro dà solamente l’avvio a ciò che è già presente in noi stessi. Poi, a livelli più profondi tantrici, non esiste più alcun me, te e neppure l’attrazione tra di noi, tutto si connette in un’unità globale (o in un’orgia cosmica se la si vuole vedere in questo modo).

In un certo senso, che il partner sia un essere umano o un sex toy, o se l’atto sessuale viene mediato dal cibersesso, non cambia per il nostro percorso di scoperta. Con gli esseri umani siamo più coinvolti emozionalmente e questo ci porta a proiettare in loro i nostri oggetti di relazione (primariamente le figure genitoriali), le nostre aspettative, il nostro ego, il nostro senso di aver o non avere valore. Se la relazione sessuale è emozionalmente meno coinvolgente, ci saranno meno proiezioni verso l’altro e potremo dare più attenzione ai movimenti interiori, alle nostre reazioni e al flusso dell’energia sessuale. Dopotutto la presentazione del Monkey Rocker ha toccato una verità più profonda, anche se dubito che gli autori del testo siano interessati alla filosofia tantrica.

La domanda quindi è: il rapportarsi sessualmente con oggetti e tramite Internet porta ad una maggiore consapevolezza della propria energia sessuale e di sé in generale, oppure si crea un oggetto di relazione anche con gli oggetti e i mezzi? In prima battuta sarei più per la seconda ipotesi, in quanto le modalità di fruizione della Rete lasciano poco spazio ad un giro di 180 gradi dell’attenzione, dallo schermo all’interiorità.

L’impressione è che la via tecnologica verso la sessualità e l’espansione dell’uso di sex toys abbia gli stessi attributi che danno ai gadget tecnologici il loro fascino: controllo (cybersesso che può essere terminato con un semplice clic, sex toys per tutti i gusti, opzioni per manipolare le sensazioni), prevedibilità (a differenza di una persona con le sue complessità), indipendenza (la tecnologia alimenta il senso o l’illusione di libertà, il sesso tecnologico non richiede attaccamenti o una continuità), velocità (andare al sodo del piacere senza perdite di tempo). Anche, riporta l’energia al corpo e alle sue sensazioni in modo rapido per equilibrare in qualche modo l’uso stressante della mente nella società dell’informazione.

Il sesso tecnologico fa parte della più generale spinta a trovare una risposta alle necessità umane traducendole in digitale e volendo fare un “upgrade” di noi stessi, comprese emozioni e sensazioni, tramite le tecnologia. Questi “superpoteri” sembrano un riflesso sul piano della mente della consapevolezza di noi stessi e delle capacità di metamorfosi che vengono date da un percorso di conoscenza interiore. Ma la ricerca delle qualità viene rivolta verso l’esterno, che sia tramite gadget tecnologici o la manipolazione del DNA.

Il sito della sex machine scrive che “Anche se non può ricambiare un abbraccio o coccolarti, è perfettamente comprensibile se provi dei sentimenti per il tuo Monkey Rocker.” Relazionandoci con gli oggetti possiamo sostituire un oggetto di relazione di qualcosa che fa parte dello scambio umano, in questo caso il sesso con le sue emozioni, con una macchina o un oggetto. In Giappone, dove si iniziano i primi utilizzi del robot per prendersi cura e tenere compagnia agli anziani, è stato notato che gli utilizzatori sviluppano sentimenti per essi.

Cosa succede quanto un tale approccio tecnologico verso i bisogni profondi umani, che coinvolgono cura, affetto e sessualità sono meduati ma macchine? Cosa avviene quando questo approccio verso la sessualità è il primo e magari l’unico da parte di una cibervergine?

Cosa succede quando quando tutti gli indicatori sociali stanno dicendo che le persone hanno sempre meno connessioni intime e di fiducia nella vita reale, quando l’Oriente e l’Occidente sono accomunati dalla stessa alienazione e quando le macchine da sesso e i robots entrano nella nostra vita?

[/it]

Cars, Bytes, and Territory

Ivo Quartiroli — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 02:06:59 +0000

[en]

Nicholas Carr writes about technological time and space on Realtime kills real space and Real time is realtime. How does technology changes our perception of the territory?

I am buying a house in a village in the Appennines mountains with some land annexed. As it often happens in those mountain areas, the properties are broken up into small portions which reflect the complicated hereditary and family lines, where every single small piece of land has its own identity. The fields’ names vary: sometimes they refer to events which happened there, or to the characteristics of the territory, and there are funny and odd names as well.

Every field has its own personality through its name, its own history, its own micro-“genius loci,” which was known and experienced by the local population. But not anymore. The names and their locations in the territory are vague memories of some elderly people of the village. Google Earth will not be able to track down their names, but even in that case they would be like names on the tombstones, emptied of their souls.

During the last 50 years or so, the population of the village dropped from 200 to currently around 20. As with other places, the factor contributing most to the change in the territory has been road construction leading to the massive use of cars which came with industrialization. Roads have changed the geography of places, moved the places of residence and work, and forced many people to own cars. Individual means of transportation instead of collective ones have been privileged due to a series of economic reasons connected with the car industry.

Besides places, cars have also changed sociality in a massive manner, starting from removing children playing on the roads, to lack of public spaces for meeting, and development of big commercial centers which can be reached only by cars.

The massive transfer to cities and their suburbs during the last decades moved us away from an immediate and felt relationship with the territory, which is now mostly seen as a road from one place to another. At a certain point the ever-spreading use of mobile phones outdistanced us further from the territory, moving our attention to somewhere and someone else while we are staying in a certain place.

Al Gore’s father promoted the American highway system, and his son became one of the greatest promoters of information highways. As highways place everybody in car boxes, the Internet has placed us in front of a screen, mostly indoors at home or in an office. Even when we are on some territory we are connected while mobile through some gadget – again in front of a screen. When we drive along the road we get a digital representation of the territory through GPS systems, adding a further layer between the external space and our presence and attention in it.

[/en][it]

Nicholas Carr scrive sullo spazio e il tempo tecnologico a Realtime kills real space e Real time is realtime. Cosa cambia la tecnologia nella nostra percezione del territorio?

Sto acquistando una casa in un villaggio dell’alto appennino emiliano con dei terreni annessi. Come avviene spesso in quelle aree montane, il terreno di proprietà è diviso in piccole porzioni che riflettono le complicate linee ereditarie e famigliari, dove ogni singolo fazzoletto di terreno ha una sua identità. I nomi dei campi sono dei più vari: talvolta si riferiscono a fatti avvenuti nel luogo, oppure a caratteristiche del territorio, e vi sono anche nomi buffi e stravaganti.

Ogni campo tramite il suo nome ha la sua personalità, la sua storia, il suo micro “genius loci”, che era conosciuto e vissuto dalla popolazione locale. Ora non più. I nomi e la loro locazione nel territorio sono un vago ricordo di pochi vecchi del paese. Google Earth non ne potrà rintracciare i nomi e anche in qual caso sarebbero come nomi sulle lapidi, svuotate dalla loro anima.

Il paese è passato nei decenni da una popolazione di circa 200 persone a una ventina. Come per molti altri luoghi, il fattore che ha più contribuito a cambiare la vita del territorio è stato la costruzione delle strade e l’uso massiccio delle automobili che è andato di pari passo con l’industrializzazione. Le strade hanno cambiato la geografia dei luoghi, hanno spostato i luoghi di residenza e di lavoro e hanno costretto molti ad avere un’automobile. E’ stato privilegiato il trasporto individuale piuttosto che lo sviluppo del trasposto collettivo per una serie di interessi legati al mondo dell’automobile e di tutti i suoi annessi.

Oltre che i luoghi, le automobili hanno cambiato la socialità in modo massiccio, dal togliere i giochi dei bambini in strada, alla mancanza di spazi pubblici di incontro, allo sviluppo di grandi centri commerciali che possono essere visitati solo con un’automobile.

Il massiccio spostamento verso le città e le periferie dei decenni scorsi ci hanno allontanati da un rapporto immediato e vissuto con il territorio, che viene visto perlopiù come una strada per andare da un luogo all’altro. Ad un certo punto il massiccio uso dei cellulari ci ha distanziato ulteriormente dal territorio, spostando la nostra attenzione in un luogo “altro” verso qualcun altro mentre ci troviamo in un certo luogo.

Il padre di Al Gore promosse il sistema autostradale americano e il figlio è stato uno dei più grandi promotori delle autostrade dell’informazione. Così come le autostrada hanno posto tutti quanti nelle scatole delle automobili, Internet ci ha posto tutti quanti di fronte ad uno schermo, perlopiù all’interno di qualche casa o ufficio. Anche quando siamo all’esterno nel territorio siamo connessi in mobilità tramite qualche gadget, di nuovo di fronte ad uno schermo. Quando percorriamo una strada in automobile otteniamo una rappresentazione digitale del territorio attraverso i sistemi GPS, ponendo un ulteriore strato tra lo spazio esterno e la nostra presenza e attenzione ad esso.

[/it]

[en]

The Internet and mobile technologies are acting on the territory on another level: more than digitalizing it and distancing us from it, they are bringing us in front of a screen, making territory useless. We can operate on our bank account from the screen, we can do our shopping, communicate with our friends, search for our soulmate or for a sexual meeting, and work on the Net for many traditional jobs which have been brought to the Internet and for numerous new professions born from the Net itself.

Just as highways have forced many people to buy a car, information highways are forcing almost everyone to buy a computer and have an Internet connection, for one reason or another. Technologies – and especially the computer – far from being only practical tools, are getting into the depths of the psyche, determining the manner in which we connect with ourselves and with others.

The lack of a real contact with territory also means that environmental problems are developing without our giving them special attention, or we observe the consequences in the way mediated by news, video clips, images and by Google Earth representations which map every layer of the world’s geography, perhaps as an unconscious attempt to get back a contact with the territory, even if only on a mental level.

In a territory which has lost its soul, its history and even our attention, GPS systems tell us continously where “we are.” Being alien from the territory creates a lack of direction which we try to compensate for with a digital measurement of our “presence.” But the lack of direction takes place on an inner level, in a territory made of concrete and commercial centers without any more narrative connected to our life history. Also, we distance ourselves from a territory presented as dangerous and full of criminality, in its turn presented by the media as alien and foreign.

The processes of digitalization and cancelling of reality have started in the mind before the strong intervention of matter, representing and mediating it layer after layer. The roots of such distance from matter are to be traced back to the Judeo-Christian tradition, which has been continued in the Western tradition by Descartes who made the separation between the soul, the body and the matter full-blown.

Matter was first modelled physically, an act which was speeded up beginning with industrialization, then rebuilt digitally and simulated through technologies of abstractions.

As an individual who neglects the body and the signals it sends off will develop some pathologies, the earth in its turn, being deprived of our attention, of our earthly rootedness and our respect, creates diseases and calls for our attention (provided that between one click and another we still have some attention to spare).

In our culture which sees matter and spirit as two different and distant things, there’s the misunderstanding that giving attention to the soul brings a distancing from the tangible. A path toward the truth is, in my opinion, a process of contact with the real, i.e. with “what is,” including matter and the physical bodies which are a part of it. The return to the contact with territory and taking care of the planet can happen through a spiritual approach, seen as a contact with the real, integrated in a wider awareness, beginning from the awareness of ourselves and of what we really are and need.

Instead, the solutions presented to the environmental problem are almost always seen as technological. Insofar as those are needed and an integral part of the care of the planet, those are seen as a Messiah which will save us, in a childish projection of magical onnipotence.

Mystifying science, and scientific mysticism

Ivo Quartiroli — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:04:19 +0000

[en]

Edgar Cayce used to say that it is possible to connect with any source of knowledge when our consciousness is expanded to the extent that it can render the Akashic records transparent. In the Eastern mystic tradition as well the access to universal knowledge is a stage which can manifest in the awareness of a person during the evolution of his spiritual path.

In the West, the subject who knows has been separated from the object of knowledge, especially since the introduction of Descartes’ method where the scientist had to separate his subjectivity from the object of research. Modern science, being based on the reproducibility and objectivity principles which are fundamental to Newton’s world of physics, led to an enormous technical and scientific development but doesn’t have the tools to understand awareness, the soul, the psyche itself, or existence. The problem of consciousness which is nagging the neurosciences seems to be elusive to the research method which negates any role for the inner life.

Subjectivity in science has such a marginal role that it became a taboo, so much so that Alan Wallace even wrote The Taboo of Subjectivity (Oxford University Press, 2000). He affirms that through scientific materialism people became convinced that scientists have knowledge about the mind when actually they are ignorant about it, and that non-scientists do not know what they actually know perfectly. Since for science subjective opinions are fallible by definition, it seems that everything that is intuition or perspicacity does not have value if not backed by data and objective procedures.

Comte, the father of positivism, affirming that what could not be observed and measured was to be considered unreal, put the basis for the digitalization of the human being, where intelligence became a number of IQ and human qualities became DNA sequences. Science expanded itself to the point of including areas pertaining to wisdom.

[/en][it]

Edgar Cayce diceva che è possibile connettersi con qualsiasi fonte di conoscenza quando la nostra consapevolezza si fosse espansa in modo tale da rendere trasparente gli archivi Akasici. Anche nella tradizione mistica orientale l’accesso alla conoscenza universale viene considerata una fase che può manifestarsi nella coscienza di una persona durante il suo percorso di evoluzione spirituale.

In Occidente si è separato il soggetto che conosce dall’oggetto di conoscenza, in particolare dal metodo Cartesiano dove lo scienziato separa la sua soggettività dall’oggetto di ricerca. La scienza moderna, basandosi sui principi della riproducibilità e dell’oggettività, funzionali per il mondo della fisica di Newton, ha portato a uno sviluppo tecnico e scientifico enorme ma non ha gli strumenti per comprendere la consapevolezza, l’anima, la psiche stessa, l’esistenza. Il problema della coscienza, che assilla le neuroscienze, sembra essere elusivo al metodo di ricerca che nega all’interiorità alcun ruolo.

La soggettività nella scienza ha un ruolo talmente marginale che è diventato un tabù, tanto che Alan Wallace ha scritto The Taboo of Subjectivity (Oxford University Press. 2000). Egli afferma che tramite il materialismo scientifico le persone si sono convinte che gli scienziati abbiano delle conoscenza sulla mente su cui di fatto sono ignoranti e che i non-scienziati non conoscono ciò che in realtà sanno perfettamente. Poiché i giudizi soggettivi sono per la scienza per definizione fallibili, sembra che tutto ciò che è intuizione o perspicacia non abbia valore se non è suffragato da dati e procedure oggettive.

Comte, il padre del positivismo, affermando che ciò che non poteva essere osservato e misurato andava considerato irreale, poneva le basi per la digitalizzazione dell’essere umano, dove l’intelligenza è diventata un numero di QI e le qualità umane sono diventate sequenze di DNA. La scienza si è espansa fino a includere aree che erano pertinenti alla saggezza.

[/it]

[en]

It is prestigious to be a scientist, therefore, even psychologists and scholars studying social behavior want their place under the sun and place their subjects in the scientific sector, to prevent being confused with charlatans!

Neil Postman in Technopoly says that George Bernard Shaw affirmed that the average person of today is as credulous as a middle-aged person believing blindly in science’s authority, as before he was believing in that of the Church.

Probably, the situation is even worse. I think that during the Middle Ages a peasant secretly did not care much about the Church, living in a world more connected to reality. Today, it is possible to affirm any nonsense, it is enough to start a speech with, “research has discovered that…” and, as Neil Postman affirms:

“The computer shows…” or “The computer has determined…” it is Technopoly’s equivalent of the sentence “It is God’s will” and the effect is roughly the same (Neil Postman, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology, New York: Vintage Books, 1993, p. 115).

The West has excluded the inner channels of exploration from science, leaving them to philosophy or religion but keeping themn at a distance from the definition of truth.

Alan Wallace affirms that a difference between scientific and contemplative discoveries is that while the former are objective and public, the latter are subjective and private. Even between scientists themselves, there is no guarantee that the researches which led to certain discoveries have been developed in an accurate and reliable manner and, there is a tendency to trust the work of colleagues. A complete guarantee could be possible only by repeating the experiments in similar laboratories. Wallace asserts that if scientists were skeptical about their colleagues’ work, science would have developed slowly. He affirms that the same discourse could be applied to contemplative research. If societies valued the contemplative experience, people would simply trust the authenticity of the best souls of their times and of history.

When I read books by the spiritual teachers of the past and the present, I understand that they describe a common state of elevated consciousness, just using different metaphors and words. This motivates me to explore this state myself.

However, the spiritual path, in spite of the availability of precious teachings, should be experienced personally and from the beginning in any case, and there will be no inner progress if we limit ourselves by intellectual knowledge.

The spiritual paths, though often considered something vague or even something that needs psychiatric care (there are also such cases), actually are more “scientific” because they require going back to the source, while science is based on faith on the validity of experiments.

Besides, the spiritual path is never linear, in spite of wise men having lit a torch on the path. The path is at the same time universal and very individual and arduous. The difficulty of the path requires a teacher who has already gone through it in his turn, but in the West the presence of a teacher is considered suspicious; the researcher also needs to overcome the barriers of social acceptance.

We willingly accept the authority of science in the indications about life, perhaps from people who have no personal experience about what they affirm, but we refute the authority of one who has personally travelled a spiritual path and is driven by compassion.

The basis of the rejection of a spiritual teacher has different origins, among them the monopoly of institutionalized religions as far as the soul is concerned, the Christian message that there was only one son of God authorized to teach, and at the same time a 1960s culture which refutes authoritarianism, along with authoritativeness.

In the West there is no knowledge of a spiritually enlightened being, and the connection with a spiritual teacher is not generally accepted, but in the spiritual paths guidance can only come from the ones who matured inside themselves the human qualities to be transmitted, and the ones who have awareness, besides knowledge. Though it is possible to be spiritually realized without teachers, such cases are rare.

In a historical condition of lack of moral, ideological, and ethical indications, science has expanded itself to those. Thus we arrive, as Neil Postman writes in Technopoly, to the situation when it is not enough to affirm that it is immoral to segregate blacks at school, but it is necessary to prove it with standard tests which would reveal that blacks, while being segregated, get worse results and feel humiliated.

The social, moral, and ethical implications which are produced more and more often by science are not supported by the scientist’s inner life. Those hints produced by scientific truths are not offered as a gift from the depths or from the scientist’s capacity of being compassionate.

It reminds me of the story of the mother who had a son who ate too many sweets. Being worried about his health she consulted a monk so that his wisdom could bear on the son. The monk told her to come back in two weeks. The mother came back and the monk told the son, “It is no good eating too many sweets.” The mother, perplexed, asked the monk what the reason was of waiting for two weeks for such a simple phrase. He replied that in the meantime he had to overcome his own indulgence toward sweets.

There are scientists who combined inner research with exterior: just think of Pythagoras, Leonardo da Vinci, Swedenborg, Tesla, or the ancient science of the Vedas. The states of consciousness of the scientist sometimes turned out to be helpful in discoveries related to the natural sciences as well, but they are needed all the more when we deal with understanding the nature of the psyche, of the soul, of consciousness.

To have an effective theory of consciousness it is necessary to study it from the inside and maybe even from beyond the mind, in a space where it is observed by a wider awareness than the mind. The cognitive sciences and neurosciences, refuting the existence of such a consciousness beyond the mind, try to enter with the mind’s tools into spaces where it is inadequate and skids on itself.

Nowadays, we know the enlightened teachers’ indications regarding consciousness, whose models have been valid since a thousand years, unlike those of science which do not stand up to paradigm changes. Nevertheless, only a few scientists welcome the mystic’s affirmations as hypotheses.

When the authority of science is challenged, it seems necessary to choose between science and reason or religion and faith. Religion’s attack on science, for example, on themes of creation, brought the discussion to a dichotomy in such a way that scientific research and themes connected to ethics or the spirit seem incompatible with each other. But between the mind and irrational faith there is a third way.

The connection between scientific research and inner states is possible and, it could enrich science as well. Almaas, the pseudonym of Hameed Ali, developed a path called the Diamond Approach which uses the method of inquiry, an inner exploration which joins the mind, emotions, and sensations for search of the truth. I have interviewed him for Innernet magazine on the matter.

He does not deny the validity of science as far as the scientist’s objectivity is concerned, “in the sense that our subjectivity tends to cloud our perception and knowledge, because of personal beliefs and biases,” nevertheless, science has had incomplete intuition on the matter:

because even though it is an accurate assessment of the normal, everyday consciousness of the human individual, it is not an accurate view of the potential of human subjectivity. It neglects to notice that this biased subjectivity is the subjectivity of the ego, and that the human soul can be free of the ego.

The evolution of the scientist’s inner life is not an important factor for science, which does not distinguish between the subjectivity of the ego and the subjectivity which is derived from wisdom, free from the filters which obscure pure perception of the reality.

Almaas affirms then that, “the truly subjective and personal, meaning one’s own and independent from influences coming from beyond one’s true being, is a rare and hence precious development.”

To my question whether a new scientific method including both subjective and objective approaches could be possible, he answered that what can be given to us by our soul’s maturity “in terms of inquiry, research, discernment, analysis, synthesis, and so on can be very useful in any field of research, and it will require that the researcher integrates this spiritual faculty in their functioning for it to operate in any field.”

Almaas believes that knowing has a mystical or intuitive ground (the gnosis, the nous, the higher intellect of the Greeks), where knowledge and being are inseparable. Western thought and its path have separated being from the objects of consciousness. The foundations of being became the pertinence of mysticism and are considered mysterious, irrational, non–scientific, and even antiscientific.

Almaas agrees with the fact that objective knowledge is the one free from the distortions of the knower, but the path toward objectivity cannot be reached “sterilizing the situation of inquiry, by removing the subject from the field of inquiry.”

Heisenberg’s principle of indetermination tells us that the observer and the object observed cannot be separated on the fundamental level, nevertheless:

we cannot because the knowing subject is nothing but the collapsing of the field of presence and awareness into a knowing self…Descartes’ philosophy of science is an approximation similar to how Newton’s classical theory of physics is a good working approximation to the laws of physics. Now we know that Newton’s physics collapses at the two extreme ends of the scale of physical measurements, where the general theory of relativity and quantum theory have replaced it as more accurate in the domains of macro and micro distances, respectively.

The inadequacy of Descartes’ method is clear in the comprehension of consciousness, of the soul and the divine, where a first-person experience is needed. Almaas believes that mysticism in its turn contributed to negating the fundamental unity of being and knowledge, when considering spiritual knowledge as:

vague, intuitive, mysterious, non-conceptual, incommunicable and so on [while, in his vision], direct mystical knowing and the knowing of specific forms in precise details, can be wed, because they are originally one and non-dual. This means that we can have a mystical knowledge, which is knowledge by identity, that can be precise, clear, specific and detailed.

This channel of knowledge brings the possibility of “scientific knowledge that is direct knowledge; meaning precise and detailed gnosis of forms of manifestation,” objective and direct.

In the same way, observing the subject who knows, who looks at his own reactions, prejudices and attitudes during the act of exploration, makes the subjective distortions less frequent and comes closer to objectivity, seen as a process of distillation.

We find different degrees of objectivity, where each degree is objective within the subjective framework we work with. In other words, if we use the framework that we are separate individuals in the ordinary world, then objective truth means something different from objective truth in a framework that does not hold such assumptions of separate individuality. Again, objectivity means something different depending on whether we assume existence and nonexistence are two antithetical opposites or inseparable and coemergent.

Refining this, “objectivity is complete when there is no more separate self to hold biases,” and this transcends any dichotomy between the observer and the observed object.

This approach reunites after thousands of years of scientific inquiry based on logic and rationality with direct mystic knowledge, for a new method of science which wants to progress toward the discovery of existence.

[/en][it]

Essere scienziati dà prestigio, quindi anche psicologi e studiosi dei comportamenti sociali vogliono un posto al sole e collocano la loro materia nel settore scientifico, non sia mai che venga confusa con qualche ciarlataneria!

Neil Postman in Technopoly riporta che George Bernard Shaw affermò che la persona media di oggi è altrettanto credulona della persona Medioevale, credendo ciecamente nell’autorità della scienza quanto credeva in quella della chiesa.

Forse la situazione è peggiore. Nel Medioevo credo che il contadino se ne fregasse segretamente della chiesa, vivendo in un mondo più connesso con la realtà. Oggi si può affermare qualsiasi fesseria, basta iniziare il discorso con “una ricerca ha rilevato che” e, come afferma Neil Postman, “Il computer dice che” diventa l’equivalente della frase “è volere divino”.

L’occidente ha escluso dalla scienza i canali di esplorazione interiori, lasciati alla filosofia o alla religione ma lontani dalla definizione di verità.

Alan Wallace afferma che una differenza tra le scoperte scientifiche e quelle contemplative è che mentre le prime sono oggettive e pubbliche, le seconde sono soggettive e private. Anche tra scienziati stessi, non c’è la garanzia che le ricerche che portano a certe scoperte siano state svolte in modo accurato e attendibile, e si tende a fidarsi del lavoro dei colleghi. La garanzia completa si avrebbe solo replicando gli esperimenti con laboratori simili. Wallace asserisce che se gli scienziati fossero talmente scettici del lavoro dei loro colleghi, la scienza avrebbe tempi lentissimi. Inoltre afferma che lo stesso discorso potrebbe applicarsi alla ricerca contemplativa. Se le società valorizzassero l’esperienza contemplativa, le persone si fiderebbero semplicemente dell’autenticità delle migliori anime dei loro tempi e della storia.

Quando leggo i libri del maestri del passato e del presente, comprendo che descrivono uno stato comune di elevata consapevolezza, pur con metafore e parole diverse. Questo mi motiva a esplorare a mia volta tale stato.

Tuttavia il percorso spirituale, nonostante la disponibilità di preziosi insegnamenti, va comunque intrapreso personalmente e dall’inizio e non vi sarà alcun progresso interiore limitandoci alla conoscenza intellettuale.

Le vie spirituali, pur essendo considerate spesso come qualcosa di vago, o addirittura che necessita attenzioni psichiatriche (vi sono anche questi casi), sono in realtà più “scientifiche” poiché richiedono di ripercorrere il percorso dall’inizio, mentre la scienza si basa sulla fede della validità degli esperimenti.

Inoltre, il percorso spirituale non è mai lineare, nonostante i saggi hanno acceso la torcia nel cammino. Il percorso è allo stesso tempo universale e molto individuale, e arduo. La difficoltà del cammino richiede un maestro che lo abbia percorso a sua volta, ma in Occidente la presenza di un maestro è vista in termini sospetti; il ricercatore deve anche superare la barriera dell’accettazione sociale.

Accettiamo di buon grado l’autorità della scienza nelle indicazioni per la vita, magari da parte di chi non ha alcuna esperienza personale su ciò che afferma, ma rifiutiamo l’autorevolezza di chi ha percorso personalmente un cammino ed è animato dalla compassione.

Alla base del rifiuto del maestro spirituale vi sono diverse fonti, tra le quali il monopolio delle religioni istituzionalizzate per quanto riguarda le faccende dell’anima, il messaggio Cristiano che vi è stato un solo figlio di Dio autorizzato ad insegnare, e pure una cultura sessantottina di rifiuto dell’autoritarismo che rifiuta anche l’autorevolezza.

In Occidente non c’è la conoscenza dell’essere spiritualmente illuminato né si accetta il rapporto con un maestro, ma nelle strade interiori la guida non può che venire da chi ha maturato in sé gli aspetti da trasmettere, e che possieda consapevolezza oltre che conoscenza. Pur essendo possibile la realizzazione spirituale senza maestri, questi sono casi rari.

In una condizione storica di mancanza di indicazioni morali, ideologiche, etiche, la scienza si è espansa fino a queste. Si arriva, come scrive Neil Postman in Technopoly che non è più sufficiente affermare che la segregare i neri nelle scuole è immorale, ma è necessario provarlo con dei test standardizzati che rivelino che i neri, con la segregazione, ottengono dei risultati peggiori e si sentono umiliati.

Le implicazioni sociali, morali ed etiche che sempre più spesso la scienza produce, non sono supportate dall’interiorità dello scienziato. Tali implicazioni derivate dalle verità scientifiche non vengono offerte come un dono della profondità o della sua capacità di provare compassione da parte dello scienziato.

Mi ricorda la storiella della madre con un figlio che mangiava troppi dolci. Preoccupata per la sua salute, si reca da un monaco affinché la sua saggezza possa far breccia sul figlio. Alla richiesta della madre di aiutarla, il monaco le disse di tornare dopo due settimane. La madre ritornò e il monaco, di fronte al ragazzino, disse “Non è bene mangiare troppi dolci”. La madre, perplessa, chiese al monaco il motivo dell’attesa per una semplice frase. Egli rispose che nel frattempo aveva superato il suo stesso indugiare verso i dolci.

Vi sono scienziati che hanno combinato la ricerca interiore con quella esteriore, basti pensare a Pitagora, Leonardo da Vinci, Swedenborg, Tesla, o l’antica scienza dei Veda. Gli stati di coscienza dello scienziato si sono talvolta rivelati di aiuto anche nelle scoperte relative alle scienze naturali, ma a maggior ragione questi sono necessari quando si tratta di comprendere la natura della psiche, dell’anima, della consapevolezza.

Per avere una teoria effettiva della coscienza è necessario studiarla da dentro e magari anche da oltre la mente, in uno spazio di cui questa è osservata da una consapevolezza più ampia della mente. Le scienze cognitive e le neuroscienze, negando l’esistenza di tale consapevolezza oltre la mente, cercano di entrare con gli strumenti della mente in spazi dove questa è inadeguata e slitta su se stessa.

Oggigiorno conosciamo le indicazioni dei maestri illuminati sulla coscienza, i cui modelli basilari sono validi da migliaia d’anni a differenze di quelli della scienza che non durano i cambi di paradigma. Tuttavia ben pochi scienziati accolgono le affermazioni dei mistici come ipotesi di lavoro.

Quando si mette in discussione l’autorità della scienza, sembra che si debba scegliere tra la scienza/ragione e la religione/fede. L’attacco della religione alla scienza ad esempio sui temi del creazionismo ha portato il dibattito in una dicotomia per cui l’indagine scientifica e i temi legati all’etica o allo spirito sembrano incompatibili. Ma tra ragione e la fede irrazionale esiste una terza via.

La connessione tra indagine scientifica e stati interiori è possibile, e arricchirebbe anche la scienza. Almaas, nome di penna di Hameed Ali, ha sviluppato un percorso chiamato Diamond Approach che utilizza il metodo dell’inquiry, un’esplorazione interiore che riunisce mente, emozioni e sensazioni per la ricerca del vero. L’ho intervistato per Innernet a riguardo.

Egli non nega la validità della scienza per quanto riguarda l’oggettività dell scienziato “nel senso che la nostra soggettività tende a oscurare le nostre percezioni e la nostra conoscenza, a causa delle inclinazioni e convinzioni personali”, tuttavia la scienza a riguardo ha avuto un’intuizione incompleta “perché se è vero che essa valuta correttamente la consapevolezza ordinaria dell’individuo, è anche vero che non tiene conto del potenziale della soggettività umana. Tale concezione non considera che questa soggettività prevenuta è la soggettività dell’ego, e che l’anima umana può essere libera dall’ego”.

L’evoluzione dell’interiorità dello scienziato non è un fattore importante per la scienza, che non distingue tra la soggettività dell’ego e la soggettività che giunge dalla saggezza, libera dai filtri che oscurano la pura percezione della realtà.

Almaas afferma poi che “ciò che è davvero soggettivo e personale – ovvero, il proprio essere autentico al di là delle influenze provenienti dall’esterno – è uno sviluppo raro e dunque prezioso”.

Alla mia domanda se sia possibile un nuovo metodo scientifico che includa sia l’approccio soggettivo sia quello oggettivo, egli rispose che ciò che la maturazione dell’anima può darci “in termini di ricerca, indagine, discernimento, analisi, sintesi e così via può essere molto utile in qualsiasi campo di ricerca; ma perché questo avvenga, il ricercatore deve integrare questa facoltà spirituale nel suo lavoro”.

Almaas ritiene che la conoscenza abbia un fondamento mistico o intuitivo, la gnosi, il nous, l’intelletto superiore dei greci, dove la conoscenza e l’essere si uniscono. Il pensiero occidentale, nel suo percorso, ha separato l’essere dagli oggetti di conoscenza. I fondamenti dell’essere sono diventati pertinenza del misticismo e considerati misteriosi, irrazionali, non scientifici o anche antiscientifici.

Almaas concorda col fatto che la conoscenza oggettiva è quella libera dalle distorsioni di chi conosce, ma il percorso verso l’oggettività, non “si raggiunge sterilizzando l’esplorazione, rimuovendo il soggetto dal dominio di esplorazione”.

Il principio di indeterminazione di Heisenberg ci dice che osservatore e oggetto osservato non possono essere separati a un livello fondamentale, tuttavia, anche

non possiamo, perché il soggetto conoscente non è altro che la ricaduta del dominio della Presenza e della Consapevolezza in un io conoscente [...] La filosofia della scienza di Cartesio era un’approssimazione efficace allo stesso modo in cui la classica teoria della fisica di Newton lo era per le leggi della fisica. Oggi sappiamo che la fisica newtoniana collassa ai due estremi della scala delle misurazioni fisiche, ovvero alla dimensione macroscopica e a quella microscopica, dove è stata sostituita da due teorie più esatte, rispettamene quella generale della relatività e quella quantica.

L’inadeguatezza del metodo Cartesiano si rileva nella comprensione della consapevolezza, dell’anima e del divino, dove è necessaria l’esperienza in prima persona. Almaas ritiene che il misticismo a sua volta abbia contribuito a negare l’unità fondamentale dell’essere e della conoscenza, considerando la conoscenza spirituale come “vaga, intuitiva, misteriosa, non-concettuale, incomunicabile e così via”, mentre nella sua visione:

la conoscenza mistica diretta e la conoscenza precisa delle forme specifiche possono essere unite, perché in origine erano una cosa sola, non-duale. Questo vuol dire che possiamo avere una conoscenza mistica (cioè la conoscenza da parte dell’identità) precisa, chiara, specifica e dettagliata.

Questo canale di conoscenza porta alla possibilità di “una conoscenza scientifica di tipo diretto; ovvero, una gnosi precisa e dettagliata di forme di manifestazione”, oggettiva e diretta.

Allo stesso modo, l’osservazione del soggetto che conosce, che guarda alle proprie reazioni, pregiudizi e atteggiamenti durante l’atto di esplorazione, fa sì che le distorsioni soggettive si diradino avvicinandosi sempre più all’oggettività, vista come un processo di distillazione:

Esistono diversi gradi di oggettività, ognuno dei quali è oggettivo all’interno della cornice soggettiva con cui lavoriamo. In altre parole, se usiamo la cornice secondo cui nel mondo ordinario siamo individui separati, la verità oggettiva sarà diversa da quella che vedremo all’interno di una cornice sprovvista di tale assunto sull’individualità separata. Di nuovo, oggettività ha un significato diverso se consideriamo l’esistenza e la non-esistenza due opposti antitetici o due realtà inseparabili e coemergenti.

Procedendo con le raffinazioni, “l’oggettività è completa quando non esiste più un io distinto con le sue alterazioni”, il che trascende qualsiasi dicotomia tra osservatore ed oggetto osservato.

Questo approccio riunisce dopo migliaia di anni il tipo di indagine scientifico logica, razionale e scientifica con la conoscenza diretta mistica, per un nuovo metodo della scienza che voglia progredire verso la scoperta dell’esistenza.

[/it]